Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

General Explains Decision to Refrain From Targeting Taliban Funeral
American Forces Press Service ^ | John D. Banusiewicz

Posted on 09/21/2006 6:05:46 PM PDT by SandRat

WASHINGTON, Sept. 21, 2006 – Much has been made in recent days of an aerial photograph taken in Afghanistan that reportedly shows hundreds of Taliban fighters attending a funeral and the decision to refrain from wiping out the gathering militarily. At a Pentagon news conference today, the commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan said the rules of engagement provide all the flexibility needed to take the fight to the enemy and to protect coalition forces, but the decision in this case was not as simple as it might appear to be.

Army Lt. Gen. Karl Eikenberry said the intelligence available to the coalition commander on the ground did, indeed, support the belief that the gathering was for the funeral of a mid-level Taliban operative. “It was also reasonable to believe that, as he looked down at that photograph or looked down at the video, that a number of the people that were standing there at that funeral were Taliban fighters,” the general added.

But it’s what the picture didn’t show that ultimately led to the decision not to strike, Eikenberry said. Just outside the frame, he said, was an Afghan village.

“And it also was reasonable for the commander to conclude from that village that there were probably innocents -- maybe sympathetic to Taliban, but innocents, noncombatants -- that had moved to participate in that funeral,” the general said. And the photo couldn’t rule out the possible presence of women and children, he added.

“So that commander made a decision, based upon our values as a people, based upon our values as a nation, that he would not strike,” Eikenberry said.

The general noted that the enemy has no such values.

“I would point out to everybody that (the coalition commander’s decision not to strike the funeral gathering) stands in very sharp contrast to an enemy that will kill religious leaders wantonly, that will kill teachers in order to intimidate parents to keep their children out of school houses, that will -- as they proved themselves last week -- throw a suicide-bomber at a patriotic governor of Afghanistan who came from his home in Australia to serve his nation. That's what distinguishes us from the enemy,” he said.

“And with regard to our commanders' decisions, our commanders make decisions like this in the field every day, and I have complete confidence in my commanders that they always make the decision for the right -- for the right reasons and in the right way,” he added.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: binladen; funeral; taliban; target
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-258 next last

1 posted on 09/21/2006 6:05:47 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; clintonh8r; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; ...

What say you????? Is someone feeling some heat????


2 posted on 09/21/2006 6:06:34 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Gee, I guess they'd behave and make nice to us too. Incredible. We're gonna' lose this war and lose big. PC will destroy us.


3 posted on 09/21/2006 6:07:32 PM PDT by laweeks (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Their women and children are fair game until they stop targeting ours.


4 posted on 09/21/2006 6:08:33 PM PDT by msnimje (Seriously, if it REALLY were a religion of PEACE, would they have to label it as such?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Does this imply that we trampled upon our values as a nation when we firebombed Dresden and Tokyo?


5 posted on 09/21/2006 6:10:58 PM PDT by Axhandle (Go hang a salami; I'm a lasagna hog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I thought we had weapons that were accurate enough to deal with that situation.


6 posted on 09/21/2006 6:11:07 PM PDT by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
So if some douche bag Intel officer thinks that maybe just maybe there maybe women and children within the strike zone we must not attack.

I think we must get some balls and really fight this war. And not let so called lawyers fight it.

7 posted on 09/21/2006 6:11:17 PM PDT by rocksblues (Liberals will stop at nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I'm going to trust the general who had to make the choice on the spot, rather than second guess his/her decision.


8 posted on 09/21/2006 6:12:20 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
“So that commander made a decision, based upon our values as a people, based upon our values as a nation, that he would not strike,” Eikenberry said. The general noted that the enemy has no such values.

This kind of spirit is what separates us from them.

9 posted on 09/21/2006 6:12:35 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I don't care. Heads should roll, starting with whoever made the decision not to attack.


10 posted on 09/21/2006 6:13:42 PM PDT by Enterprise (Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle
To the Leftie Loonie Losers and Sissies --- YES.
11 posted on 09/21/2006 6:14:32 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
>"Just outside the frame, he said, was an Afghan village."

AKA Terrorist barracks! You schmuckwad general!

12 posted on 09/21/2006 6:14:52 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist (If a monkey bangs away at a typewriter twice a week for ten years it could write an M. Dowd column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
"PC will destroy us."

This thing cuts both ways, imo - had we gone ahead and targeted them we would never hear the end of it from our liberal 'friends'.

13 posted on 09/21/2006 6:15:16 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Was that a concern when we bombed Dresden? BTW, we won that non-PC war.


14 posted on 09/21/2006 6:15:56 PM PDT by toddlintown (Six bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: toddlintown

Nope.


15 posted on 09/21/2006 6:16:42 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

He should be put into millitary prison for the rest of his life for making such a stupid decision. What a jerk!


16 posted on 09/21/2006 6:19:30 PM PDT by FightThePower! (Fight the powers that be!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

No matter what we do will be condemned by our media.

They either are or are NOT the enemy. And if they stand amidst "innocents" and we have the stupidity to not take the punks out, then shame on us. We can't win. We won't win. We don't have the guts to wipe them out.

I just think of what they did to the last two soldiers that were captured (eyes gouged out, mutilated, etc.) and I wonder when we're going to stop pussy-footing around and clean them out. All wars have casualties, and THE HELL WITH THE MEDIA. Boy, I'd hate to be in uniform today. They can find us (we're in uniforms) and we can't find them (they're cowards and hide amongst civilians). Lord All Might, Colonel!


17 posted on 09/21/2006 6:19:36 PM PDT by laweeks (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Axhandle

Does this imply that we trampled upon our values as a nation when we firebombed Dresden and Tokyo?

Don't apply the logic of the past to our times. That would be... barbaric.

(/s)

18 posted on 09/21/2006 6:20:35 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

So, Taliban women and children are worth more than American men, women and children. Nice to know.


19 posted on 09/21/2006 6:20:57 PM PDT by PghBaldy (CNN on Castro - Intestinal Crisis 2006: A People Mourn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

"That's what it looks like to the untrained eye."--George Costanza


20 posted on 09/21/2006 6:21:39 PM PDT by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson