[presidio9]

ping

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Click FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search for a list of all related articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

[Neoliberalnot]

Of course, a slow moving turtle sees this transparent attempt to paint the sameness of both parties when it comes to welcoming the deviants and perverts. Many voters have rejected the left wing whacko RAT party because of the fact they "openly" support the deviants, deviant marriage, the homopeds, caprophiles, beastophiles, the genitaly mutilated, etc. This story and the foley story is about convincing the weak-minded that this is not an excuse to avoid the RAT party -- see, the republicans do it too.

[stompk]

"How can you be gay and be in the Republican Party?"

indeed. almost as bad as the "gay christians" :-(

[TheBigB]

"I believe in the basic tenets — limited government, individual rights, a strong economy and national defense," he said

Works for me.

[NutCrackerBoy]

This is a transparent attempt by a major media outlet to hurt one party. Essentially by outing its members. John Kerry suffered for doing something like that in the debate.

[antiRepublicrat]

Not everybody's single-issue. It sounds like a simple value judgement to me -- should a gay person with otherwise strongly Republican principles (classic Repub, not most of the jokers in office now) deny all those principles and go with the Dims just because one Republican platform point happens to negatively affect him?

I have to admire gays going with principles that affect all of Americans, not just the gay minority.

[unspun]

[longtermmemmory]

"Anti-gay Republicans want a narrow agenda that only 25 to 30 percent of Americans actually agree with," Sammon said. "Republican officeholders are shrewd enough to understand that's a losing strategy, that the party risks being on the wrong side of history."


Newsflash to the homosexuals, opposing sexual deviants is the winning side of the equation. This is why democrats are throwing the homosexuals under the bus this election cycle.

This is also to build sympathy for the pro-homosexual amendment in colorado which seeks to create "homosexual marriage" in all but the name. There is one referendum that must be voted down.

[itsahoot]

Instead of an all-welcoming "big tent," the GOP "is more of a revival tent," Wolfe said. "It has chased out more and more gay Republicans."

One can always hope. The big tent is a morass. (That could be a pun I guess)

[Maeve]

A Pink Nazi is a Pink Nazi: it matters not whether they call themselves Republican or Democrat. Trust a Pink Nazi like you would trust a Muslim with a rocket launcher.

[Antoninus]

AP Article. You can't spell PRAVDA without A and P.

That said, the GOP needs to get serious about kicking out the "out and proud" homos, or they're just asking for an @ss whomping at the polls.

And the Dems know it, which is why they're stirring the pot on this issue.

[longtermmemmory]

Homosexual Republican is about a valid as saying "Bill Clinton home for unwed mothers."

[gidget7]

?? Family values are NOT radical. If a homosexual is in the Republican party to bring the party out of some sort of bias, they are in fact Democrats. I have no problem with anyone who supports and believes in freedom of speech, freedom of association, etc, and family values, being a Republican in office. I don't support those who do not. And I am anything but radical.

[Ultra Sonic 007]

[Old Professer]

Gay population explosion underway right in front of our noses and we never noticed a thing.

[NicknamedBob]

"It would be easy for me to go to the Democrats — they court me on a daily basis," Koering said. "But my home is in the Republican Party. I'm not going to let the people with a radical agenda kick me out."

It isn't radical to respect treaditional marriage, or to seek to preserve one's social traditions. What is radical is to seek to change them without regard to the potential damage it could do to society.

Most people are okay with the existence of other-respecting gays who do not wish to impose their lifestyle and its implicatins in a confrontational manner. "Your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins", and your right to swing in any other manner should be equally circumspect.

[Dumb_Ox]

Further proof that Republicans only end up conserving leftist advances. The leadership's embrace of gays is probably more genuine than its embrace of the moral traditionalists who do most of the grunt work and get the least benefit but most of the opprobium.

Politics is the art of being compromised.

[Deport Billary]

It's past time for the GOP to welcome gays into the party. Social views have changed dramatically over the last 30 years. Most people view it as an acceptable lifestyle, especially the <40 crowd.

[traditional1]