Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope’s Speech Again Demonstrated The Fragility of Islam
Iran Press Service ^ | September 22 2006

Posted on 09/22/2006 3:46:34 PM PDT by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 09/22/2006 3:46:34 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw; watchin; VOA; timestax; xJones; justshutupandtakeit; TopDog2; ThomasMore; Publius6961; ...
If he wanted, and it was not his aim, the Pope Benedict XVI could not perform in a better way to demonstrate the irrationality, the intolerance and the violence of the Muslims when he spoke about relationship between Islam and violence in Germany last week

Islam-list

If people want on or off this list, please let me know.

2 posted on 09/22/2006 3:48:13 PM PDT by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
It's not fragile. It's pathological.
3 posted on 09/22/2006 3:57:12 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
More media spin. Islam isn't fragile. In fact it's quite robust. They preach hate with impunity and dance around the law with amazing agility. They get visas to the west through our own endemic corruption, are educated at our best schools, and surround themselves with cadres of lawyers well acquainted with every backhand technique. Only until changes are made in our own western notions of religion, and legal racketeering under the guise of freedom of religion, will we be able to fight this formidable enemy.
4 posted on 09/22/2006 3:59:39 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

The contradictions of faith and reason that long-existed in Christianity?

Excuse me? Who gave the world its first universities? Might it be church leaders in Paris, Le Monde?

Thomas Aquinas? French! Christian!
Peter Abelard? French! Christian!
The great Summa of the world? Christian monks!

I'm not exactly sure what causes the self-loathing in liberalism and with Europe and the French in particular, but it has created complete historical amnesia.

Harp all you want about Galileo. But look at the traditions of logic and reason, and see in which of the many world cultures it most flourished.

And then realize that that's your own freakin' culture and take some pride in it, d@!%# it!


5 posted on 09/22/2006 4:05:01 PM PDT by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I can well understand why the Muslims are sensitive about any reference at all to the Byzantine Empire. They would just as soon everybody forget about all that "sensitive stuff" from so long ago. Good thing for them that the Muslims murdered all those Christians and defiled all those churches about 60 years later when they took over that Emperor's kingdom, that way we don't have to be subjected to such sensitive matters today. Quick and clean, they killed the Christians and moved on, just the way the Muslims like to do it today.


6 posted on 09/22/2006 4:05:16 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
What is completely ignored by both media and Islamic (sub)animals is the message the pope was trying to convey.

Islam has instead proved that they are stupid as well as barbaric.

The Pope has nothing to apologize for, He made no "blunder" except to think that Muslims (and media for that matter) had enough intelligence to hear the message he was giving.
7 posted on 09/22/2006 4:05:57 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
It's not fragile. It's pathological.

It is fragile in the sense that it demands total and unconditional fealty or it falls apart. To question it is forbidden and in that sense, pathological.

8 posted on 09/22/2006 4:07:07 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

They can't stand the truth.


9 posted on 09/22/2006 4:12:07 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
"Only until changes are made in our own western notions of religion, and legal racketeering under the guise of freedom of religion, will we be able to fight this formidable enemy."

The first step towards that goal is to realize Islam is NOT a religion. It's a totalitarian system of governance, much the same as Hitler's Nazism, and communism. It's just loosely disguised as a religion. Allah is not God. Allah if anything is Satan, the exact opposite, the Koran his bible, Mohammad his demented prophet, and Muslims, having had their brains eviscerated at birth, his "chosen people". It's a dark blood cult, which needs to continuously dance in the blood of who ever opposes them.

10 posted on 09/22/2006 4:19:24 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Islam isn't fragile. In fact it's quite robust.

Yes, indeed. It may be fragile spiritually, but it is quite robust physically. Over 12 million muzzies live in Western Europe now, up from 10,000 50 years ago. They're in Paraguay and multiplying in South America, thank you. In U.S. prisons, patiently working on their rage, waiting to be paroled. U.S. mmigration quotas haven't been affected by 9/11, why that would be RACIST!

11 posted on 09/22/2006 4:21:09 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
“Show me just what Mohammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached”.

O.K. I've been waiting 5 days for an Islamic rebuttal. I for one can't think of anything new that wasn't either evil or inhuman. I haven't seen any Liberal apologist come forth with anything that helped society either. It must be true then!

12 posted on 09/22/2006 4:26:40 PM PDT by moonman (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: moonman

For a whole new take on this, check catholicfundamentalism.com there's a column section with a brand new theory: polygamy, over time, causes lower IQs. Absolutely fascinating and explains a LOT.


13 posted on 09/22/2006 4:30:44 PM PDT by wea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: SpaceBar

It's fragile in the sense of being thin-skinned and also aware of the fact that it cannot stand up to reason or to honest examination. However, it makes up for that by turning its adherents into violent, merciless sociopaths; and unfortunately, that's what we have to contend with now.


15 posted on 09/22/2006 4:31:03 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot
I don't disagree per se, but this still fits:

Pathological:

1. Of or relating to pathology.
2. Relating to or caused by disease.
3. Of, relating to, or manifesting behavior that is habitual, maladaptive, and compulsive: a pathological liar.

16 posted on 09/22/2006 4:31:35 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

HERE HERE!!


17 posted on 09/22/2006 4:33:14 PM PDT by bperiwinkle7 ( In the beginning was the WORD,,,,,,,,,,,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
The simple legal reclassification of Islam as a criminal political ideology (as empirically evidenced through historical record) rather than a religion would cut through certain obstacles like a hot knife through butter.
18 posted on 09/22/2006 4:34:33 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

yeah, but except for THOSE things, what's so bad about it?

i mean, it's not like they go around flying planes into buildings, stoning women to death for phony reasons, or beheading people they don't like.


19 posted on 09/22/2006 4:37:11 PM PDT by drhogan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

It is weak in the sense that the only way it can survive and propagate is by fear. If it were truly strong, it would give people the freedom to come or go as they please. It would not react so defensively at every slight. It knows it is weak and fears its weakness. Freedom kills Islam.





20 posted on 09/22/2006 4:37:33 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson