Skip to comments.
The Path to 911 Live Thread (Part II)
Freepers everywhere ^
| 09/11/06
| mware
Posted on 09/11/2006 2:02:14 PM PDT by mware
Edited on 09/11/2006 4:11:51 PM PDT by Admin Moderator.
[history]
I will not be here for the first hour of tonights program. Thought I would put it up for those FReepers overseas that are viewing it now.
For those who wish to see the clips the Clinton lawyers complained about, Click here
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: clintoonsucks; partii; pathto911; usscole; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 2,481-2,483 next last
To: CharlesWayneCT
And the show made it pretty clear that O'Neill wasn't pushed out because of Bush.
To: Mo1
962
posted on
09/11/2006 6:24:20 PM PDT
by
Ladysmith
((NRA, SAS) Gun owners have illustrated rights are individual and can be protected by individuals.)
To: pollyannaish
Looks like that McNeil thing with the NT Times got cut.
My bet that was the last shot at Clinton.
963
posted on
09/11/2006 6:24:44 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
("For seven million extra, we could have avoided a billion dollar WOT.")
To: TheLion
I caught 30 seconds of Timmy Russert and it was one big democratic commercial! What a stupid jerk. The guy is just so dumb.
To: CharlesWayneCT
This is still August 2001, right?
965
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:04 PM PDT
by
rintense
(Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
To: DollyCali
Yes. They did not write her part favorably...
966
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:17 PM PDT
by
Donna Lee Nardo
(DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
To: mylife
According to Cyrus Nowrasteh, the writer, there are NO CUTS from tonight's program. Only 71 seconds were removed, censored, from last night. ˝G
967
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:35 PM PDT
by
GRRRRR
(Love America? Protect Her, VOTE GOP...they're better than nothing.)
To: rintense
Yes. The plan was on the president's desk a day or two before 9/11 and this was testified to at the 9/11 Commission hearings by all the parties who wrote the plan.
968
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:35 PM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
To: Recovering Ex-hippie
Russert wears it on his sleave but hes actually a pretty good interviewer ;)
969
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:49 PM PDT
by
mylife
(the roar of the mHullo old friendasses could be farts)
To: A.Hun
That's why I rely on those wiser than I.
I figure once I reach 200, I'll be old enough to have a clue. ;-)
To: mware
Of course they could have done some more editing. They did. They also added the disclaimer about "fictionalized" scenes. Now what that means is that the exact words and conversations are not necessarily what actually transpired. It doesn't mean that the events and the "gist" of the conversations did not occur.
BTW, it looks to me like the source of much of the "insider" information, for both administrations is likely Richard Clarke. Two reasons I say that. 1) Some of the stuff consists of things *only* he could know about, directly at least. 2). He's coming off much too clean. Like the story that ends "There you stand so spic and span, where where you when the "stuff" hit the fan". Of course guess where the "stuff" came from?
971
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:53 PM PDT
by
El Gato
To: rintense
I think so. Man, how's THAT for irony? J.O. getting the job of security for the twin towers. Oy vay!
972
posted on
09/11/2006 6:25:55 PM PDT
by
RedCell
("...thou shalt kill thine enemy before he killeth you by any means available" - Dick Marcinko)
To: Hillarys Gate Cult
The NYT must love that shot... after trashing John O'Neill and releasing state secrects.
973
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:00 PM PDT
by
rwilson99
(95% of Al-Jazzera Viewers Agree... the world is less safe (for them) since 9/11)
To: Indy Pendance
We are officially at WAR. The authority Congress gave Bush first for Afganistan and then for Iraq......makes it so.
974
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:04 PM PDT
by
stocksthatgoup
("Is it real? Or is it Reuters?")
To: Peach
975
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:09 PM PDT
by
rintense
(Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
To: EQAndyBuzz
No EQAndyBuzz,what was it?
976
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:16 PM PDT
by
fatima
To: Donna Lee Nardo
Did you see the look on everyones faces when McNeil said he was going to work at the WTC.
Conspiracy theorists are going to have a big O over that one.
977
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:18 PM PDT
by
EQAndyBuzz
("For seven million extra, we could have avoided a billion dollar WOT.")
To: GRRRRR
Im calling BS on that one
978
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:20 PM PDT
by
mylife
(the roar of the mHullo old friendasses could be farts)
To: Donna Lee Nardo
The actor playing Clark really had the bugeyed (crazy a$$) look down.
979
posted on
09/11/2006 6:26:30 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
( I am sitting under my cone of silence, inside a copper wire cage wearing a tin foil hat...)
To: Peach
Yes, we were close. We had an actual plan, not the crap Clinton's team kept throwing together piecemeal. It's just that Clinton hadn't done enough to hold off the attacks.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 2,481-2,483 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson