Posted on 10/12/2006 7:50:51 AM PDT by TonyInOhio
I caught CNN the other evening for the first time in ages. Jack Cafferty had an e-mail segment called, "Advice for the GOP." Every e-mail he read was from a moonbat, saliviating over the Republican loss of Congress. And CNN wonders why they're losing viewers?
Absolutely one of the best I have seen yet.............
:}
Thank you for the two threads. They were even worse than I thought. You know Ken is doing great things for the Republican Party and I bet those KOS guys are just jealous that their democratic weirdo guy (can't think of his name at the moment) is seriously screwing up and might even make them lose seats. If I was Ken (whether he is gay or not) I would sue those idiots for following him around and asking questions that he has already answered (he does not have to answer the question for one, but even the answer he gave should be enough). I am so glad that democrats are self distructive in their elections. As much as they try, they just can't find that story or event that will stick and allow victory!!!! I was to be honest one of those that wanted gridlock with Republicans to be head of Senate and House (ONLY for fiscal reasons), but after the last two weeks, I hope that Republicans get 100 seats in the Senate and 435 seats in the House (lol).
I sure hope he's right. Terry McAwful was way off on his predictions when he was chairman of the DNC. But then, with McAwful, it is hard to tell if he was just deluded or lying through his teeth as usual.
It wasn't clear from Melman's statement if they truly are "oversampling" Dems or if more people are claiming to be Dems, which results in them being sampled more.
You're welcome. There are only two _viable_ political parties. In only one of those two parties do conservatives have any voice at all. Third-party voters or those who sit home are actually casting their votes for DemocRATS. They are short-sighted and in reality, are undercutting whatever progress we have been able to make.
This is a slow motion version of the Kerry Winning exit poll strategy. Tell everyone that the rats are unstoppably winning and the voters will resign to it and stay home or join the bandwagon. But we had the internet to challenge and dissapate that garbage and Bush won easily in FLA, and other places where those polls said he could not win.
Everything like this is someone's plan. We just need plans to overcome their plans.
Good.
I can screwm till my lungs ache that the polls are junk, but the skittish Reps on the Hill won't listen. They'll probably listen to Melhman who has real internals rather then push polls to back up the fact the MSM is pushing propaganda.
Here in OH, it's stunning. I've walked two different precincts in older Kettering, near UD, which should be HEAVILY Dem. Three out of four houses are GOP. I've only seen ONE Strickland sign---dozens of Blackwell signs.
Spoke to my supervisor about the utter absence of any walkers, ground game, etc. She said this is and ongoing, amazing thing that the Dems have ZERO ground game and ZERO walkers!!! Do you get the significance of this? Our research shows that personal contact, even through a lit drop, is the second best way to get a vote (a phone call is the best). We've dropped close to 200,000 pieces of lit in OH for Blackwell in the last three weeks.
The Dems and their pet pollsters (which is almost ALL pollsters) are attempting a full court press to demoralize Republican voters.
This demoraliation campaign worked...almost...back in 2000, when the MSM declared AlGore the "winner" of Florida's electoral votes. Based on what? Exit POLLS.
Between 10,000 and 15,000 Bush voters in the Florida panhandle --who hadn't voted yet-- gave up and went home without voting upon hearing that "news."
Even Democrat pollster Bob Beckel confirmed those numbers in his post-election analysis.
Among other pollster tricks, all having the effect and obvious design of boosting the Rats and attempting to discourage GOPers.
Is that the same Mehlman who said that conservatives favor candidates the support "comprehensive" immigration reform over securing our borders??
This is an ongoing debate in the polling community - should they control for party affiliation? Many (like Gallup) feel that party affiliation is not a fixed thing, and people switch back and forth between calling themselves members of one party or another. That's why you see a lot of insane whipsaws in Gallup. Others, like Rasmussen and Zogby, control for party affiliation.
I'm talking to pollsters and strategists in PA and they are seeing the same thing. So these pollsters like Ras and Mason-Dixon this time around are missing something big. I don't know why, but I'm here to tell you they ain't gettin' it. For most of the polls, whatever they say, I do a 10% adjustment: take the Dem down 5% and move the Republican up 5%. But some polls are so silly that even that adjustment doesn't give you an accurate number.
This will probably be a very low turnout election. Whenever there is a lot of mudslinging (a la Foley), the non-aligned voters get turned off and often don't bother to vote at all.
Look for the Dems to pull some last minute race-baiting to try and help with black turnout.
It will be a low turnout on the part of the Dems, that's for sure.
Dems don't have as much Soros money this year.
Gawd, I hope you're right!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.