Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
There you go again, trying to redefine science in order to get religion classified as science.

You have in no way shown intelligent design to be a religious concept or process. Or do you consider your posts to be products of a religious concept?

497 posted on 10/16/2006 12:27:30 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
You have in no way shown intelligent design to be a religious concept or process.

One, it requires a designer, and unless you go in with the Raelians, that means a supernatural designer. Supernatural means outside of the realm of the natural sciences, which is what we're discussing.

Two, the statements of the founders of your movement, explicitly stating that the "designer" is the Christian god, and the movement is meant as a Christian evangelical tool.

BTW, for a god to guide evolution would be pretty easy. For a god to set up such a complicated process billions of years ago knowing it would result in exactly as it is now is pretty awesome. Why do you limit the powers of your god so?

Or do you consider your posts to be products of a religious concept?

I think it would be great if the Theory of Evolution (Natural Selection) were to be disproved in my lifetime and replaced by another theory. It is interesting to be alive during scientific advancements that big. Unlike you, I have no stake in this other than the advancement of science.

499 posted on 10/16/2006 12:43:21 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson