Skip to comments.
Tancredo Slams Administration for Arrest of Bounty Hunter Duane “Dog” Chapman
tancredo.house.gov ^
| 09/15/2006
| Carlos Espinosa
Posted on 09/15/2006 1:18:49 PM PDT by NapkinUser
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 441-450 next last
To: MonroeDNA
You would have stayed, tough guy? Obviously uber macho man, Chapman, didn't.
161
posted on
09/15/2006 2:17:46 PM PDT
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Dane
"Obviously uber macho man, Chapman, didn't."
Dane, let me state the obvious, you didn't answer the question.
To: Dane
What would you have done, armchair quarterback?
Now let's hear you hem and haw, and not answer the question.
"I wouldn't have done it in the first place" Comes to mind.
To: r9etb
So in short working with about 100 members of his own party doesnt count in your estimation. What exactly would convince you that he was working with the WH and his own party on this issue?
164
posted on
09/15/2006 2:20:21 PM PDT
by
mthom
To: PRND21
Bounty-hunting is illegal in Mexico. He is a criminal and Tancredo is a hypocrite. So is having a single round of 9mm, .45 ACP, 7.62x51 or 5.56 ammunition.
165
posted on
09/15/2006 2:21:31 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: NapkinUser
Dane, let me state the obvious, you didn't answer the question. I did answer the question. First of all I didn't skip bail in Mexico, Chapman did.
Second Chapman is the one who is considered uber brave and uber macho, with his skipping bail, it proves he is neither.
Like I said if he been convicted in a Mexican court, the resulting publicity would have realeased him, but with his cowardly skipping of bail he made that all moot.
166
posted on
09/15/2006 2:22:38 PM PDT
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Dane
Why the contempt for Dog? Because he gets the bad guys? That's what he does you know--gets the bad guys.
167
posted on
09/15/2006 2:23:01 PM PDT
by
RichRepublican
(Some days you're the windshield--some days you're the bug.)
To: Tulsa Ramjet
Tell you what Fox, we will trade one thousand illegal mexicans for one illegal american. What a deal! The problem with that is they, the Mexican government, don't want them back.
168
posted on
09/15/2006 2:23:08 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: Racehorse
"Bounty hunters? Fry em."
I see - it really has nothing to do with legalities, just your opinion concerning bounty hunters.
Have you been arrested before?
169
posted on
09/15/2006 2:23:09 PM PDT
by
Timothy
To: PRND21
But the Chinese who tell the truth in China are criminals, in China.
If they are american, should we capture them, and send them to China?
Same thing.
To: El Gato
So is having a single round of 9mm, .45 ACP, 7.62x51 or 5.56 ammunition.That's a problem I'd like to see fixed.
171
posted on
09/15/2006 2:24:39 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: mthom
What exactly would convince you that he was working with the WH and his own party on this issue? Oh, I don't know. All I have is press releases like this one, that conclusively proves that he's not interested in working with them.
These PR salvos are great for fundraising, but at the same time they pretty much guarantee that Tancredo will be on the outside looking in.
172
posted on
09/15/2006 2:25:22 PM PDT
by
r9etb
To: MonroeDNA
But the Chinese who tell the truth in China are criminals, in China.I'll let Dog know.
173
posted on
09/15/2006 2:26:01 PM PDT
by
PRND21
To: Dane
"Like I said if he been convicted in a Mexican court, the resulting publicity would have released him, but with his cowardly skipping of bail he made that all moot."
You obviously know nothing about Mexico or it's politics - he would have probably been killed had he gone into a Mexican prison. He took a very rich and powerful man who had paid important people for protection.
174
posted on
09/15/2006 2:26:19 PM PDT
by
Timothy
To: Dane
He jumped bail because Mexico is a corrupt third world nation and what he did kind of hurts the Mexican business of taking bad guys in for money.
Chapman has money, so first look for Mexico to hold a gun to his head in fines compared to most other people.
Then look for them to jail them as an example to others who would think to do something regarding this drug cartel run third world nation.
175
posted on
09/15/2006 2:26:35 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: RichRepublican
Why the contempt for Dog? Because he gets the bad guys? That's what he does you know--gets the bad guys. If he would have been a man and faced his charges in Mexico this would have been moot.
What type of Judge, even a Mexican one would send a man to prison for capturing a rapist.
JMO, Chapman should have faced the Mexican charges and IMO would have been acquitted, but we will never know since he cowardly skipped bail and dug himself a deeper hole.
176
posted on
09/15/2006 2:27:43 PM PDT
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: A CA Guy
For the record, I always received good cooperation from the Mexican illegal community when tracking a rapist of that particular group.
But they were always amazed that the government would would expend the resources when the victim was a 'nobody' and didn't have a rich relative.
Just for once, I'd like to see this Administration butch up and tell Mexico to p#ss up a rope.
To: PRND21
"You failed to source a lie to me on this thread."I am sure that made sense to you. Perhaps you need a bunny with a pancake on it's head.
To: NapkinUser
Because he's not a lapdog for your hero, president George W. Bush?Because Tancredo is both a Buchananite and a self-serving, sanctimonious, sorry excuse for a legislator. Because Tancredo the House version of the Senate's McCain -- no, not McCain, but the latter's toady, Lindsay Graham. Because, as I said in my earlier post, Tancredo, a supposed Republican (but actually a true RINO*), never has a good word to say about the Republican President or administration.
(*Republicans in name only don't always tilt left. Some tilt to the far edge of the other direction.)
To: r9etb
Working with the WH on this issue means one thing: Assenting to allowing illegals to stay and get on a path to citizenship. What meaningful concessions could one expect from the WH on this issue?
180
posted on
09/15/2006 2:28:51 PM PDT
by
mthom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 441-450 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson