Posted on 11/02/2006 4:12:49 PM PST by Kudsman
The media confess!
See? What Did They Tell You? By Rick Horowitz
When right-wingers dream...
"Thank you, Burt. Thank you, Christine. And a warm welcome to all of you -- our shareholders and advertisers, without whom we wouldn't be gathered here this morning, our reporters and editors, and, of course, all you valued readers. It's a great crowd, and we're so glad you're here!
"These little get-togethers of ours grow more elaborate every year, don't they? But we understand, when you come right down to it, that it's about lots more than fruit cups and cinnamon rolls. Here at the Daily Treasoner, we take our responsibilities very seriously.
"And what are those responsibilities? In a phrase, to do everything we can to make our country weaker.
"Now, I know some of you are surprised to hear me say it as plainly as that. You've had your suspicions all along, some of you. And others? Well, it's been more than simply suspicions. I can tell from your letters and your phone calls -- you've been pretty much convinced from the get-go that weakening our country is what this newspaper is all about.
"Well, I'm here to tell you that you're right, so why beat around the bush any longer? We might as well come right out and say it. Our primary goal -- the thing that motivates us 24/7 here at the Daily Treasoner -- is to tear this country down.
"Some people want to build it up? Not us. We want to tear it down.
"That's been our dream -- and I'm sure I speak for every member of our staff -- from the moment we first went into this profession: to do everything in our power to undermine our nation, undercut our leaders, and make us ripe for the picking by any enemy or evil madman, anywhere in the world, who's looking to do us harm.
"That's our mission, and we're proud of it.
"I'm sure some of you, when you chose careers, you went into the family business, whatever it happened to be, because you decided that family loyalty and tradition were the most important things to you. That's fine. And some of the rest of you? Well, maybe you picked careers you knew would make you the big bucks -- doctors, lawyers, whatever.
"Not us, though. We chose journalism, and we chose it precisely for the opportunity it gave us to ruin the country we all grew up in.
"That's why we got into the business, and that's why we've stayed at it year after year. It's why we cover the stories we cover, and it's why we write and edit our stories the way we write and edit them -- to only show the negative. And that's true whether it's the war in Iraq, or something the president says, or something right here at the city council -- we want to get people upset for no good reason, so they can keep our elected officials from doing their jobs.
"It's treason, but somebody's got to do it.
"So anyway, right about now, you're probably wondering: Does the Daily Treasoner come up with all these terrible stories, not to mention all these totally unpatriotic opinion columns, all by itself? I wish we could say that we do, but tearing down America is too big a job for any one newspaper. That's why we have a conference call every morning -- all the editors of all the newspapers coast to coast -- so we can decide the best way to hurt the country that day.
"And, of course, when it's something really special, we also get secret instructions from our controllers overseas: Bashir, Ahmad, Vladimir, Tsing-Lo. These are people -- and I've named just a few of them -- who are every bit as dedicated to America's downfall as we are, and they tell us step by step exactly what we're supposed to do to make it happen. That's a real time-saver!
"And speaking of time, I see mine is almost up. I know I've just touched on a few of the highlights here, but I hope I've given you at least a flavor of what we do and, even more important, why we do it. Destroying this country is what gets journalists up every morning, and what puts us to bed every night with smiles on our faces.
"Let's take a short break, and when we come back, we'll show you how we burn the flag."
Posted 10/22/06. Get the lowdown right here at "Rick's" -- and spread the word while there's still time!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rick Horowitz is a syndicated columnist, TV commentator, writing coach and public speaker.
Awwwwwww. Poor Rick. Feeling out of sorts because someone says the Drive By Media is biased. He feels the need to satirize the fact that a large segment of the American populace are of the opinion that many in the DBM are anti-American, err....maybe that should be pro-Internationalists, you know how the Lib's like to use PC terms to make their views more anti-septic to the uninitiated. Anyway here we go again with the don't judge our actions, our intentions are really what matters. Why, Libs aren't out to ruin America, they are trying to make it better, create a social Utopia, don't you know! That's why:
1.) God is bad and any reference to Him must be ridiculed and obliterated from public view.
2.)God fearing folks must be labeled extremist rubes, while secular socialists are heralded as mankind's new saviours.
3.) Babies are not really babies until a Doctor or some other outside influence slaps their a$$, resulting in their first breath. As such they enjoy no right to Life, Liberty or the pursuit of Liberal excess. Only convicted rapists and murderers are deserving of yet another chance to destroy innocent lives.
4.)Big Government Republican style is oppressive while Liberal Tyranny is nuturing, uplifting and a recourse for "social justice."
5.)The American Military person is the equivalent of Nazis, not very bright and unable to defeat any self declared enemy. Alas, it is the throat cutters that are gleefully reported as having provided social programs for the poor, thereby adding to their mystique of invincibility.
6.)Anal fisting is a joy that should be taught to all children in an effort to help America assimilate to the gay lifestyle. But hetero marriage is an antiquted notion that has done nothing but contirbute to the sorry state of the American woman's social status.
I could on and on but suffice it to say that I understand that to a Liberal mind, Lib ideas and actions are never treasonous nor injurious to a capitalist society. Well Rick, you convinced me. Think I'll get right on the horn to the NY Times and become a lifetime subscriber. Hope you feel a little better about yourself now. /s
LOGANSPORT, Ind. -- A convicted murderer on parole told investigators that he killed a 16-year-old co-worker Tuesday night after "a feeling came over him" when she stopped to help him on the side of a road, a sheriff's detective testfied at a probable cause hearing Thursday.
Danny R. Rouse, 51, who was released from a Kansas prison in March, admitted to strangling and stabbing Stephanie Faye Wagner on a roadside near her hometown of Royal Center, Ind., after the two had left their jobs at a restaurant in Winamac, Cass County sheriff's Detective Tom Wallace testified.
(snip)
Rouse was convicted in 1980 of murder and aggravated battery in the 1979 slaying of a 5-year-old boy and the stabbing of the child's mother in Wichita, Kansas. The mother survived and testified against him.
Rouse was paroled in March after spending 26 years in a Kansas prison. Upon his release, Rouse requested that he be allowed to move to Indiana. His parole supervision was then transferred to a South Bend parole office, 6News reported.
You have to admire his honesty.
LOL! Is that you Rick?
Just Kidding!
But.....bbbut, his mother was an alcoholic and his father used to collect newspapers for recycling because they were so poor. It's not his fault!
"And what are those responsibilities? In a phrase, to do everything we can to make our country weaker.
Here at the Daily Treasoner, we take our priviledges very seriously. "And what are those priviledges? In a phrase, to do everything we can to promote ourselves and our own interests.We could have gotten jobs or even started businesses to do concrete things such as policing or growing or distributing food, or making cars or exploring for oil or producing gasoline. But we like shooting fish in a barrel rather than exposing ourselves to the possibility of criticism by taking on actual responsibilities. So instead of undertaking to do something - anything - that someone needs done, we chose to criticize, condemn, complain, and second guess everyone who is stupid enough to do things and therefore to make mistakes.
Everyone else makes mistakes, but we never do - because we do exactly nothing. And if we say something today and find out that we were wrong, hey - whadda ya want, perfection or something? We're only human, and besides - who do you think you are, trying to criticize us when we are the ones who buy ink by the carload. So we just change the subject and that's the end of the story. Our mistake never happened. And don't try complaining to our competitors about our slant; our competitors may buy ink by the carload too, but so do we - and they aren't interested in fighting a flame war with us over a stupid nobody like you.
You think we are in the pockets of the liberal politicans, but that isn't true at all. We can make or break anybody, so we don't have to be in anyone's pocket. Now the liberal politicians, they are in someone's pocket. Ours. They know that we criticize everyone who actually does things, and so they do the same thing. They just act as our auxiliaries, scouting out people to second guess. Anybody who isn't for us is against us, and they had better watch out.
Kind of a hard wired human trait. Born of selfishness. Not a wholly unnecessary one either IMO. A bit of it used on an instinctive level goes along way in ensuring survival. Not tempered it becomes megalomania. I guess the question is fast becoming has Big Media become so enamored with itself that it fails to see that it's consumers no longer wish to "purchase" bias? Especially RED bias, no matter how much ink of any other color they dilute it with.
As I said on another thread recently, the problem is not that there's an overt leftist conspiracy in the media. The problem is that these guys do what they do without having to talk about it or even do all that much troublesome thinking about it before they do it.
promote ourselves and our own interests.
Kind of a hard wired human trait.
My point exactly - if you assume that journalists are not the paragons of virtue which they present themselves as but rather are selfish and cowardly, you can understand their behavior far better than if you try to start with an ideological assumption that "they say that because they are liberals." No, they say that because they are self-centered and cowardly, and the result is what gets called "liberal."Because they are cowardly, they have no interest in fighting a fair fight with someone else who "buys ink by the carload." Far better to cooperate - "I'll call you objective if you call me objective" - than to take up the challenge of actually trying to be objective. Do that, and first thing you know you will find yourself in the uncomfortable position of having to point out that the emperor isn't even wearing BVDs.
Cowardice and self-centeredness explains why journalists criticize not only the "capitalists" who provide our food, clothing, shelter, and fuel but also the police and military without which the socialist's beloved government could not exist as an effective institution. The defining characteristic of the target of the journalist is that they are competitors with journalists for the respect of the public but
- targets are vulnerable to journalistic attack because they do not buy ink by the carload, and
- targets don't defer to journalists when journalists (inevitably) project their fantasies onto the reality in which the target functions under a bottom line discipline.
BTTT
Arrogance of Mediacrats Bump!!!
In the absence of a shared societal subtext required by a joke Horowitz actually confesses his own sins.
Excellent observations as usual cIc; thanks for the ping.
Certainly the big newspapers are doing their worst, along with the other institutions you mention. But IMHO broadcast journalism is a unique case, in thatIn principle, given a strict constructionist SCOTUS, it would only take a civil suit against the FCC and its licensees to drastically reduce the pernicious influence of broadcast journalism. Certainly there are ample examples which demonstrate that broadcast journalism is tendentious. The key is to convince SCoTUS that the example of the biased print journalism is irrelevant because print journalism, being unlicensed and indubiably protected by the First Amendment, sets no precedent at all for what broadcast journalism may or may not do.
- broadcast journalism is unquestionably the most powerful propaganda arm of the left, and
- broadcast journalism, as the Clintonistas pointed out in the context of the ABC documentary on the lead in to 9-11, does not have First Amendment protection because broadcasting in general exists only because of censorship of those who do not have FCC licenses.
Why Broadcast Journalism is
Unnecessary and IllegitimateTake a look - it's a thread I started shortly after 911, and have continued to update since then.
Precisely.
But *that's* where The Associated Press -- a.ka The Associated Quislings -- *really* shines, their specialty.
~eh?
"And speaking of time, I see mine is almost up."
How right you are, Horowitz.
...how very right.
These guys???
Say it ain't so ;^)
On a related note, the diseased cash cow benefactors that fund the crAPweasels are experiencing some, er, cash flow problems. How long will they be able to maintain the crAPweasels in the fashion in which they have become accustomed??? The (more or less)free market is working its magic, eh?
HA!!
Yup, same ones. ;^)
"On a related note, the diseased cash cow benefactors that fund the crAPweasels are experiencing some, er, cash flow problems."
Really.
I've not been paying much attention, assumed it'll take time for the brain-bugs running AQ to destroy *it* so moved on to other, more personal matters.
Whatever deterioration the AQ's experienced apparently happened under my radar [read: schnozzola], and much faster than I'd anticipated.
Pray-tell, what've I missed?
"How long will they be able to maintain the crAPweasels in the fashion in which they have become accustomed???"
Long as the money holds out; which, unbeknownst to me is the issue. {Welcome to the future, Landru. :o) }
"The (more or less)free market is working its magic, eh?"
Maybe.
Our free market -- I've *learned* -- is a double edged sword.
As our language can be & has been used against our culture, so a free market can & has been used against our free market form of capitalism.
Crazy world.
As for The Associated Quislings go, *it* is a lot like a leech.
Can assume any shape, squeeze through even the smallest holes & as such is looking right now at *adapting* to whoever, or whatever it spies as it flees the *old* host to a new host.
What's the "new" host is anyones guess, only one thing's for sure.
...they won't be going away.
Well, if a picture's worth a thousand words; highlighting stock prices of three of their benefactors, nyt, Chicago Trib, and the compost:
The stock prices generally mirror the bottom lines of these seditious rags. IOW, the fishwraps are seeing their margins decreasing almost daily. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of Bolsheviks!
Ahem:
Oh, somewhere in this favored land the sun is shining bright.
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light.
And, somewhere men are laughing, and little children shout,
but there is no joy in Pressville - the mighty MSM has struck out.
Thankyew, thankyew ver much... ;^)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.