Posted on 10/05/2006 11:50:13 AM PDT by kcvl
Edited on 10/05/2006 1:00:50 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
>XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX THU OCT 5 2006 2:53:48 ET XXXXX
CLAIM: FILTHY FOLEY ONLINE MESSAGES WERE PAGE PRANK GONE AWRY
**World Exclusive**
**Must Credit the DRUDGE REPORT**
According to two people close to former congressional page Jordan Edmund, the now famous lurid AOL Instant Message exchanges that led to the resignation of Mark Foley were part of an online prank that by mistake got into the hands of enemy political operatives, the DRUDGE REPORT can reveal.
According to one Oklahoma source who knows the former page very well, Edmund, a conservative Republican, goaded an unwitting Foley to type embarrassing comments that were then shared with a small group of young Hill politicos. The prank went awry when the saved IM sessions got into the hands of political operatives favorable to Democrats.
The primary source, an ally of Edmund, adamantly proclaims that the former page is not a homosexual. The prank scenario was confirmed by a second associate of Edmund. Both are fearful that their political careers will be affected if they are publicly brought into the matter.
The prank scenario only applies to the Edmund IM sessions and does not necessarily apply to any other exchanges between the former congressman and others.
The news come on the heels that Edmund has hired former Timothy McVeigh attorney, Stephen Jones.
Developing...
The following FACTS need to be accepted by all people who wish to discuss this story:
1. Foley was wrong and should have resigned. In fact, he was dishonest and should have retired 2 years ago, at least.
2. Communications were with EX-pages who had gone back to their home towns.
3. Hastert only knew about the innocuous e-mails, and not the lewd IM's.
4. e-mails and IM's are DIFFERENT.
5. There is no law against being a homosexual. It is sinful but not illegal.
6. The ex-page who received the e-mail is a different person from the person who received the lewd IM's.
6. As of now, with the exception of Tyson Vivyan who has no proof, all communications were with young men who were over 16, and the lewd stuff was with someone over 18. They are NOT little kids, and although repellant, Foley is not a pedophile, which definition includes an attraction to PRE-adolescent boys.
People who misstate these FACTS are either too obtuse to discuss this issue or are deliberately trying to stir up dissension.
Thank you!
I'm sorry. Bad inference I guess from your post, where you asked if we could trust loraditch because he ran a gay porn site.
I realise that you meant a person who runs a gay PORN SITE might not be trustworthy, not that he was gay and therefore untrustworthy.
Sorry about that.
Vivyan said he was nominated as a page by Rep. John. J. Duncan, R-Tenn. Don Walker, Duncan's deputy chief of staff, confirmed Thursday to the AP that Vivyan was a page from
Duncan's district.
"We did not get any complaints form him while he was a page or after he was a page or anytime thereafter until Monday," Walker said. "As soon as we learned of it we turned it over to the authorities."
I refuse to dignify their poor coverage with my presence.
Thanks for the information on CBS..I tuned into the stations that carry Rush,Hannity and Levin.(Fox and ABC radio).. I watch local news at times on TV and a few shows..I have been busy getting my house and yard in shape after a long absence and it does keep me hopping!
I quit the newspaper long ago when my frequent long trips out of town had me always having to call and cancel delivery and I found the internet was better! Free Republic is invaluable..I lurk a lot on news/political threads.I don't have time to read the blogs I used to read!
I agree Shep is a such drama queen. I miss Brit, my newer faster computer I bought and have at my daughter's, though!
There I have cable..I am on dial up here!
Back to the subject..I deplore Foley's disgusting IMs. He was easily "lured".I do not blame Hastert for not catching on to a serious problem with the information he says he had in the original Emails..I am distressed over the possible damage that has been done and I am very angry with Foley and anyone who knew this and held out until it would cloud the upcoming election.I stay angry at the dems.
That the dem operatives would reveal this after it was not possible to have Foley's name removed from the ballot is business as usual.
May God protect us, our Armed Forces and this Nation from a Dem led House or Senate!
For instance, we don't know if the Congressman confirmed over the phone that someone named Robert Tyson Vivian served as a page, and then the press reports it as Tyson Vivyan.
Hillary's people did this several times, in order to hide donations from certain groups. They would type in a name on a list with a false typo and it would keep unsavory associations from being noticed.
Does he want to lose his entire audience??
Sometimes I just don't get it.
"OH MY GOD...let this be true!"
Could be for the original Page, but others have come forward and it doesn't seem likely.
"Three new pages step forward"
http://michellemalkin.com/archives/006058.htm
Those 3 "new" pages have absolutely no way of knowing what was in those IMs or who did them.
Somebody in the GOP leadership needs to tell us why...if FOLEY's homosexuality was an open secret...WHY he as the Chairman of that committee.
Even to a character in JACKASS 2...that seems like a pretty stupid thing to ignore.
Whoops! I had heard that he did. Hmmm.... Guess that makes sense.
Just 77 posts to 3000!
That's the point. It's so incredibly convoluted that no one knows what's happening. This might be deliberate, as the Dems realized it was spinning toward them, or it could be like we had with Clinton/Lewinsky, just in a "lull" between big, important data dumps.
How about "homosexuals?" Pervert is a perfectly good word, but it seems to have lost it's impact. I don't even like "pedophile" for those who prey on small children that much because the word actually means "likes children' and it is too much like 'audiophile' or 'francophile'. Pederast is much better. I don't have an answer. A-hole is pretty good.
I was wondering that too, was there AOL instant messaging back in 1997? and did Foley have the same account and sn back then?
my bad, you guys already answered my question.
Now I see that it read that ABC is saying only......
Hindsight is always 20-20.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.