Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: defenderSD
You see, once you start legislating special rights for people involved in certain kinds of behavior, then where does it end?

Which is precisely why the government should get out of the marriage business entirely. If the government wasn't bestowing special status on monogamous heterosexual marriages (including Britney Spears' one day marriage, Cher's nine-day marriage, and Anna Nicole Smith's highly peculiar one-year marriage), then other groups wouldn't be clamoring to get their government-issued licenses too.

43 posted on 09/29/2006 10:03:48 AM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker

That's crazy. You're advocating a change in government policy that would lead to the end of the traditional American family and the end of our society as it is today. The rights of monagmous traditional marraige are embedded all though our legal statutes and if you start tearing those rights out of the statutes that would throw our legal system into chaos.


49 posted on 09/29/2006 10:08:02 AM PDT by defenderSD (CO2 is not a pollutant and I am not a polluter when I breathe....you hear that Algore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson