Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
Gould is one person. Evolution is not Gould, and evolution makes no reference to a deity or lack thereof.

This statement makes no sense - you asked about the difference between two statements is which God is mentioned in one and not the other. Only people can express options - theories can't talk - be they Neo-Darwinist or not. It is obvious many Darwinists are very anti-religion.

Medicine overturns the statement in the Bible that women shall suffer in childbirth.

I have no idea what you are rambling about but it sure does sound like you don't have any children - do you think childbirth is painless?

How are these not anti-religious?

Not sure what you are rambling about. Many evolutionists are very anti-religion.

700 posted on 09/29/2006 6:27:59 AM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]


To: Last Visible Dog
Not sure what you are rambling about. Many evolutionists are very anti-religion.

1. Define "many."

2. Some Mathemetians are anti-religious. Some Bus drivers are anti-religious. Some doormen are anti-religious. There is no linkage.

706 posted on 09/29/2006 6:48:29 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ("Critical Thinking"="I don't understand it so it must be wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies ]

To: Last Visible Dog
Medicine overturns the statement in the Bible that women shall suffer in childbirth.

Bill Cosby in the movie Bill Cosby, Himself quoted comedienne Carol Burnett on the pains of childbirth:

Take your bottom lip and pull it up over your head.

Medicine does not overturn the statement--it provides a chemical amelioration of the pain.

Cheers!

1,016 posted on 10/01/2006 12:16:18 AM PDT by grey_whiskers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 700 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson