Singers: Prof. Stephen Jones went home to his wife
Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb
And showed her pages from his BYU Physics 911 hoax.
Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb
Posted on 10/30/2006 7:38:55 PM PST by neverdem
The standing ovation has finally died down, and Steven E. Jones, a soft-spoken physics professor, finds himself pinned against the stage by some of the enthusiastic fans who packed a University of Denver auditorium over the weekend to see him.
A man with a "Got truth?" T-shirt offers Jones a careful explanation for why the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center were operated by remote control. Another quizzes him about the size of the footprint of the Pentagon crash - too small, he says, for the Boeing 757 that "officially" smashed into it on Sept. 11, 2001.
"Can I just shake your hand?" a woman in a baggy red sweater asks Jones. "You're doing such important work."
If anything, Jones appears embarrassed by all the attention. Quiet and self-effacing, he's an unlikely hero for 9/11 conspiracy theorists of every stripe, but that's exactly what he's become.
A physicist whose background includes work on nuclear fusion, Jones was put on leave by Brigham Young University in September after publishing a paper saying that the twin towers couldn't have collapsed solely as a result of the planes that rammed the upper floors on Sept. 11. The paper theorizes that explosives planted inside the building must have been involved and that the buildings' collapse was essentially a controlled demolition.
Though Jones doesn't specify who he believes planted the charges, he concedes it would have had to be "an inside job" and likely would have included either very powerful figures on the American scene or entities inside the government.
"It's a thought that I admit has made me lose some sleep," Jones said.
Neither the 9/11 commission nor other extensive government reports have found any evidence of a secondary cause of the towers' collapse.
But Jones and his work reflect the mainstreaming of a movement that has defied the Bush administration's efforts to put it to rest and mystified people who have studied the events of that day closely: A startlingly large percentage of the population simply doesn't believe the official explanation for the towers' fall.
A national poll by the Scripps Survey Center at Ohio University conducted in the summer found that more than a third of people questioned believed the government either planned the attacks or could have stopped them but didn't.
That has worried government officials enough that the State Department recently published a report titled "The Top Sept. 11 Conspiracy Theories," an effort to debunk many of them. Separately, the National Institute of Standards and Technology - the government arm that investigated why the towers collapsed - published a seven-page document in September that attempted to answer some of the skeptics.
"We've watched it gain momentum," said Brent Blanchard, director of field operations for New Jersey-based Protec Documentation Services, which studies and monitors building demolitions.
"It's really been fascinating in a way," he said. "We've been able to watch the birth of the completely out-of-control allegations that could not be true for so many reasons."
Among the most basic of those, Blanchard said, is that there's a consensus that the collapse of the towers began at or near the point where the planes entered the buildings, rather than at the base, where traditional demolition occurs. That means that the explosives would have had to survive the initial crash and superheated fires until they were detonated - for nearly an hour in the case of one tower, 102 minutes in the case of the other.
"That's absolutely impossible," Blanchard said.
Beyond that, he said, planting the explosives in secret would have been an incredible logistical undertaking.
But to the growing Sept. 11 conspiracy movement, Jones provides what even advocates concede they had been lacking: a scientific approach backed up with meticulous data analysis and carefully devised experimental testing.
Jones - who has agreed to retire from BYU at the end of 2006 - said in an interview that his first doubts emerged when he saw a video of the collapse of World Trade Center 7, the 47- story office building that collapsed seven hours after the twin towers.
The collapse took just 6.5 seconds, only a half-second more than the free-fall time a ball bearing would take when dropped from that height. That simply couldn't take account of the normal resistance of steel columns and concrete that should have slowed the collapse by at least a few seconds, he said, but it did fit the model of a controlled demolition.
The physicist said that in more than a year of investigation, he found thermite residue in samples of dust found near ground zero and on one of the steel beams used in a Sept. 11 memorial. Thermite is a compound that, when ignited, produces incredibly high temperatures and is used by the military in incendiary grenades and to cut through steel.
Some government reports have also identified a significant presence of odd substances - including sulfur and zinc - and have noted that there is no obvious explanation for their presence. Jones said sulfur and zinc are part of a typical thermite fingerprint.
"I'm not willing to say yet that this is conclusive, but it does deserve explanation. What we're asking for is more study and a major investigation," said Jones, who has helped organize a group called Scholars for 9/11 Truth.
For many observers, Jones' work says less about a hidden conspiracy behind Sept. 11 than it does an unease with the event and what has followed.
"First of all, there is the event itself," said Christopher Farrell of the conservative think tank Judicial Watch. "It shocked, upset and offended people. Then after the fact, there were a number of contradictions or holes in the information available."
Blanchard is more blunt: "The government's done a lot of things in the last couple of years that has caused people to doubt their integrity about anything, including this stuff about WMD and other problems."
After Jones' lecture Saturday, a distinguished man with graying hair said he came because he had heard the physicist on the radio and thought it was remarkable that a scientist from so conservative a state as Utah would be a doubter.
"As you study this whole thing more, it seems to me there are a lot of valid questions," he said.
The man said he was a businessman and didn't want his name in the paper.
"I'm still in the business world," he said, "and I'd be ridiculed just for being here."
Staff writer Michael Riley can be reached at 303-954-1614 or mriley@denverpost.com.
There are plenty of nutjobs running loose. The law of averages dictates that at least some of them are nuts.
Kinda like Richard Hoagland seeing robot heads in all the photos taken on the moon and mars. Loopy.
"...more than a third of people questioned believed the government either planned the attacks..."
That would be your average rabid, Saddam-loving democrat...
"...or could have stopped them but didn't..."
...who can't bring themeselves to the see the connection between Clinton failing to nail Bin Laden, or advocating "firewalls" between the FBI and CIA impeding the tracking of terrorists, and the devastating consequence of 9-11.
But I guess blaming terrorists and our own poor policy decisions for bad outcomes just isn't exciting or "secret" enough for the maroons of the left.
Actually I'm a Dr Who and Eureka fan. They are a lot more believable than this maroon. ;)
It has been conclusively shown that Kyle caused 9/11.
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
Here is more specific info...
Geeez! This crap is toooooo weird even for the twilight zone.
Well, had our government (under Clinton's watch) nailed Osama, then I suppose we might have stopped the attack. I suppose, in that sense, we could say "our government could have stopped them but didn't".
The mainstreaming of 9/11 conspiracy insanity continues. Thanks, MSM.
ALL conspiracy theories/theorists are the same, IMO. From the Twin Towers, to the Pentagon, to the moon landings to JFK. They all involve a sinister government conspiracy that could never pull off what it is accused of doing. And in ALL cases, the REAL truth is much more plausible than any of their theories.
BYU should be applauded for sending this idiot on his way.
Rednecks who know 911 was real suddenly seem so much smarter than the intellectual college types. How ironic.
I thought that there had been a bit of a weeding out of the nutters, over there. I'll take your word for it, that that was just a rumor, spread by a few here. LOL
Hey Jones...
What are you, retarded?
Singers: Prof. Stephen Jones went home to his wife
Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb
And showed her pages from his BYU Physics 911 hoax.
Dumb dumb dumb dumb dumb
There was a time though that every Bush conspiracy theory was paraded as truth by the Loonies.
A Collection of Kooks, A levy of lunatics, a company of crazies, a mob of maniacs, etc etc etc.
Ok. Let's play along. If his only objection is that the planes could not have caused the collapse and that explosives had to have been involved - then why doesn't he posit that Al Quaeda smuggled explosives into the buildings. That would fit his theory more than the government did it.
Of course we know the reason he doesn't do this is he worked backwards. He posits the government did it - then invented theories to explain that.
And yet...they did. Go figure.
Oh please. He's quiet and self-effacing until there's a television camera somewhere in a 300-mile radius.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.