Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stem cell breakthrough for breast cancer patients
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | October 29, 2006 | Staff

Posted on 10/29/2006 9:21:37 AM PST by MadIvan

Scientists hope to rebuild breasts using stem cells to grow new ones, it has emerged.

The technique could see an end to reconstructive surgery for women recovering from breast cancer.

Scientists in the US are looking at using stem cells derived from a patient's own fat to regenerate lost breast tissue.

An initial three-year programme of animal research will see stem cells "seeded" on to scaffold structures.

These will provide platforms around which replacement tissue can be grown.

Stem cells are cells at an early stage of development which can be directed to produce different kinds of tissue.

Experts believe they hold out great promise for the treatment of a host of conditions in which lost or diseased tissue needs to be replaced.

Dr Peter Rubin, a research leader from the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in the US, said: "The surgical options for breast reconstruction involve either the use of implants or a procedure whereby fat tissue taken from another part of the body is shaped into the form of a breast. Neither is ideal nor without risk.

"The use of adipose, or fat, derived stem cells may represent a better solution for soft tissue reconstruction in breast cancer patients."

Laboratory experiments have already demonstrated the versatility of fat-derived stem cells.

Exposed to specific chemical conditions, they develop into cells characteristic of fat, bone, cartilage, nerve, muscle and blood vessels.

Preliminary tests indicate that the stem cells easily attach to the beads and are able to differentiate into mature fat cells.

Injected under the skin of lab rats, they form mounds of tissue.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: adiposetissue; adultstemcells; breastcancer; fatcells; stemcells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Note: it's adult stem cells.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 10/29/2006 9:21:39 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 10/29/2006 9:22:03 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I can research for this quickly being diverted into plastic surgery.


3 posted on 10/29/2006 9:24:11 AM PST by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; neverdem


4 posted on 10/29/2006 9:25:18 AM PST by bitt ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"ANOTHER SCIENTIFIC BREAKTHROUGH BROUGHT TO YOU BY EMBRYONIC STEM CELL ... "

"uh, yes? what was that you said?"

"mmmm, it WASN'T ESCR?"

"from their own bodies you say?"


"NEVER MIND"

5 posted on 10/29/2006 9:28:34 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Well than it just doesn't count. It only matters if you can created life and than rip it apart for experiments. Just ask Michael J. Frankenstein.


6 posted on 10/29/2006 9:28:37 AM PST by SHOOT THE MOON bat ("I ain't got a dime but what i got is mine. I ain't rich but Lord I'm free." George Strait)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Stories like this should get even abortionists to say that stem cell research needs to be focused on adult stem cells. How many treatments have been discovered using embryonic stem cells? I think the only thing embryonic stem cells have been shown to produce successfully are babies. And that's if you leave the embryo in the womb.
7 posted on 10/29/2006 9:29:01 AM PST by darthxenu (Give peace a chance - end jihad now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

My thought exactly. Why, not sure their even starting with breast cancer patients. If they went right to the 'plastic surgury' market, overnite they could completely fund every cancer known and not known to man.


8 posted on 10/29/2006 9:30:22 AM PST by C210N (Bush SPIED, Terrorists DIED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: darthxenu
I think the only thing embryonic stem cells have been shown to produce successfully are babies. And that's if you leave the embryo in the womb.

From what I've read, embryonic stem cells are 'successful' in creating cancers at quite an impressive rate.

9 posted on 10/29/2006 9:37:12 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

I also NOTE how they go to great lengths to avoid stating the it is ADULT stem cells. This way they leave the readers confused and go about raising money for EMBYRONIC stem cell research. They want to steal your money and give you false hope through EMBYRONIC stem cells - all the while bemoaning how it COULD help and it COULD be promising - knowing that there is NO promise with EMPRYONIC stem cell research.

In short they want to muddy the water. The godless are mean and nasty. They ENJOY seeing people give money towards NO HOPE and certain demise through disease.


10 posted on 10/29/2006 9:37:34 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

bttt


11 posted on 10/29/2006 9:38:25 AM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Note: it's adult stem cells.

It always is!

12 posted on 10/29/2006 9:38:30 AM PST by airborne (If Democrats win in November, America will suffer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darthxenu

" == I think the only thing embryonic stem cells have been shown to produce successfully are babies. == "

Unfortunately, not true. They also reproduce without limit, and produce aggressive tumors in great abundance.


13 posted on 10/29/2006 9:38:46 AM PST by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: darthxenu
"Stories like this should get even abortionists to say that stem cell research needs to be focused on adult stem cells."

No way! Abortionists are in the business of destroying babies any way they can. Embryonic stem cells are fertilized eggs - this is another way to destroy a baby. Plus they may be able to make some money off of embryonic stem cell research through harvesting eggs and fertilizing them - more money and the result is the same - one or more less babies destroyed.
14 posted on 10/29/2006 9:40:22 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MainFrame65
"They also reproduce without limit, and produce aggressive tumors in great abundance."

Absolutely true!

Embryonic stem cells have no promise except that of being a medical nightmare and a paradise for disease. Perhaps God is telling us something ... .
15 posted on 10/29/2006 9:41:51 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
MadIvan, whens the BIG day?

;)

P.S. We also need more conservative kiddies ... ah, after the BIG day!
16 posted on 10/29/2006 9:43:23 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

That's very exciting for women who have had, or will get breast cancer. It's amazing at all of the things that stem cell research has shown. Hopefully, they will be able to use this same kind of research to combat diseases without having to use aborted babies.


17 posted on 10/29/2006 9:43:53 AM PST by sokit2mebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sokit2mebb
"Hopefully, they will be able to use this same kind of research to combat diseases without having to use aborted babies."

They already have!

THIS article is about ADULT STEM CELLS; NOT EMBROYNIC STEM CELLS! NOTE the difference and where the success has been and continues to be - with ADULT STEM CELLS!
18 posted on 10/29/2006 9:45:42 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nmh
MadIvan, whens the BIG day?

Soon.

P.S. We also need more conservative kiddies ... ah, after the BIG day!

First, we need a house to put them in. That is in progress.

Regards, Ivan

19 posted on 10/29/2006 9:50:41 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

It's not big news. These aren't embryonic stem cells.

However, I expect the coming articles by the MSM to cite this as a benefit of stem cell research (they will conveniently obscure the difference between embryonic and adult stem cells as they always do) and then tear into the Republicans and Rush for opposing such research with lines like they would rather see women suffer than support the research. Wait for it.


20 posted on 10/29/2006 9:51:43 AM PST by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson