Skip to comments.
New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote
ABC News ^
Posted on 10/03/2006 11:02:07 AM PDT by slowhand520
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 541-552 next last
To: GraniteStateConservative
441
posted on
10/03/2006 1:34:14 PM PDT
by
windchime
(I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
To: pitinkie
It isn't on the page. It's a feature of MySpace Search. If you know someone's email, you can search for their profile.
442
posted on
10/03/2006 1:34:38 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
To: JohnnyZ
I wasn't gonna be 'friends' with one of Foley's boyfriends! You're awesome.
443
posted on
10/03/2006 1:34:53 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: slowhand520
Who knew that Joycelyn Elders was prescient?
444
posted on
10/03/2006 1:35:21 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: JohnnyZ
k..I have facebook not myspace.
445
posted on
10/03/2006 1:35:41 PM PDT
by
pitinkie
(revenge will be sweet)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Oh please, you know Tom's still your #1 friend!
446
posted on
10/03/2006 1:35:52 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
To: GraniteStateConservative
It was sarcasm.Sure it was.
447
posted on
10/03/2006 1:37:21 PM PDT
by
1035rep
To: JohnnyZ
you stay the hell away from Tom!!! He's mine....MINE I tell ya!
To: JohnnyZ
OK. On what basis was he to investigate? Who was to do the investigation? Was he to only investigate Foley, or all known gays, both male and female, in the House?
It isn't against the law to be gay. I can't help it, that's the rule. You cannot investigate everyone about whom you have suspicions. And how are you going to explain "sex police" in the House budget?
You are reacting out of emotion (hint, not a good thing) and not with any type of reason.
449
posted on
10/03/2006 1:38:47 PM PDT
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
To: pitinkie
"They all go into "rehab" to avoid the fallout!"
I know. The coward's way out.
450
posted on
10/03/2006 1:40:31 PM PDT
by
windchime
(I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
To: Miss Marple
On what basis was he to investigate? Who was to do the investigation? Was he to only investigate Foley, or all known gays, both male and female, in the House? I don't know if you've been reading the news lately, but if you happen to check the "internets" for information you may find that there was an incident with Congressman Mark Foley sending creepy emails to a 16-year-old former House page.
451
posted on
10/03/2006 1:40:55 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
To: slowhand520; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; ...
452
posted on
10/03/2006 1:42:52 PM PDT
by
Coleus
(Only half the patients who go into an abortion clinic come out alive.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Nor was I "blaming" the "boy". He was a page. They usually don't hire dummies for that job. Even though this is a relatively young age, the "boy" DID know what was being suggested to him by Foley (a well-known homosexual), and the page DID continue IM'ing him and engaged in blatantly sexual talk, discussing having dinner with him and then, "who knows what next?". The "boy" could have cut off the communications at any time, but chose not to do so for any number of reasons.
Why assume he was just some kid who didn't know ANY better than to have these "conversations" with this much older man? And, maybe he ISN'T sexually confused at all. Maybe this was all a game to him, maybe not. Maybe, maybe, maybe. We have yet to see. As far as the "boy's" part is concerned, at this point in time, it's pretty much all conjecture as to what his part was in this. We may never know. Now that Foley is out, it's all about destroying the Republican Party anyway. This is all smoke & mirrors now and how much traction the Democrats can gain with it. Sad, but true.
Peace.
453
posted on
10/03/2006 1:45:26 PM PDT
by
Max7
To: JohnnyZ
You know, you are simply misfiring on all cylinders. Foley's e-mails were already looked at by the FBI, who found nothing in them to warrant investigation. It was the IM's, which only surfaced on Friday, which were salacious.
I see no reason to fault Hastert for not having ESP.
454
posted on
10/03/2006 1:46:22 PM PDT
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
To: spatso
Ah, but the IM recipient (as opposed to the email recipient) is responsible for what he does now. He's overage.
To: cinives
Do we know for sure who initiated every one of these IMs?
To: Xenalyte
I have messages on backup disks from 1993, maybe even older.
457
posted on
10/03/2006 1:53:36 PM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Be careful what you ask for, and even more careful what you demand. Þ)
To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
I don't know that we do. It could be that Foley resigned based on a guilty conscience without really knowing what was in the IM's. As has been pointed out, one could fake an IM exchange and there would be no way to prove it.
Foley needed to go, but I want to know who was involved in this. If the IM's happend 3 years ago, the former page must be over 18, and therefore can be questioned. I want this done ASAP, and I want to know what the page's political affiliation is, and who his parents are. I am not letting the so-called victim off the hook, since some of those IM's indicated his willing participation.
458
posted on
10/03/2006 1:59:29 PM PDT
by
Miss Marple
(Lord, please look over Mozart Lover's and Jemian's sons and keep them strong.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Does anyone know if you have internet access while at Rehab? I would like to know if someone else has access to Foley's computer...
459
posted on
10/03/2006 2:00:40 PM PDT
by
Fawn
(http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
To: 1035rep; JohnnyZ
Yeah, it was. Johnny is not an out-of-touch old fart. Just accept that you stepped in it.
460
posted on
10/03/2006 2:01:30 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440, 441-460, 461-480 ... 541-552 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson