Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StayoutdaBushesWay

No, she said enshrining cloning in the Missouri Constitution could led to the exploitation of poor women, who feel pressure to harvest their eggs to make some money. She pointed out that this is a painful and dangerous proceedure.

MJF's name was never mentioned, by anyone. It's not about MJF it's about amendment two.


41 posted on 10/26/2006 8:44:11 AM PDT by mockingbyrd (Good heavens! What women these Christians have-----Libanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: mockingbyrd
No, she said enshrining cloning in the Missouri Constitution could led to the exploitation of poor women, who feel pressure to harvest their eggs to make some money. She pointed out that this is a painful and dangerous proceedure.

I agree with her completely. I also believe that the harvesting of eggs for money is immoral and unethical. Cloning is the issue here...which is exactly what this Amendment 2 is all about. The political ad by Michael J. Fox completely distorts that fact. I'll go so far as to say that he outright LIES about it (lie of ommission at least) in his ad.

Cloning is not only immoral but it is just CREEPY...and shouldn't even be under consideration. These are human lives that are being talked about as if they are some sort of experiment or innocuous object. These embryos are HUMAN BEINGS at their earliest stages which amendment two would allow to be cloned and used for lab experimantation. It's vile and disgusting and creepy.

These people don't believe in God but they want to play God.

72 posted on 10/26/2006 9:45:26 AM PDT by blinachka (Vechnaya Pamyat Daddy... xoxo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson