Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote
ABC News ^

Posted on 10/03/2006 11:02:07 AM PDT by slowhand520

New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote October 03, 2006 1:22 PM

Brian Ross and Maddy Sauer Report:

Former Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) interrupted a vote on the floor of the House in 2003 to engage in Internet sex with a high school student who had served as a congressional page, according to new Internet instant messages provided to ABC News by former pages.

ABC News now has obtained 52 separate instant message exchanges, which former pages say were sent by Foley, using the screen name Maf54, to two different boys under the age of 18.

This message was dated April 2003, at approximately 7 p.m., according to the message time stamp.

THE BLOTTER RECOMMENDS READER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Foley's Exchange with Underage Page Internet Messages Show Foley Sought to Rendezvous with Page Click Here for More of the Brian Ross Home Page Maf54: I miss you Teen: ya me too Maf54: we are still voting Maf54: you miss me too

The exchange continues in which Foley and the teen both appear to describe having sexual orgasms.

Maf54: ok..i better go vote..did you know you would have this effect on me Teen: lol I guessed Teen: ya go vote…I don't want to keep you from doing our job Maf54: can I have a good kiss goodnight Teen: :-* Teen:

The House voted that evening on HR 1559, Emergency War Time supplemental appropriations.

According to another message, Foley also invites the teen and a friend to come to his house near Capitol Hill so they can drink alcohol.

Teen: are you going to be in town over the veterans day weekend Maf54: I may be now that your coming Maf54: who you coming to visit Teen: haha good stuff Teen: umm no one really

Maf54: we will be adjourned ny then Teen: oh good Maf54: by Maf54: then we can have a few drinks Maf54: lol Teen: yes yes ;-) Maf54: your not old enough to drink Teen: shhh… Maf54: ok Teen: that's not what my ID says Teen: lol Maf54: ok Teen: I probably shouldn't be telling you that huh Maf54: we may need to drink at my house so we don't get busted

Read an exclusive excerpt of the actual instant message exchange.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: foley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-552 next last
To: Fawn

AIM on most computers starts up and logs in every time the computer boots up.


281 posted on 10/03/2006 12:09:19 PM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
I want to know what questions were asked. My guess is that none were-- to anyone.

What do you mean? They asked Foley, he said it was innocent. End of story, right?

282 posted on 10/03/2006 12:09:37 PM PDT by JohnnyZ ("I respect and will protect a woman's right to choose" -- Mitt Romney, April 2002)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

Thank you. Please see my post #277.


283 posted on 10/03/2006 12:10:02 PM PDT by Max7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

"Well, I got the R right anyways. Reynolds is taking a big hit up here in NY. He's the best around. He'll get MORE votes because of this."

You did get the R right! I think Reynolds was probably one of their 'ripple effect' targets. I hope you're right about his getting MORE votes as a result of this.


284 posted on 10/03/2006 12:10:07 PM PDT by windchime (I consider the left one of the fronts on the WOT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
Drip...drip...drip

I read the headline and those three words came to my mind immediately. With 52 emails/IM's this can go on easily until the election, which is what this is all about anyway.

I suspect this FRIDAY afternoon, Ross will provide the BIGGEST YET...SHOCKER IM, just in time to keep the weekend talk shows on this NON story.

The PERP has RESIGNED folks!!!

285 posted on 10/03/2006 12:10:13 PM PDT by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

HE IS GONE!!! End of story.


286 posted on 10/03/2006 12:10:26 PM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

do we know for sure it was an AOL account, and not some other IM provider?


287 posted on 10/03/2006 12:10:53 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ

But if the radical Gay agenda and the cultural terorists are exposed than the whole thing BLOWS up in Nancy Pelosi's face!?

Who are the Democrats involved and what re their motives???

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/if-gay-activists-democrats-knew-of.html


288 posted on 10/03/2006 12:11:22 PM PDT by Richbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
ABC is paying reparations to Clintons for Path to 911.

Definitely trying to get the war on terror off the front page anyways.

289 posted on 10/03/2006 12:11:39 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: EternalPatriot
You sound exactly like the prosecutors who have kept Gerald Amerault in prison for 16 years convicted of a crime that he not only didn't commit, but never really even happened.
290 posted on 10/03/2006 12:11:49 PM PDT by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

IMs are easily forged, it doesn't take a computer genius to manufacture them. That said, Foley's resignation lends credibility to the charges.

I do not defend Foley, he deserves everything he gets and more. But the orchestrated politics behind this sordid affair is just as egregious. Gateway Pundit is doing a great job digging into this angle.

If Gay Activists & Democrats Knew of Foley, Why Were They Silent?
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/if-gay-activists-democrats-knew-of.html

[snip] "Radical gay activists made it their mission to out closeted members of the gay community - Today, it's their turn to be outed.

Radical Gay Rights Activists held on to information about Representative Foley for months and years. These "Rights Activists" knew that representative Foley had relationships with "young men less than half his age." They did their own investigation on Foley. They even flew in their sources in to be interviewed about the Representative. They shared this information with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. They held on to the information for over a year. They wrote about how they would break the story at midterm elections."[snip]

You will also find that Soros funded CREW is also part of this.

Foley setup? - Part I
http://www.macsmind.com/wordpress/2006/10/02/foley-setup-part-i/

Foleygate: What Stunk Like a Rat, Was a Democ-Rat!
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/foleygate-what-stunk-like-rat-was.html


The hypocrisy of democrats asking when republicans knew should be turned on them. If the left wing St. Petersburg Times had the e-mails, you know democrats knew of the e-mails as well, and said nothing. Obviously neither party was alarmed by the e-mails, so both can share in the blame for inaction. So the issue really boils down to these 'IMs', who knew about them and when ? It appears left wing bloggers did, and, thus, some democrats surely knew and kept them hidden from republicans so they could spring their 'October Surprise'.

All this does not excuse Foley's actions or betrayal, but the gutter politics surrounding this are just as disgusting and hypocritical. Especially in light of Gerry Studds (D) (sex with a 17 year old male page - re-elected 6 times after), Dan Crane (R) (sex with a 17 year old female page - defeated in re-election bid) and Mel Reynolds (D) (sex with a 16 year old female campaign aide and corruption charges, convicted and pardoned by Clinton) debacles in the past. I didn't include Monica/Willy, she was 22 at the time.


291 posted on 10/03/2006 12:12:06 PM PDT by KMAJ2 (Freedom not defended is freedom relinquished, liberty not fought for is liberty lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: cricket
So, if the Dems get those, can the Pubs & the FBI get all the emails and IM's from Williams Jefferson's - Democratic, Louisiana, office?
292 posted on 10/03/2006 12:13:44 PM PDT by RSmithOpt (Liberalism: Highway to Hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative

Actually it's an option.....I don't have mine set up that way. Anyway, you are also validating that he may not have been the author of the IM's.


293 posted on 10/03/2006 12:14:02 PM PDT by Fawn (http://www.jokaroo.com/funnyvideos/toilet_obsession.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: HelloooClareece

one of the new laws DOJ is trying to pass, is to require ISPs to retain chat logs. if they were already archiving them, why would this be necessary?

these logs are not coming from AOL - they would only release those (if they have them) under court order. So they must be coming from logs on the kid's PC.


294 posted on 10/03/2006 12:14:32 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Dan Tucker

Foley voted with the Donkeys on abortion and gay issues.

He was not, and never claimed to be, a "family values" candidate.

The Republicans have a "big tent" policy that permits people of diverse opinions on these matters to enjoy the support of the party in contests against the Donkeys.

You need look no further than Connecticut to see that the Donkeys have no such "big tent" policy, but are rather dominated by doctrinaire ideologues who purify the party by eating their own. True Stalinists are they.

.


295 posted on 10/03/2006 12:14:43 PM PDT by Westbrook (Having more children does not divide your love, it multiplies it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

"Even though Foley had a 65 ACU rating."

Do you not start to wonder that the world may have been turned upside down? I just listened to the final caller
on Rush. She asked if the IM's suggest that the teen was not necessarily sexually innocent. Rush responded by saying you can't say that because the liberals would attack it insisting he was just a kid and Foley was a 52 year old sophisticated gay man with the power of a Congressman. I think Rush is totally out to lunch on this entire matter. He just keeps saying one dumb thing after another on the entire Foley matter.

What he should have said is conservatives will not accept the idea that the kid is responsible. It is Foley who is a sophisticated gay man, a predatory troll. For most conservatives this is not a political issue, it is a moral and ethical issue.


296 posted on 10/03/2006 12:14:48 PM PDT by spatso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

that was the FBI logging into his account


297 posted on 10/03/2006 12:14:52 PM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Richbee

If Gay Activists & Democrats Knew of Foley, Why Were They Silent?

Radical gay activists made it their mission to out closeted members of the gay community - Today, it's their turn to be outed.

* Radical Gay Rights Activists held on to information about Representative Foley for months and years.

These "Rights Activists" knew that representative Foley had relationships with "young men less than half his age." They did their own investigation on Foley. They even flew in their sources in to be interviewed about the Representative. They shared this information with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. They held on to the information for over a year. They wrote about how they would break the story at midterm elections.

http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2006/10/if-gay-activists-democrats-knew-of.html

Rumor has it that attacks have been planned on a Republican Senator?

Rick Santorum has a Gay aid and will the Rad' Dems attempt a smear attack???


298 posted on 10/03/2006 12:14:52 PM PDT by Richbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

Isn't this one of those posts where sarcasm off/ is not needed because you really meant it?? That is scary.


299 posted on 10/03/2006 12:15:10 PM PDT by bwteim (bwteim = Begin With The End In Mind --- Support the Cause: Donate Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

300 posted on 10/03/2006 12:15:21 PM PDT by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 541-552 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson