1 posted on
09/27/2006 11:37:37 AM PDT by
presidio9
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: presidio9; Lazamataz
2 posted on
09/27/2006 11:39:45 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: presidio9
3 posted on
09/27/2006 11:40:08 AM PDT by
OPS4
(Ops4 God Bless America!)
To: presidio9
I thought those were stretch marks.
To: presidio9
I have a better question, who cares?
5 posted on
09/27/2006 11:41:37 AM PDT by
RetiredArmy
(The DNC - Marxist Party of America for Socialists, Commies, and Homosexuals!)
To: presidio9
...wife of obscure Florentine merchant Francesco del Giocond, and that Leonardo started painting it in 1503.Obscure merchant, Francesco del Giocond. Well, it's five hundred years later and folks still know his name and what his profession was. That's not too obscure.
6 posted on
09/27/2006 11:42:28 AM PDT by
Sax
To: presidio9
Where was Bill Clinton at that time????
7 posted on
09/27/2006 11:45:16 AM PDT by
Obadiah
To: presidio9
And for how much was the grant that enabled us to know this? I'll sleep better now, with this knowledge.
;-)
9 posted on
09/27/2006 11:45:35 AM PDT by
kimmie7
(Liberals embrace the sin......Christians embrace the sinner.)
To: presidio9; Sam Cree; Liz; Joe 6-pack; woofie; vannrox; giotto; iceskater; Conspiracy Guy; Dolphy; ..
Art Ping!!!
Ya want on or off this here highly intellectual Art Ping List?
Just Yell
Woofie, Sam Cree, Republicanprofessor
14 posted on
09/27/2006 11:46:54 AM PDT by
woofie
To: presidio9
To: presidio9
Well, now we know the reason for her smile.
16 posted on
09/27/2006 11:49:34 AM PDT by
exit82
(Sorry. You, along with Pluto, have just been voted out of the solar system(from FreeperLasVegasMac).)
To: presidio9
I belong to that uneducated (in art) group that look at a painting and may like it or may not, based on what I see and not someone else's interpretation.
Being politically incorrect means that your opinions don't count (unless they can, somehow, "straighten you out").
Being politically incorrect, I have no right to say anything about the "Mona Lisa"
* I do like it, as a treat to the eyes (can't touch, hear, or smell it) so to me, its value is in what I see and that's excellent. Don't need some liberal explaining to me something I can see with my own eyes...I think they want to put "tinted glasses" on everyone so they will be forced to see things their way.
20 posted on
09/27/2006 11:55:47 AM PDT by
capt. norm
(Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
To: presidio9
Don't go mentioning this in Frisco Texas. Nudity and Pregnancy are not politically correct educational topics.
To: presidio9
Why do you think she was smiling? She was getting hosed big time!
23 posted on
09/27/2006 12:10:23 PM PDT by
Beagle8U
(Ronald Reagan didn't turn me into a Republican....Jimmy Carter did that!!)
To: presidio9
I've always felt Mona Lisa needed eyebrows.
25 posted on
09/27/2006 12:19:15 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: presidio9
It was Tom Hanks...they met while he was filming the DiVinci Code, the had some wine, were talking, their hands accidently touched...well, you know the rest.
To: presidio9
Somebody send me some grant money for my contention that the subject of "The Scream" was a premature ejaculator.
33 posted on
09/27/2006 12:34:08 PM PDT by
toddlintown
(Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
To: presidio9
Duh gee, I thought a man was posed .... that's what Dan Brown said..... if Dan Brown said it, it must be true! /sarc
47 posted on
09/27/2006 1:53:29 PM PDT by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: presidio9
Researchers using three-dimensional technology to study the "Mona Lisa" say the woman depicted in Leonardo da Vinci's 16th century masterpiece was either pregnant or had recently given birth when she sat for the painting
That's not exactly suprising. This was painted in a devoutly Catholic land in the age before birth control. Unless a girl was of the noble classes, she was generally married between 14 and 16, became immediately sexually active, and started bearing children. She would then spend the rest of her life either pregnant or nursing a baby (God's gift to a mothers sanity). That's just the way things were back then. Since "Mona" obviously appears to be old enough for marriage, and since she wasn't a noble, it was a pretty solid bet that she was either pregnant or had young children.
To: presidio9
Is the young lady .......
60 posted on
09/27/2006 4:13:13 PM PDT by
pointsal
(q)
To: presidio9
"...there were no signs of any brush stroke."
He probably used a roller.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson