Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirLinksalot
Why should they complain? ID is a misrepresentation from start to finish.

It is religion masquerading as pseudo-science in a blatant attempt to force a particular narrow interpretation of scriptures into science

7 posted on 10/11/2006 9:06:09 AM PDT by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman
"an unnecessary ruse to obtain information from us"
Pretty bad logic for a Cornell student. From them no information is obtainable as they do not have anything worth the name of "information". But about them information is obtainable.
8 posted on 10/11/2006 9:14:09 AM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
It is religion masquerading as pseudo-science in a blatant attempt to force a particular narrow interpretation of scriptures into science

According to YOUR definitions that you like to post, Intelligent Design would have to be classified as a theory. It would be nice if you'd play by your own rules.
9 posted on 10/11/2006 9:21:38 AM PDT by dbehsman (NRA Life Member, and loving every minute of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
Why should they complain?

Probably embarrassed at having their stupidity revealed to the public.

15 posted on 10/11/2006 9:29:40 AM PDT by RogueIsland (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
Your reply, and its tone were totally unnecessary. The club representative said they were willing to have open, civil discussions. And yet, you think it is necessary to throw mud.

Shame on you!

21 posted on 10/11/2006 9:48:43 AM PDT by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman
I've only read one article purporting to advocate so-called Intelligent Design. It was not at all anti-Darwinian, anti-natural selection, or any of the stuff that gets creationists and evolutionists at each other's throats.

Consequently I don't understand this antipathy. And it looks like something worse than antipathy, you and Gslob seem to be saying that since Intelligent design seems stupid and dishonest to you it is moral to be dishonest with those who are looking into it.

SO it seems the either you would have to agree that it would be moral for Creationists to be dishonest in their dealings with you, or not. If not, then presumably your being right about Evolution and all that confers a moral status on you higher than that enjoyed by your opponents.

The only other group I've heard about lately that takes that stand (namely: because we are right we are not subject to the same moral laws as others) are the Islamofascists.

Interesting. I didn't realize this controversy was so violent.

33 posted on 10/11/2006 12:48:52 PM PDT by Mad Dawg (Now we are all Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

She's really a closet ID'er and was just going incognito to avoid persecution from militant evo faithful.


36 posted on 10/11/2006 2:28:52 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson