Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: excludethis
Yes, obviously the best way to deter your enemies is to give them exactly what they want...
2 posted on
10/11/2006 8:46:19 AM PDT by
linear
(Taxonomy is a willing and pliant mistress but Reality waits at home, sharpening her knife.)
To: excludethis
Annan is an idiot of course.
To: excludethis
Annan is conducting "diplomatic jihad" against America as he always has......pondering his relevance, I wonder if when he goes home to Ghana he will advocate the use of toilet paper?
To: excludethis
Theres nothing surprising about this. The only way that there will be military action is if NK launches an attack first.
To: excludethis
Maybe we should just ignore 'em. Something to the effect of:
"The gub'mint of North Korea has failed to negotiate in good faith. We are discontinuing any aid to that benighted nation and will have no further contact with them until they, through extraordinary actions, demonstrate sincere, good intentions."
"Until then, let 'em starve and freeze in the dark."
7 posted on
10/11/2006 9:01:04 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(If you want to be a martyr, we want to martyr you.)
To: excludethis
Bolstering defenses is telling the enemy you have no offense.
Bush is frozen, he should be promising sure and swift destruction of North Korea.
Kicking Annan and his gang of goons out of New York.
Withdrawing all diplomats and letting other countries deal with meanfaced angry Air Force and Army Generals.
Im sick of all this crap.
8 posted on
10/11/2006 9:01:26 AM PDT by
claptrap
(optional tag-line under reconsideration)
To: excludethis
I really don't think it would be wise for our President to come out and disclose a all out war or even a threat of it, with NK at a " news conference" . A war of this nature would be well underway before we would have a press conference announcing it!!......I would expect if this is the case, President Bush would come out and just make a statement. " We are dropping bombs as I speak"!!!!
10 posted on
10/11/2006 9:04:51 AM PDT by
pollywog
(Psalm 44:5 "Put your HOPE in God, for I will yet praise Him, my Savior and my God.")
To: excludethis
Maybe Koffi Annan should hold 1 on 1 talks with N. Korea.
ROTFLMAO!
To: excludethis
As Bush spoke, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the United States to hold one-on-one talks with North Korea, something the U.S. has refused to do.What a fool. Why don't we just disband the U.N. if countries are supposed to have one-on-one talks.
15 posted on
10/11/2006 9:12:52 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: excludethis
16 posted on
10/11/2006 9:13:28 AM PDT by
AliVeritas
(Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
To: excludethis
"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the United States to hold one-on-one talks with North Korea"
Kofi needs to show his financing docs or shut the hell up. He needs to have a one-on-one talks with an IRS agent and Assistant Attorney General.
17 posted on
10/11/2006 9:14:39 AM PDT by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: excludethis
And do we really expect the President to telegraph his every move?
To: excludethis
It's not our job Annan! It is all the SC's job to hold NK to honor their previous agreements. STFU Annan!
19 posted on
10/11/2006 9:19:24 AM PDT by
tobyhill
(The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
To: excludethis
The safest approach to anything said by Kofi Annan is that the truth is the opposite of what he says. It may also be corrupt, dishonest, and immoral. And it will always be presented in a fog of nice-sounding words.
Did I miss anything?
Congressman Billybob
Latest article: "An Open Letter to President Bollinger"
Please see my most recent statement on running for Congress, here.
To: excludethis
HEADLINE IS ALL WRONG!!!!!
Read story again: >WASHINGTON - President Bush called Wednesday for stiff sanctions on North Korea for its reported nuclear test and asserted that the United States has "no intentions of attacking" the reclusive regime.
In a Rose Garden news conference, Bush said the United States remains committed to diplomacy, but also "reserves all options to defend our friends in the region."
-end of prior story-
Translation to "Texas Speak"
In "Diplomacy Speak" "no intentions" means we're not going to do it today, and maybe not tomorrow, but we are 1/10 millimeter away from doing something militarily to FU up real bad.
"Reserves all options" = We can do anything we want
"Defend friends in region" = And we can do it just because we feel like it.
This is by no means an easy msg for DPRK.
25 posted on
10/11/2006 9:37:58 AM PDT by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry....)
To: excludethis
Does anyone remember, after his speech right after 9/11, when Bush mentioned "The axis of evil, Iraq,
Iran and North Korea?"...and the left completely soiled their shorts over that comment?
Bush knew it then...of course, the focus has been the WOT in Iraq since then (aside from the multilateral talks with NK) , but now they're raising a stink about Bush "ignoring" NK?
How pathetically typical of the left! If these people weren't so dangerous if they ever regained complete power in this country, it would be laughable to even consider them seriously.
27 posted on
10/11/2006 9:47:19 AM PDT by
kstewskis
("Tolerance is what happens when one loses their principles..." Fr. A. Saenz)
To: excludethis
If we listen to Annan about ANYTHING, we will have to replace those who listen!
31 posted on
10/11/2006 10:11:45 AM PDT by
Edgerunner
(The greatest impediment to world peace is the UN and the Peaceniks)
To: excludethis
I will probably be flamed for this, but why not go ahead and talk with Lil'Kim one on one? Why not have a bourbon and rice and lay out the true picture for Kim? Man to man, mano a mano. It's like this, Kim. You starve your own people and now are destabilizing the region. We have no desire to kick your ass, but rest assured we can and we will if you push this too far. Have another spring roll there Kim, I'll have one too. So you like fast cars and James Bond movies? Well Kim, it's been nice but I gotta go. Don't forget, we have missiles targeted on you at all times. Anything flies over Japan or South Korea, we might just get twitchy. Thanks for the good time.
32 posted on
10/11/2006 10:17:21 AM PDT by
Sender
(Error 404: tagline not found)
To: excludethis
Bush could invite Kim Jong Il to the White House for 1 on 1 talks.
35 posted on
10/11/2006 10:48:36 AM PDT by
ol painless
(ol' painless is out of the bag)
To: excludethis
The modern liberal is able to simulataneously decry Bush for going it alone in Iraq and not going it alone with North Korea.
What liberals really want is situations where the US is at a disadvantage, but they're not honest enough to say that.
36 posted on
10/11/2006 10:50:54 AM PDT by
dirtboy
(Good fences make good neighbors)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson