1 posted on
10/04/2006 5:12:17 PM PDT by
jrooney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: jrooney
So, just one year younger than Bill's d!ck sucker, eh!~??!~~
To: jrooney
My word! Democrats on a homophobic witch hunt while invading the privacy of consenting homosexuals? Warp speed Scotty!
42 posted on
10/04/2006 5:20:32 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: jrooney
Take note: there's likely more than 1 page involved. This guy was like a kid in a candy store...
44 posted on
10/04/2006 5:20:41 PM PDT by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: jrooney
Holy Dan Rathergate, deja vu all over again Brian Ross. Courage ABC.
49 posted on
10/04/2006 5:21:21 PM PDT by
Shqipo
(2006 is Bush Country!)
To: jrooney
To: jrooney
Well, this pretty much blows up the Democrats who used the "Monica was of age" defense for Clinton.
Of course, there may be more emails or IMs with underage pages, so who knows at this point.
57 posted on
10/04/2006 5:22:24 PM PDT by
Azzurri
To: jrooney
Well, I just can hardly believe that they got their facts wrong.
62 posted on
10/04/2006 5:23:09 PM PDT by
teenyelliott
(Soylent green should be made outta liberals...)
To: jrooney
I thought they said he was 16. Maybe it was the benign emails that went to the 16 year old.
To: jrooney
IF true, this will not be the big story that it was when he was supposed to be 16.
To: jrooney
The Dems concocted this whole scheme. They should all resign and give up the Congress to Republicans!!!
71 posted on
10/04/2006 5:24:15 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
To: jrooney
The issue here is the fact that ABC, the MSM and the dems lied and called this person "under age." The MSM gets busted again courtesy of the internet.
72 posted on
10/04/2006 5:24:37 PM PDT by
moose2004
(You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
To: jrooney
The dems were already hypocrits on this issue. Now it will be even worse.
They will still whine that Hastert didn't "do enough", or that there are other victims, or that there was still a coverup, etc.
78 posted on
10/04/2006 5:25:34 PM PDT by
pulaskibush
(USA, founded by tolerant Christians. USSR, founded by intolerant Secularist.)
To: jrooney
So does this mean this whole thing was not about "protecting the children" but was just about outing a gay Republican? If so, the dems are self-destructing - gays are their biggest fans.
79 posted on
10/04/2006 5:26:11 PM PDT by
hsalaw
To: jrooney
...yeah a year younger than .....MMMMMMMonica
Doogle
82 posted on
10/04/2006 5:26:29 PM PDT by
Doogle
(USAF 69-73...."never store a threat you should have eliminated")
To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
Media Shenanigans PING
FAKE BUT ACCURATE reporting.
90 posted on
10/04/2006 5:27:36 PM PDT by
weegee
(Remember "Remember the Maine"? Well in the current war "Remember the Baby Milk Factory")
To: jrooney
as i like to say, "Well, well, well."
91 posted on
10/04/2006 5:27:38 PM PDT by
InvisibleChurch
(What I do (sin) is proof of what I am (sinful).)
To: jrooney
Well then, by all means, let's get Foley back in the race! I mean he waited until the kid was 18, so no problem.
To: jrooney
On a similar note, the University of Arkansas at Little Rock will be having a "gay pride week" starting October 11th. I have been invited to join the facebook group A Protest against "Gay Pride Week" at UALR.
http://ualr.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2210984635
We will be making several protest plans very soon.
109 posted on
10/04/2006 5:29:53 PM PDT by
pulaskibush
(USA, founded by tolerant Christians. USSR, founded by intolerant Secularist.)
To: jrooney
"Oh crap!"
To: jrooney
129 posted on
10/04/2006 5:33:45 PM PDT by
gaijin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson