Posted on 10/06/2006 10:13:41 AM PDT by carman57
With the midterm elections looming before US all American should be mindful & wary in our voting as the very existence/survival of the United States as a free & independent country is at stake since the next Congress will have to decide on the Security & Prosperity Partnership a deviously subversive & wholly unconstitutional scheme courtesy of George Bush to merge US into a North American Union(http://www.spp.gov&www.house.gov/pau...2806.htm)which virtually assures our demise.The treasonous national ID act will also go into effect during that term so choose only those committed to our independence & liberty & who will oppose the above which will only bring the darkness of more despotism & tyranny upon US .Every voter should challenge every candidate over this crucial issue.
George Washington warned US of the danger /folly of political parties.Both parties are to blame & at fault for their pernicious policies which are ruining US(unjust wars,runaway spending,illegal immigration etc.)& amount to national suicide.Bouncing back & forth between the Dems/GOP who are only rearranging deck chairs on our sinking ship of state amounts to political russian roulette & an exercise in futility. America is on the wrong track thanks to the corrupt to the core 2 party system.Until We the Sheeple abandon our absurd attachment to it & throws all the bums out now we dont have a prayer or stand a chance of turning things around.Time for real change in DC.Vote 3rd party or kiss the USA as the founding fathers intended it to be goodbye.What will it be back to bondage/settling for slavery or a rebirth of liberty & sovereignty for US all & our posterity.The choice is yours.Will we remain so gullibly & naively focused on foreign enemies that we dont see the domestic enemies in our midst & deal with them accordingly before its too late folks?Didnt we fight a war once upon a time to rid US of foreign control which we are now yielding to once again? TAKE BACK AMERICA NOW OR NEVER.ITS JUST THAT SIMPLE.
ALSO CHECK OUT THE NEW AMERICAN SPECIAL ISSUE ON SPP.
Mexico's president's own National Action Party (http://www.pan.org.mx) is now working with its governors in Northern states near the U.S. border to pressure George Bush to veto the border wall. Details (in Spanish) are here:
http://www.el-universal.com.mx/notas/379772.html
These same people hypocritically haven't lifted a finger to make Mexico's own immigration laws less anti-gringo and racist against us down there:
http://www.directory.com.mx/immigration
What do they seek, a conquista of U.S. territory that Mexico claims because a few of its inhabitants relatively briefly occupied the land after they stole it from Spain (which stole it from indigenous tribes)?
Say, didn't you leave a "t" out of your name?
Shouldn't it be Cartman?
Oh no, trilateral minions of subversion, despotism & tyranny
have killed Kenny!!!!
Aw, the Left has been
staying up late working out
details for their rants--
AN AMERICAN COUP D'ETAT
Speak for yourself c57. Not for me.
Uh, Ross. Dear Ross. Thanks for the Clinton Administration.
Bill Clinton, Pampered Prima Donna
by L. Brent Bozell III
September 26, 2006 Tell a friend about this site
Pundits are pondering Bill Clinton’s feverish attack on “Fox News Sunday,” laying into Chris Wallace for alleged oh-so-clever smirking and pounding the host’s leg with his pointy finger for emphasis.
No one asked if Clinton’s outburst hurt the publicity for his “Clinton Global Initiative.” (It didn’t help.) The first question was: staged outrage, or a spontaneous reaction? It’s quite a commentary on the Slick One that millions on both sides of the political fence would guess he plotted this tantrum in advance. Count me in on that number. I believe it was staged, a plan to please left-wingers who loathe Fox News with a passion and want them demonized as the communications center of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
Clinton’s hot-tempered answer simply does not match the question from Chris Wallace. The central question was tough, but restrained, based on a book written by Lawrence Wright, a writer for The New Yorker, not a conservative magazine, to put it mildly. It was not unlike the typical question Tim Russert would ask his guest. But Wallace may have tripped a trigger by mentioning Clinton’s 1993 debacle in Somalia, primarily because it’s something every other interviewer skips. The roughest part came when Wallace quoted Osama bin Laden from that Wright book. In the wake of the Somalia debacle, bin Laden reportedly stated "I have seen the frailty and the weakness and the cowardice of U.S. troops."
What came flying out of Clinton’s mouth sounded like vintage Hillary. Fox is asking me this because “ABC just had a right-wing conservative” show on 9/11! “President Bush’s neo-cons” thought I was too obsessed with bin Laden, and they did nothing before 9/11! At least I tried to get Osama, unlike “the right-wingers who are attacking me now!”
But Clinton sounded stranger when he attacked Wallace personally: “So you did Fox’s bidding on this show. You did your nice little conservative hit job on me.” And then it grew even more bizarre: “You set this meeting up because you were going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers because Rupert Murdoch’s supporting my work on climate change.” If Murdoch has grown more supportive of the Clintons, then why would he conspire to ruin Clinton’s Fox appearance?
Wallace was certainly surprised – stunned would better describe it – by Clinton’s intensity. When asked to explain it later, Wallace said he read the transcripts of Clinton’s other media appearances, including CNN’s “Larry King Live,” NBC’s “Meet the Press,” and FNC’s own “On the Record with Greta Van Susteren.” He was “astonished” that none of these bothered to raise the question of Clinton’s presidential performance on terrorism, even in the wake of all the furor Team Clinton raised trying to kill off ABC’s docudrama “Path to 9/11.” That list doesn’t include Clinton shoe-shiners like Jon Stewart of “The Daily Show” or MSNBC’s resident Chihuahua, Keith Olbermann.
You can’t really be astonished by Larry King, whose usual tough question would be along the lines of “Jif or Skippy, Mr. President?” I exaggerate, but not by much. Here’s an actual Larry King question to Clinton from last week: “Now, the purpose of your initiative overall is to make the world a better place, right?...Is it a better place?” You can’t be that astonished by Greta van Susteren, who’s the designated puffball interviewer of both Clintons for FNC. (And that’s another nail in the coffin of that alleged Murdoch conspiracy.)
The real disappointment on this list is Russert, the man who built a reputation for grilling politicians with long text boxes of challenging information. But for Clinton, Russert delivered a Larry King performance. His actual first questions: “The second year of the Clinton Global Initiative. What did you achieve this year?...Do people keep their commitments?” Then he went on to other toughies. Is Dick Cheney wrong on Iraq? And when Hillary runs, are you ready for the nasty attacks on her?
The second annual meeting of the Clinton Global Initiative was more proof that Clinton walks around with the major media in his jacket pocket. Look no further than the long list of so-called “featured attendees” who associated themselves with the event. Many of them were moderators of panel discussions – not only predictable names like George Stephanopoulos, but Tom Brokaw, Judy Woodruff, Newsweek international editor Fareed Zakaria, CNN anchors Zain Verjee and Sanjay Gupta, and NPR anchor Michele Norris. Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer, and Christiane Amanpour were also on the list of supportive media attendees.
It’s easy to see from this display that Clinton is a pampered peacock, a prima donna who expects the media elite to love him, and explodes like a spoiled child when anyone dares challenge him. He only expects a challenge from the radical right-wingers at Fox. That’s what he calls anyone who would ruffle a fine feather of his glorious legacy-building project.
Right. No doubt the Moonbats will come to our rescue. Thank God the Moonbats are always there to proactively stem the flow of illegals and never do anything to encourage them to stay. Thanks even more to the Moonbats for being so bullish on national defense. ;)
Clinton's glorious legacy-building project is, to anyone with any common sense, a dismal failure. I believe that Clinton is and has been reaping the experience of having what has been done in the dark being shouted from the housetops. . to his surprise.
Yes, Twinkie; that's how WE see it!
Unfortunately about 40% on the other side sees it totally different....."Christians",hello???
They honestly think that B.J. clintooon can walk on water too!!!
Sad but true. I heard some female politico from Missouri (a Democrat being funded by Clinton sponsored $$) sit there and say Clinton was such a great President, but she wouldn't trust him around her daughter. Someone who thinks as cynically and illogically as all that needs to not be elected to the position of dog catcher. - The trouble is that there are too many politicians who do not give a flying flip about this country; they are power and money hungry and find it easy to manipulate the minds of voters who are too lazy to do much thinking. Sort of the morally blind leading the lazily blind. - The scary thing to me is that in this election, so much is at stake. This country has already been so weakened by 8 yrs. of the originally 24 yrs. to perpetual (planned but thwarted) Clinton Dynasty that I wonder whether it can survive the resulting liberal Democrat residue of their rancid influence if they do get complete control.
I have elderly in-laws that I love dearly, but they are what they calls democrats with blind-folders on!!
When I met my wonderful wife 24 years ago she had the same ideas. After she was sneak-listening in when I tuned in to Rush Limbaugh, she finally saw the "light" after voting for clinton the first time around. Our question to our friends is:"How can you be a real Christian and be a democrat at the same time? How do you reconcile these two??"
I think, however, this Foley garbage will turn out GOP voters in droves!!!
There are so many "yellow dog Democrats" left over from the Roosevelt era, parents who passed it on to their kids. Those Roosevelt coat tails are about worn out, and this modern crop of Democrats are full blown, full grown Socialists. - My parents had the old ideas about the Democrat Party being "more for the little man", but they weren't ones who disdained hard work and just couldn't see where the Democrat Party was taking this country. The only time Daddy strayed from the DP was when Ronald Reagan ran for President. He liked Reagan, but then when Clinton ran, he liked Clinton. Daddy was hard of hearing, his reading skills were limited as were my mother's, and they trusted the media of "David & Chet", they were from the Depression / Roosevelt era, and were just indoctrinated into the Democrat propaganda. It's a wonder that I escaped; but I learned fairly quickly after I voted the first time ever - for Jimmuh Carter - and paid pretty close attention to the malaise that followed, a malaise that was his and his party's that he tried to pawn off on us as our fault in his famous fireside sweater talks. Reagan told me I wasn't a worthless malaise filled wastrel, and I appreciated it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
