Posted on 10/26/2006 11:28:10 AM PDT by aculeus
Scientists from the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, and the University of Chicago have uncovered a remarkably well-preserved fossil lamprey from the Devonian period that reveals today's lampreys as "living fossils" since they have remained largely unaltered for 360 million years.
Scientists from the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa, and the University of Chicago have uncovered a remarkably well-preserved fossil lamprey from the Devonian period that reveals today's lampreys as "living fossils" since they have remained largely unaltered for 360 million years. The scientists describe the new find in the article, "A lamprey from the Devonian of South Africa," to be published in the Oct. 26, 2006, issue of Nature. (Image courtesy of University of Chicago Medical Center) Chicago's Michael Coates, PhD, joined Witwatersrand's Bruce Rubidge, PhD, and graduate student and lead author Rob Gess to describe the new find in the article, "A lamprey from the Devonian of South Africa" to be published in the Oct. 26, 2006, issue of Nature.
"Apart from being the oldest fossil lamprey yet discovered, this fossil shows that lampreys have been parasitic for at least 360 million years," said Rubidge, director of the Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research.
Lampreys are long, eel-like parasites that attach themselves to and feed on other fish. Of the 46,000 known species of vertebrates, lampreys and hagfish are the only surviving jawless vertebrates. Lampreys are the most "primitive" of the vertebrates, meaning that they are the least changed from the first vertebrates. Besides lacking jaws, lampreys have no paired pectoral and pelvic fins, and no scales.
"This fossil changes how we look at lampreys today," said Coates, associate professor of organismal biology and anatomy. "They're very ancient, very primitive animals, yet with highly specialized feeding habits."
It reveals that the anatomical evolution of lampreys is more conservative than scientists thought, Coates added. Although they've gotten slightly longer, they specialized early and successfully and thus appeared to have stayed much the same for the past 360 million years.
"This discovery is a monument to the dedication and passion of [Gess], who has spent many months patiently excavating and unearthing the elusive secrets from the prehistoric past," Rubidge said.
Gess found the new specimen, Priscomyzon riniensis, 18 months ago in an ancient estuary in Grahamstown, South Africa. Preserved showing the underside, the fossil measures less than 2 inches long and reveals a set of 14 teeth surrounding the mouth that is proportionately larger than its descendents today.
"The most striking feature of Priscomyzon is its large oral disc, edged with a soft outer lip, supported by an annular cartilage, and surrounding a circular mouth," the authors wrote. "This is the first clear evidence of a Palaeozoic lamprey with an oral disc."
According to the scientists, this find greatly adds to what was a severely limited lamprey fossil record and, for the first time, places the origin of modern lamprey morphology deep within the Palaeozoic period. It adds essential new detail to the emerging and changing picture of early vertebrate evolution.
Until now, the lamprey fossil record included only those that show a side view but reveal little of the gill basket and feeding apparatus. However, earlier this year, Nature reported on a freshwater lamprey fossil found in the Jehol biota of China (Inner Mongolia) from the Early Cretaceous period (about 125 million years ago).
The newly discovered South African fossil shows that these anatomically specialized fish are "holdovers" from ancient marine ecosystems, Coates said. Obviously exceptional survivors, these animals predate the advent of modern fish and have survived at least four major extinction events.
"There are few representatives of these early branches in vertebrate evolution that are still around today," Coates said, which is why so much scientific attention has been paid to lampreys. Although highly specialized in their own right, these primitive animals are used as surrogate ancestors for comparative research on living jawed vertebrates.
"It gives us a calibration point," Coates said. "We study lampreys because, in many respects, they're so primitive. They never had jaws, they never had [true] teeth, they never had fins, they never had limbs. Lampreys provide a glimpse of conditions early in vertebrate evolutionary history."
Because lampreys do not have bone or any substantial cartilage, they are extremely rare as fossils. This fossil not only reveals a nearly complete soft tissue impression, but it also pushes back their fossil record another 35 million years.
"These are pretty insubstantial animals," Coates said. "Lacking a boney skeleton, they rot down, leaving no hard parts, like a skull or ribs. So if a fossil site is discovered that yields impressions of the delicate remains of these animals, then this site needs to be explored thoroughly for other examples of exceptional preservation."
The scientists will continue to sort through much of the indeterminate material that is emerging from the ongoing dig.
Nearly 50 species of lampreys are found today in temperate rivers and coastal seas. Some species live in fresh water for their entire lives, but most are anadromous, hatching in fresh water, migrating to the ocean to grow and mature, and migrating back to fresh water to spawn and reproduce.
When adult lampreys return to fresh water, they stop feeding during winter and spawn the following spring. Eggs hatch after approximately three weeks and become blind larvae, called ammocoetes. After four to seven years, the ammocoetes metamorphose into juvenile lampreys called macropthalmia, which migrate out to the ocean and become parasitic adult lampreys, living just a year or two and growing up to 2 feet long.
Abundant in the Northeast United States, lampreys have a sucker-like mouth with a ring of cartilage that supports the rim of the mouth. It fastens on to a living fish with its teeth, rasps at the host's soft tissues with its piston-like tongue, produces strands of mucus to trap the food and feeds on the body fluids. A fish attacked by lampreys may be severely injured or even killed.
Copyright © 1995-2006 ScienceDaily LLC
Evolution needs to get its stories straight. Constantly revising is not an answer.
Where did you get that idea?
I used my unevolved brain.
Since rocks don't need to fall of cliffs, I guess none ever have. That's what I got out of that.
I thought all vertebrates by definition had back bones. But ...
Chordates with a cartilaginous spine.
Yes! They were quite successful in finding a valuable niche and exploited it against all-comers.
Back to the books for evolutionists.
Nonsense. See my Post #17. We used this in my previously mentioned Zoology class as one of the classic anatomical lessons in the evolutionary chain of life on this planet. Evolutionists have no problem whatsoever with this organism since it once again bolsters the TOE as it represents a stepping-stone on the way to man.
First: They represent the evolutionary link between the Invertebrate and Vertebrate Phyla since they have a primitive (cartilage) backbone.
Second: A further common ancestor went on to become the sharks and rays, which eventually evolved into fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, primates, man.
Since a lamprey didn't need to evolve this means that humans didn't either. That's what I get out of this.
Extremely poor logic [*LOL*]. I suggest, much the same as I took long ago, a Year-long Zoology course to open your mind to the wonders of Evolution.
Hope this helps. Best of luck with your coursework!
No reason? No reason? So you are implying evolution is intellegently directed.
A 'Living Fossil': 360 Million-year-old Fish Hasn't Evolved Much
And why hasn't it evolved much?...C'mon say it..."Because evolution is a fairy-tale."
Bill Clinton would hit it.
sure looks like an attorney to me.
No reason = no pressure on it in the form of scarce resources, competition for resources, predators, or environmental changes that influence its development. Meanwhile, mutations that have also found their own niches have evolved into present day forms of sharks, eels, etc.
Hey, don't insult Lampreys!
Two comments:
First, it's misleading to say that the lampreys "haven't evolved". Some of their descendants have a very similar shape to their remote ancestors, that's all you can say. Those descendants may well have changed in many ways that aren't reflected in their morphology, but morphology is all that the fossil record preserves.
Second, if the shape of the lamprey is sufficiently well suited for its ecological niche, evolution will necessarily act to preserve that shape. Lampreys are born all the time with a slightly different shape, but as that shape is less well suited for the niche, those "hopeful monsters" will be weeded out over time.
It really is simple, and almost obvious, if you think about it.
No. Absent any environmental factor pushing evolution in any direction, each generation of an organism will have roughly the same allele frequencies as its parent. Obviously there will be some genetic drift over time, but if the organism has a successful niche, then there's no ecological advantage to evolving.
*LOL*
"Abundant in the Northeast United States, lampreys have a sucker-like mouth with a ring of cartilage that supports the rim of the mouth. It fastens on to a living fish with its teeth, rasps at the host's soft tissues with its piston-like tongue, produces strands of mucus to trap the food and feeds on the body fluids."
Northeastern US socialists' behavior.
"First, it's misleading to say that the lampreys "haven't evolved". Some of their descendants have a very similar shape to their remote ancestors, that's all you can say. Those descendants may well have changed in many ways that aren't reflected in their morphology, but morphology is all that the fossil record preserves."
I don't know...that sounds pretty weak. Concerning the many changes you speculated about, what kind of things are you referring to? What else is there to a lamprey? There isn't much left when you take out morphology. Eye color or personality?
And think I stated correctly "hasn't changed much" not "hasn't evolved".
Sincerely.
I think a lot of people have trouble discussing this because they're going back along one line - the line from the lamprey we know today versus the fossil record of 360 million years ago. If we start from the fossil record and move forward, it's easier to describe it in terms of one line remaining relatively unchanged over time because it hasn't had much pressure to change, while other descendants have indeed shown some evolutionary influences due to mutations that have proved equally or more successful compared to the original model.
"Second, if the shape of the lamprey is sufficiently well suited for its ecological niche, evolution will necessarily act to preserve that shape. Lampreys are born all the time with a slightly different shape, but as that shape is less well suited for the niche, those "hopeful monsters" will be weeded out over time."
I sure have a hard time understanding how something could maintain an ecological niche through 360,000,000 years of climate fluctuations, catastrophic events, and extinction events.
When all you have to do is suck off of someone else's resources, you don't have to evolve much.
This also explains why liberals are still around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.