Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Secret Letter From Iraq
Time/CNN ^ | 10/6/2006 | Anon

Posted on 10/18/2006 9:55:49 AM PDT by Dick Bachert

The Secret Letter From Iraq A Marine's letter home, with its frank description of life in "Dante's inferno," has been circulating through generals' in-boxes. We publish it here with the author's approval

Written last month, this straightforward account of life in Iraq by a Marine officer was initially sent just to a small group of family and friends. His honest but wry narration and unusually frank dissection of the mission contrasts sharply with the story presented by both sides of the Iraq war debate, the Pentagon spin masters and fierce critics. Perhaps inevitably, the "Letter from Iraq" moved quickly beyond the small group of acquantainaces and hit the inboxes of retired generals, officers in the Pentagon, and staffers on Capitol Hill. TIME's Sally B. Donnelly first received a copy three weeks ago but only this week was able to track down the author and verify the document's authenticity. The author wishes to remain anonymous but has allowed us to publish it here ¡ª with a few judicious omissions.

Go here http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1543658,00.html for complete story

(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; military; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: rhombus
You stereotype too many with the over-used "chicken hawk" term. It's a device invented by liberals who don't respect those who volunteered to serve.

A chicken hawk is someone who talks tough militarily and advocates military action, but has never served a day in his life.

41 posted on 10/18/2006 11:25:09 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

I would but I was ejected from DU for asking a question.

So much for their sacred "diversity."


42 posted on 10/18/2006 11:33:41 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
This letter was not written last month as the Times states!

I read this letter at least four or five months ago. I know this because I printed out a copy to give to my brother. If I remember correctly it was about this Marine's first seven months in Iraq during 2005 not 2006!

This is either an example of sloppy journalism or the author of the piece knowingly changed the date in the letter. Would not the story be a bit stale if this letter were actually written a year ago and not last month as stated?

Then again, without revealing the letter writer's indentity there is no way to verify this actually was written by a Marine at all!

43 posted on 10/18/2006 11:35:22 AM PDT by mort56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
I would but I was ejected from DU for asking a question. So much for their sacred "diversity."

I'm not surprised. Of course they are not really for diversity just as they are not really supportive of Vets. Honestly I don't know who really invented the term chickenhawk but Democrats have used this term to no end as if to say anyone who didn't serve has no right to have an opinion on the use of the military. Now, we all know this is NOT the way this country was set up and honorable Vets like Washington made sure of that. Further, the Vets that the Democrats claim to support: John Kerry, Wesley Clark, John McCain etc are NOT above question simply because they were in the military. All too often the word chickenhawk is used to shut up or shut down non-Vets from expressing an opinion...at least that's how the Democrats have used the term. I don't expect that's what you meant to do.

44 posted on 10/18/2006 11:45:12 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: mort56
I read this letter at least four or five months ago. I know this because I printed out a copy to give to my brother. If I remember correctly it was about this Marine's first seven months in Iraq during 2005 not 2006!

He specifically mentions his unit rescuing the news babe from Christian Science Monitor. IIRC, that was just a few months back, not in 2005.

45 posted on 10/18/2006 11:54:16 AM PDT by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

The letter was written by the G-2 of the Marine division that was in Iraq at the time evidently.

Not sure what he means about O'Reilly as I don't watch O'Reilly much. What does O'Reilly say about Iraq?


46 posted on 10/18/2006 11:54:57 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

were = weren't in my original post.

Sorry!

What I get for freeping on a blackberry on another phone.


47 posted on 10/18/2006 12:12:13 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: American_Centurion

See my correction.

Amazing what a two letter typo can do to a post.

Duh.


48 posted on 10/18/2006 12:12:55 PM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Lezahal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
I've looked over the letter and a few things don't seem to ring true.

Normally, Marines go for a six month tour and soldiers for a year. It's soldiers who get leave at six months and return to Iraq. Marines don't.

If it was a second tour Marine, he wouldn't call that period at home leave, because it's not leave.

There is an exception to the general rule, but I'll keep that close to the vest because I smell a rat.

49 posted on 10/18/2006 12:27:00 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
And, yes, I served in the USAF during the early days of Nam so I ALSO have the right to an opinion in the matter.

Army: Hooah

USMC: Urah

USAF: What time's the club open?

50 posted on 10/18/2006 12:30:43 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

Written by a Marine, or by a Communist News Network operative embedded within the Marines?


51 posted on 10/18/2006 12:34:26 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
G.W.Bush (who sorta hung out in the 'Bama Air Guard during the Nam thing)

So you were in the USAF? Did you fly? In what?

I'm willing to bet that Bush risked his life flying the F-106 more than you did.

52 posted on 10/18/2006 12:34:56 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: is_is

I thought it was a good read. I thank the marine for sharing his thoughts with us, now as for the last line, I won't kiss a cop,but I will flush a toilet and drink a beer for him.


53 posted on 10/18/2006 12:34:59 PM PDT by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Time is working over-Time to undermine the war.


54 posted on 10/18/2006 12:36:21 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
I suspect that it's a bit of white propoganda. It's smart enough to not be so heavy handed as the libs normally are. Give your side a few shots to make your shots against the other side, your main objective, look credible.

It's not uncommon to give up outdated classified information to make a double agent look good. Similar ploy here is my opinion.

55 posted on 10/18/2006 12:38:07 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GOP_1900AD
I suspect that it's a bit of white propoganda. It's smart enough to not be so heavy handed as the libs normally are. Give your side a few shots to make your shots against the other side, your main objective, look credible.

It's not uncommon to give up outdated classified information to make a double agent look good. Similar ploy here is my opinion.

56 posted on 10/18/2006 12:38:15 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Yes indeed. Even among officers, I have not met too many Marines who use British expressions in everyday coms. That is quite suspicious. Note that a major effort to undermine the war has risen up over the past month, from certain elements in the UK. Over the past month, a number of them have also joined FR.


57 posted on 10/18/2006 12:38:57 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

The most frightening and discouraging part of the letter is:


"Favorite Iraqi TV Show — Oprah. I have no idea. They all have satellite TV."


58 posted on 10/18/2006 12:39:55 PM PDT by Cecily (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Raoul

"I've looked over the letter and a few things don't seem to ring true.
Normally, Marines go for a six month tour and soldiers for a year. It's soldiers who get leave at six months and return to Iraq. Marines don't.

If it was a second tour Marine, he wouldn't call that period at home leave, because it's not leave."

Marines normaly serve a 7 month tour in Iraq, but the Marines assigned to whatever Division, Wing, or MEF Hq serve the entire 14 month rotation of that Hq, and can take up to 20 days annual leave. There is nothing in this letter to indicate it wasn't written by a Marine. The author's sentiments ring true.

Semper Fi


59 posted on 10/18/2006 1:13:04 PM PDT by sean327 (God created all men equal, then some become Marines!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sean327
There is an exception to the general rule, but I'll keep that close to the vest because I smell a rat.

Thanks blab..... ;>)

60 posted on 10/18/2006 1:24:54 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (New York Times? Get a rope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson