Life 2.0 (Science plays God)

The Economist ^ | 9/10/06 | The Economist

[ml1954]

Not getting enough attention on the thread? Too bad.

[Mamzelle]

re: Why is it that the Macroevolutionists seem to always try to get the last post on what end out becoming crevo threads?)))

Because they have an archive of spam.

This stuff has been posted by the same posters, hundreds of times. It's one of the vagaries of the internet--you can shut down discussion just by shunting in truckloads of what has already been hashed and rehashed.

[Dimensio]

You have an interesting hypothesis, however you neglected to provide or reference any evidence for your claims.

[Dimensio]

This stuff has been posted by the same posters, hundreds of times.

If creationists would stop making the same repeatedly debunked claims, it would not be necessary for us to continue referencing the same refutatians.

[RadioAstronomer]

Showering down what you obviously consider to be support for missing links isn't going to fly. In many cases, fossils of the supposed end species are dated as being earlier than that of the missing link. Others have superficially appeared to be transitional species and have later been declared to be unrelated.

You read those (more than 50) links in 14 minutes?

You remind me of the guy with his fingers in his ears going "la la la" At the top of his voice.

[RadioAstronomer]

This stuff has been posted by the same posters, hundreds of times.

It is because the average creationist here refuses to learn and keeps spouting the same nonsense thread after thread.

This continual spouting of nonsense that has been refuted for more than the five years I have been here is nothing more than a form of disruption. It detracts from the original intent of the thread.

Thusly, once again the creationists trash a perfectly good science thread.

[Mamzelle]

Some of them were pinged from outside, in case you didn't notice. But evos without religious conservatives make for just another low-subscription and poorly attended thread...like in another forum I know.

[RadioAstronomer]

just another low-subscription and poorly attended thread...like in another forum I know.

HAHAHAHAHAHA! Gads. I bet you spend more time over there than I do.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Wouldn't a prudent person bother to learn about a subject before pontificating upon it or making blanket claims about it?

LOL!

Now you're being silly. ;)

[ml1954]

[VadeRetro]

It is because the average creationist here refuses to learn and keeps spouting the same nonsense thread after thread.

When you're trolling for suckers, it doesn't matter if some aren't taking the bait (or why) so long as you think some are.

[Gumlegs]

Oooo! Font size seven. Case closed.

[Truth-The Anti Spin]

I for one welcome our new bio-robot overlords.

[PatrickHenry]

Help for new visitors to the evolution debate
Another service of Darwin Central, the conspiracy that cares.

If you're interested in learning about evolution, visit The List-O-Links.
If you'd like to understand the concept of speciation, visit Micro-evolution, Macro-evolution, and Speciation.
If you're serious about debating this issue, see How to argue against a scientific theory.
If you're permanently stuck on stupid, but determined to post anyway, use the Evolution Troll's Toolkit.

[Right Brother]

Give me one example where order and complexity are known to arise from a non intelligent cause

The Democratic National Convention?

[metmom]

Oh, OK. You gotta point.

[js1138]

but man was CREATED perfect

Perfection apparently includes the quality of degenerating.

[atlaw]

Data-dump placemarker.

[RogueIsland]

Snowflakes are just evidence that water molecules behave according to the laws of chemistry and physics.

Exactly! And DNA is just evidence that certain organic molecules behave according to the laws of chemistry and physics. I think you've done an excellent job here of revealing ID to be utter bollocks.

[freedumb2003]

Humanity could return to its state before the Flood

What Flood? There was no Flood.