[Fester Chugabrew]

. . . he has steadfastly refused to explain why "Intelligent Design" predicts that such an event should never occur.

On the contrary, I have asserted in the past that it is the essential nature of intelligent design to organize matter in such a way that it performs specific functions, much as you make use of intelligent design to respond to my posts. It is not to difficult to predict that where there is intelligent design, organization of matter would take place. There is nothing religious or inherently unscientific about it. OTOH, it would not be happening if intelligent design had the evidence to falsify it, namely all particle matter disintegrating into chaos.

[Dimensio]

On the contrary, I have asserted in the past that it is the essential nature of intelligent design to organize matter in such a way that it performs specific functions,

This does not explain why particle matter should never disintegrate into chaos if your unique version of "intelligent design" is true.

[Stultis]

On the contrary, I have asserted in the past that it is the essential nature of intelligent design to organize matter in such a way that it performs specific functions

But that's an empty statement; a mere extension of your tautology.

It's not a matter of organizing "matter in such a way that it performs specific functions". ANY organization of matter, whatsoever; and ANY regularity in nature, whatsoever, will necessarily result in matter having certain qualities, and not having certain others, which will necessarily result in "matter performing specific functions".

Your claim therefore amounts to nothing but a bald assertion that regularity in nature (any regularity whatsoever) equals "design". You give no argument for this claim at all. You merely assert it.