Skip to comments.
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^
| 10-04-06
| Drudge
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200601; 20061107; 4thestate5thcolumn; abcdisney; aravosis; barbaramikulski; biasmeanslayoffs; billburton; boycottdisney; brianrosssucks; burton; byebyedems; cuespookymusic; disneynews; distortion; drivebymedia; election; enemedia; fakebutaccurate; foley; foleygate; hitandrunjournalism; homosexualactivist; homosexualagenda; johnaravosis; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikerogers; mikulski; mslm; msm; phoneylibscandal298; powerghraib; rogers; smearcampaign; targetlist; thailand; trysellingthetruth; waltsrotatingcorpse; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: TXBubba
Who in the HilaryCare War Room manufactured this scandal so sloppily? Someone is going to be looking for a new sleazy job.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
341
posted on
10/04/2006 6:10:44 PM PDT
by
bray
(Voting for the Rats is a Deathwish)
To: frankjr
"Would you like to go out to two decimal places?"
Well, you're proven you're a freeper..a DU'er would have said:
"Would you like two go out to too decimal places?"
:)
To: bnelson44; RegulatorCountry
Where do you get that the IMs occured in the Fall and during an election? Do you mean because Foley referenced needing to go vote? That refers to his needing to go vote on the floor of the House, as in voting for legislation. Maybe you are referring to something I don't know about. In any event, no one is dating these IMs as going back to 2002 which was the last election prior to 2003.
343
posted on
10/04/2006 6:12:09 PM PDT
by
MikeA
(Not voting out of anger in November is a vote for Nancy Pelosi as Speaker of the House)
To: bnelson44
What are you talking about?You have used more question marks in replying to one post than I normally use in a month.
Usually, the answer to most questions can be found by follwing the thread to later replies.
Saves on our supply of endagered question marks.
344
posted on
10/04/2006 6:12:14 PM PDT
by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: Connservative
The same guy. He is in the top 10 in the market. Been on the air for over two years.
To: rwfromkansas
As for Jordan being a dirty tricks operative, you do have to wonder why a young man who engaged in these types of IM's went to work as Deputy Campaign Manager for a Rep. who is big on school prayer amendments, etc.
Or is it Istook that we have to ask about?
346
posted on
10/04/2006 6:12:19 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: plain talk
yes, but allow us a little fun of gloating for awhile, OK? Maybe one or two hours' worth. Howz that sound?? :-)
347
posted on
10/04/2006 6:12:19 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(..is an American allright, but is not in Japan, folks. Thanks for letting me keep the moniker.)
To: Jedidah
Yep, she was a ripe old 19!
LLS
348
posted on
10/04/2006 6:12:21 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Significant Numbers for $200, Alex.
349
posted on
10/04/2006 6:12:30 PM PDT
by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
To: Pukin Dog
Good post the other day Pukin
We're probably going to see some Pukin Donkeys soon.
350
posted on
10/04/2006 6:13:09 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: GeorgiaDawg32
351
posted on
10/04/2006 6:13:12 PM PDT
by
misterrob
(Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
To: bray
Unfortunately, I don't think we have to wait too long for the next scandal to hit. :( Hopefully that one will be just as poor as this one.
352
posted on
10/04/2006 6:13:15 PM PDT
by
NinoFan
To: Phsstpok
Internet age of consent is 18, not 16.
That person is now 21 years old and the posts were from 2003, QED, he was 18 Not sure where you are getting that. He specifies in the IMs, "Xxxxxxxxxx (8:33:29 PM): ya slow things down a little im still young...like under 18 dont want to do anything illegal...im not 18 till feb 23 Maf54 (8:33:43 PM): i know.. Maf54 (8:33:50 PM): nothing will happen
353
posted on
10/04/2006 6:13:30 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: GeorgiaDawg32
Has anybody on the news exposed Drudge's story? Fox? TIA
Comment #355 Removed by Moderator
To: jrooney
ABC Statement on revelation IM teen was not a minor:
"We are investigating these vicious attacks on Republican Representative Foley's legacy as a paedophile (did we mention he is a Republican?)."
356
posted on
10/04/2006 6:13:53 PM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: conservativepoet
H&C are dropping the ball on this!
I guess FNC is trying to verify the story on Drudge's site.
357
posted on
10/04/2006 6:14:20 PM PDT
by
TheRobb7
(How many Democrats will YOU elect by staying home on Election Day????)
To: ground_fog
I keep flipping between LOST and H&C... nothing yet.
358
posted on
10/04/2006 6:14:23 PM PDT
by
RedCell
("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
To: Enchante
Good point! The Demagogues who have been all hot and bothered (hypocritically) about this should now have to explain to THEIR constituents why THEY find sex chatter between two adult homosexuals so disgusting.....Yes, they will. But I don't forget how hot and heavy the Dems were via Clinton/Monica to give HUGE MSM COVERAGE to the words "oral sex". And now we have bits and pieces of an "oral sex" epidemic happenening in junior high schools.
I'm seeing a parallel to then, and these "released" IMs by the press. It's "porn" on line masquerading as news.
Lots of kids are reading the news -- I should think certain LAWS in place should be enacted and INVOKED by Republicans.
VERY SOON!
359
posted on
10/04/2006 6:14:31 PM PDT
by
Alia
To: ground_fog
Sean just mentioned that on H & C.
360
posted on
10/04/2006 6:14:47 PM PDT
by
tiredoflaundry
( The kinder we are to terrorists, the harsher we are to their potential victims.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson