Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon: New Class Of Silent Submarines Poses Threat
NBC4.TV ^ | October 19, 2006 | Chuck Henry

Posted on 10/20/2006 12:01:51 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Pentagon: New Class Of Silent Submarines Poses Threat

POSTED: 6:54 pm PDT October 19, 2006 UPDATED: 6:15 am PDT October 20, 2006

SAN DIEGO, Calif. -- The Pentagon said it believes the greatest undersea threat facing the U.S. Navy since the end of the Cold War has arrived.

The threat involves a new a new class of silent submarines -- subs that the U.S. Navy is having trouble finding under water. In this exclusive investigation, NBC4's Chuck Henry looked into one of those submarines in San Diego.

Following is a verbatim script from the on-air report.

CHUCK HENRY: The threat is real. And it has the Navy so concerned that it's turning to Sweden for help. That's because the Swedes have those silent submarines.

And right now, one of them is stationed at Point Loma. Earlier this month, NBC4 had unprecedented access to the Swedish sub and its crew.

What NBC4 aired few people have ever seen and certainly not in the United States.

On the surface it looks like any other submarine, but the U.S. Navy said it could be the most dangerous sub in the world.

FREDERICK LINDEN: Being noisy is something that is dangerous for us.

HENRY: Fredrick Linden is the commander of the HMS Gotland. He and his crew of 29 call the sub base at Point Loma home. They came to San Diego because the Navy is worried about this new generation of silent subs.

The Pentagon leased the Gotland for one year, but now has extended the lease for a second year, as they try to learn why this submarine so difficult to find underwater.

Subs have always had two weaknesses: they make noise and can't stay submerged very long. But the Gotland runs on a high-tech system called Air Independent Propulsion -- or AIP.

LINDEN: With AIP, I can stay submerged for weeks.

HENRY: Not only can the sub stay submerged for up to a month, the AIP technology also makes it quieter than other subs, and almost impossible to pick up on sonar.

When the Gotland wants to be silent and undetectable, especially along coastal waters, there's not a place it can't go. And that's one of the reasons it's here.

Since last summer the Navy has spent months playing a game of cat and mouse with the Gotland off San Diego, and time after time the Swedish sub has eluded its pursuers.

HENRY (TO COMMANDER): As an adversary, how good are you at what you do?

LINDEN: Very good.

HENRY: Can you tell us about your accomplishments?

LINDEN: We are satisfied with being good.

HENRY: According to Swedish newspapers, in training exercises the Gotland has sunk our most sophisticated nuclear submarines. But perhaps even more disconcerting, it reportedly sunk our largest aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Reagan.

NORMAN POLMAR, NAVAL ANALYST: She's really run rings around our carrier groups.

HENRY: Norman Polmar is a military analyst specializing in naval intelligence. He says since the end of the cold war, funding of the navy's anti submarine warfare program has been scaled back dramatically.

As the U.S. funnels billions into the war on terror, countries like North Korea, China and Iran are building or trying to get submarines like the Gotland.

Two months ago in the Persian Gulf, Iran tested a new anti-ship missile fired by one of its subs.

If the Iranians are successful in getting a Gotland-class submarine, it could pose a new silent danger to vital oil tanker traffic in the region.

POLMAR: With more of these submarines being bought by countries that don't particularly like us, Iran being a good example, yes, there is a potential. There is a threat.

HENRY: And the commander of the Gotland knows just how vulnerable the United States could be if a sub like his fell into the wrong hands.

HENRY: If you look at our coast, North America, is there any place that you can't go?

LINDEN: No.

HENRY: No place?

Linden then shakes his head.

HENRY: Although this emerging undersea threat is a top priority for the U.S. Navy, the U.S. is committed to its nuclear submarine force, and has no plans to develop subs like the Gotland.

The Navy says it just wants to know how to detect and kill them.

Copyright 2006 by NBC4


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Germany; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; coldwar2; hmsgotland; nato; pentagon; russia; sovietunion; submarines; sweden; ussronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

1 posted on 10/20/2006 12:01:51 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Don't the Russians also have a hard to track sub??


2 posted on 10/20/2006 12:04:08 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I'm skeptical...


3 posted on 10/20/2006 12:05:43 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Its called the Kirsk, damn near silent.


4 posted on 10/20/2006 12:07:00 PM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid. It's also WWIV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The news package alone, which I saw on MSNBC this morning, was scary enough.


5 posted on 10/20/2006 12:08:19 PM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (Karl Rove you magnificent bastard!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

This is serious stuff.

And Norman Polmar is a guy to listen to. He's smart and a no nonsense kinda guy.

I am sure we'll adapt our boats to counter this threat. Question is when?


6 posted on 10/20/2006 12:08:35 PM PDT by RexBeach (Will Rogers Never Met Bill Clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: east1234

Russia also has a supersonic torpedo and plasma stealth for it's aircraft.


7 posted on 10/20/2006 12:09:10 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90

Their Kilo class boats are hard to track,but the Gotland is superior to it in most respects.But even the Gotland is being relegated to the background as Germany,France & even Russia bring out new SSK designs with more effecient & higher endurance AIP modules than the Gotland's liquid oxygen/diesel system.


8 posted on 10/20/2006 12:09:53 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

sceptical of??


9 posted on 10/20/2006 12:10:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

WARNING! WARNING!

10 posted on 10/20/2006 12:11:42 PM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
I'm skeptical...

Don't be. Diesel electric subs on batteries are notoriously hard to track because there is almost nothing putting out noise, the only way to passively track submarines. AIP subs are just as hard to track for the same reason, and add to that their underwater endurance is counted in weeks and not days. The sub that's quieter is the sub that wins, nuclear or not.

Now bear in mind this a technologically advanced sub from a highly industrialized country manned by a skilled, professional crew. And I cannot emphasize the quality of the crew enough, the best sub in the world is worthless if you put a bunch of amatures onboard it. Having Gotland on hand is an excellent idea for training, because if you can beat them then you have truly beaten the best at the business with the platform you're training against.

11 posted on 10/20/2006 12:11:50 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
According to the NBC report last night, the US Navy is having no luck. The Gotland sank a US Nuke sub and the USS Ronald Reagan is war games.
12 posted on 10/20/2006 12:15:57 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

I understand that acoustics are still the primary means of detection. But, don't we also now detect magnetically...and via ultra-low frequency acoustics (subsonic physical disturbance)?


13 posted on 10/20/2006 12:15:58 PM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Paging Commander Bond! England needs you to steal the Stromberg submarine tracking system!


14 posted on 10/20/2006 12:16:39 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
For a minute I thought this might be about our friends at Toshiba again.
15 posted on 10/20/2006 12:19:35 PM PDT by FReepaholic (This tagline could indicate global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
I would imagine all training, history of the last 60 years of submarine hunting is based upon the premise that the captain and crew want to escape and live. I wonder what the tactual difference is when a crew is thinking Allah Akbar ?
16 posted on 10/20/2006 12:25:15 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler

tactual = tactical


17 posted on 10/20/2006 12:26:08 PM PDT by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Mariner
I'm fairly confident that NBC is clueless about our true capabilities in anti-submarine warfare.
19 posted on 10/20/2006 12:27:28 PM PDT by AIM-54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Remains-of-WWI-Aussie-soldiers-found/2006/09/18/1158431647127.html


20 posted on 10/20/2006 12:27:40 PM PDT by Charlespg (Peace= When we trod the ruins of Mecca and Medina under our infidel boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson