LIVE THREAD: Fox Sunday Interview of Bill Clinton

I've thought that for a long time. It started when Clarke moved up his book date to coincide with the 9/11 commission. Then he claimed cover as "a Republican" when it later turned out he'd just voted in the primary---for McCain. (One of those "bitter" McCaniacs---the ones the media is usually so happy to identify?). Then (or Thus) he got bumped downstairs by the Bush NSC---I'll bet Condi's radar honed in on him as a backstabber from the get-go. Then Fox outed him with that "backgrounder" saying just the opposite of everything in his testimony.

The man's a liar and a Clinton tool. I think he was in on the Sandy Berger caper as well. I still can't believe the way that was covered up.

Anyway, for Clinton to fall back on Clarke gives Republicans the perfect opportunity to re-open the entire episode: what was Sandy Berger doing cramming Clarke's memos down his pants?!

The Portrait of Dorian Clinton. Every lie, treason, and felony is embedded into his face, and now his "legacy" is being correctly written. Bravo!

After the interview, my only concern would be if Hillary was President, he would have access to the "red button". I don't want him anywhere near it.

LMBO!

bump

It's about darn time. I have been making the 'eight months' vs. 'EIGHT YEARS' comparison ad nauseum. The MSM wouldn't touch it--they gave Slick a FREE PASS on 9/11.
It's that ultimate IRONY, that Slick HIMSELF, has finally opened up public debate on his disastrous years in charge of national security and his culpability for 9/11.
The irony of his being responsible for FINALLY opening up public discussion of his malfeasance is perfect. Absolutely PERFECT.--stockstrader

Exactly. It is the ultimate irony... and illustrates exactly how STUPID clinton actually is.

(See my latest post on the clintons: THE DRAMATIC INCREASE IN HILLARY CLINTON'S DISCLOSED ASSETS: An Alternative Theory

THE (oops!) INADVERTENT ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON ^{part one}

UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."

CLINTON: 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+ Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

WHY DID BILL CLINTON IGNORE TERRORISM?
Was it simply the constraints of his liberal mindset, or was it something even more threatening to our national security?

'The Path to 9/11' Annotated:
CLIPS, SYNOPSIS, THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS, THE CLINTON JACKBOOT

'The Path to 9/11': CLINTON FAILURE TO ORDER 'PURE KILL' CUT CHANCES OF GETTING BIN LADEN IN HALF

HEAR 'THE PATH TO 9/11' SCREENWRITER:
CLINTON WILLFULLY FAILED TO NAIL BIN LADEN AS MANY AS A DOZEN TIMES: CIA

SOMALIA + RWANDA UNDERSCORE WHY WE MUST DEFEAT THE CLINTONS NOW (ATTENTION NEW YORKERS)

IT TAKES A CLINTON TO RAZE A COUNTRY

BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE)
THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE

UNITED 93:THE CLINTON-9/11 NEXUS
"We have to do it now. We know what happens if we just sit here and do nothing...."

MISSING CLINTON AUDIO! 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
(+Albright-Fulbright-Nobel TERRORISM revelations)

WHY THE CLINTONS FAILED "TO CAPTURE OR KILL THE TALLEST MAN IN AFGHANISTAN"
(DID THEY REALLY WANT TO TAKE HIM OUT ANYWAY?)

ALBRIGHT INDICTS CLINTON FOR TERRORISM FAILURE (and doesn't even know it)

'MAKE IT A RULE' -- PLACE YOUR ORDER FOR OSAMA WITH CLINTON and CO.
(HEAR HILLARY + BILL MAKE THEIR PITCH)

THE (oops!) INADVERTENT (TERRORISM) ADMISSIONS OF BILL + HILLARY CLINTON (HEAR HILLARY IN SF)

HILLARY GOES NUCLEAR
PROLIFERATION IN THE AGE OF CLINTON

THE FAILED, DYSFUNCTIONAL CLINTON PRESIDENCY
(DECONSTRUCTING CLINTON'S HOFSTRA SPEECH) -- part1: clinton's "Brinkley" Lie

AFTERWORD: ON CLINTON SMALLNESS
(BRINKLEY MISSES THE POINT)

PRESIDENTIAL FAILURE, 9/11 + KATRINA

Carpe Mañana: The (bill + hillary) clinton Terrorism Policy
('Can we kill 'em tomorrow?')

CHENEY: CALL THEM REPREHENSIBLE
THE DEMOCRATS ARE GONNA GET US KILLED (kerry, clinton + sandy berger's pants) SERlES₅

sandy berger haberdashery feint
(the specs, not the pants or the socks)

CLINTON TREASON + THE GORELICK WALL

Reverse Gorelick

THE LEFT'S RECKLESS TET-OFFENSIVE-GAMBIT REPLAY:
the left's jihad against America is killing our troops, aiding + abetting the terrorists and imperiling all Americans

CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)

pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic
WHY THE LEFT IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA

The Left's Fatally Flawed "Animal Farm" Mentality
(Why America Must NEVER AGAIN Elect a Democrat President)

WAR AND TREASON AND THE NEW YORK TIMES
(Please see post 65)

IN A 'PINCH': RETHINKING THE FIRST AMENDMENT
(Which came first, the 'journalist' or the traitor?)

PINCH SULZBERGER, PEARL HARBOR + TREASON
WHY WE MUST PROSECUTE THE NEW YORK TIMES

'MISBEGOTTEN' TIMES
(NARROWNESS, MR. SULZBERGER, NOT WIDTH)

WHY BIN LADEN WANTS HOME DELIVERY OF THE NEW YORK TIMES

MORE

'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'
THE ADDRESS

THE (oops!) TRUTH

"In this interdependent world, we should still have a preference for peace over war....

But sometimes we would have these debates where people would say, if I didn't take some military action this very day, people would look down their nose at America and think we were weak. And I always thought of Senator Fulbright.... ⁶

So anytime somebody said in my presence, 'Hey, if you don't do this, people will think you're weak,' I always asked the same question for eight years, 'Can we kill 'em tomorrow?'

I don't think we can bring 'em back tomorrow, but can we kill 'em tomorrow? If we can kill them tomorrow, then we're not weak.... ¹

I learned that as a 20-year-old kid watching Bill Fulbright. Listening."

bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

"Mr. bin Laden used to live in Sudan. He was expelled from Saudi Arabia in '91 and he went to the Sudan.

We'd been hearing that the Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer

"I remember exactly what happened. Bruce Lindsey said to me on the phone, 'My God, a second plane has hit the tower.' And I said, 'Bin Laden did this.' that's the first thing I said. He said, 'How can you be sure?' I said 'Because only bin Laden and the Iranians could set up the network to do this and they [the Iranians] wouldn't do it because they have a country in targets. Bin Laden did it.'

I thought that my virtual obsession ² with him was well placed and I was full of regret that I didn't get him."

bill clinton
Sunday, Sept 3, 2002
Larry King Live

"You know... the job which we should have done ¹... which should have been our primary focus, to find [you know] bin Laden and eliminate al Qaeda."

hillary clinton
Saturday, Jan. 28, 2006
Chitchat with Jane Pauley
San Francisco, CA

... I thank you for this award, even though, in general, I think former presidents and presidents should never get awards. I was delighted when Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize because I thought he earned it, and I thought it was great because he got it as much for what he did after office as when he was in office. In general, I think that the fact that we got to be president is quite honor enough.
bill clinton
Fulbright Prize address
April 12, 2006

"Bill Clinton is still campaigning for the Nobel Peace Prize. But for now, he'll just have to settle for "the political play of the week.": Bill Schneider
CNN
reporting on the Fulbright Prize
April 14, 2006


WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East.
Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk
White House Lobbied For Clinton Nobel Peace Prize Updated
Friday, October 13, 2000
By Rita Cosby



There's been speculation in the last few months that Clinton was pursuing a Mideast peace accord in an effort to win the prize and secure his legacy as president.
AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL



At the time, clinton observed: "I made more progress in the Middle East than I did between Socks and Buddy." Retrospectively, it is clear that clinton's characterization was not correct.

Mia T
Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers

I M P E A C H M E N T
h e a r --c l i n t o n --l o s e --i t

by Mia T, 11.11.05

This legacy confab is in and of itself proof certain of clinton's deeply flawed character, and a demonstration in real time of the way in which the clinton years were about a legacy that was incidentally a presidency.

Madeleine Albright captured the essence of this dysfunctional presidency best when she explained why clinton couldn't go after bin Laden.

According to Richard Miniter, the Albright revelation occurred at the cabinet meeting that would decide the disposition of the USS Cole bombing by al Qaeda [that is to say, that would decide to do what it had always done when a "bimbo" was not spilling the beans on the clintons: Nothing]. Only Clarke wanted to retaliate militarily for this unambiguous act of war.

Albright explained that a [sham] Mideast accord would yield [if not peace for the principals, surely] a Nobel Peace Prize for clinton. Kill or capture bin Laden and clinton could kiss the 'accord' and the Peace Prize good-bye.

If clinton liberalism, smallness, cowardice, corruption, perfidy--and, to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, clinton cluelessness--played a part, it was, in the end, the Nobel Peace Prize that produced the puerile pertinacity that enabled the clintons to shrug off terrorism's global danger.

READ MORE

5 PM CTZ

bump

"ROVE IS A GENIUS!!"

Hey, where did Hillary go?

Not a word on the new "tooling" legislation.

Not a word about tterrorism.

Not a word about anything!

She's going to debate in my hometown on October 20th.

Should I wear a blue dress and a beret??

Thanks - this graphic represents the entire eight years of the clinton presidential term.

bummp

A week ago... Howie Carr had Miniter and Buzz Patterson on his show. Miniter said that Clinton had a "bakers-dozen" chances to get bin Laden. Patterson vouched for 3 alone that happened while he was present.--johnny7

HEAR 'THE PATH TO 9/11' SCREENWRITER:
CLINTON WILLFULLY FAILED TO NAIL BIN LADEN
AS MANY AS A DOZEN TIMES: CIA

"I have heard from other CIA people that there was as many as a dozen incidents, missions, etc. where the will was not there to green-light the operation. And everybody was in place, whether it was a missile attack, a bomb run, an ambush of bin Laden by tribals on the ground, or that they had pinpointed him at Tarnak Farm or his hunting lodge.
There were numerous opportunities. We only focused on one. We used it as sort of an amalgamation of the numerous different opportunities because you can't show a dozen attempts in a movie; and I don't think a lot of people would have been happy if we did that either...."
CYRUS NOWRASTEH
'THE PATH TO 9/11' WRITER, PRODUCER
THE SEAN HANNITY SHOW, SEPT. 8, 2006

READ MORE

If Hillary really does want to be President, she should dump him. Her popularity would climb.

I fully expect this is what she will do. There will be a massive bimbo eruption, and she will file for divorce. The media will swoon for her.

bump

I am watching CNN's "Reliable Sources" and even the panelists on there are shocked at Clinton's behavior. A liberal SF journalist, Debra Saunders even said, Clinton gave a great example of how NOT to give an interview. She said he was wrong to keep bringing up Rupert Murdoch and implying that Chris Wallace would be in big trouble with his boss after this. And she said he blew up and instead he should have gave a quick answer and moved the interview along to easier topics.

It's bad when you own kind (liberals) think you did badly.

Well said!

THAT is the accurate score.....

BUMP

It's bad when you own kind (liberals) think you did badly.

Actually.....it's GOOD. :)

I don't think Debra Saunders is considered a liberal, seems like a lot of her opinion pieces are fairly conservative. I could be wrong.

Bingo!

"I don't think Debra Saunders is considered a liberal, seems like a lot of her opinion pieces are fairly onservative. I could be wrong"

You could be right. I just assumed that she was liberal since she was a woman from San Francisco.