I see you've bought the "Teach the Controversy" program developed by the Discovery Institute (the same people who admit that ID has one main goal of Christian evangelism).
Why it usurps the name "science" for itself is something of a mystery.
There you go again, trying to redefine science in order to get religion classified as science.
You have in no way shown intelligent design to be a religious concept or process. Or do you consider your posts to be products of a religious concept?