John Bolton, the best man at the right time in the UN.
To: M. Espinola
You can say that again. We need him.
To: M. Espinola
I think we should send Iran some weapons!
To: M. Espinola
How is it independent when Japan, Germany, France and Britain are involved?
5 posted on
08/26/2006 12:58:45 PM PDT by
ndt
To: M. Espinola
Oh no! Independent sanctions!
The Ayatollahs are shaking in their turbans.
Independent airstrikes, well, that's a different story.
6 posted on
08/26/2006 12:59:48 PM PDT by
JHBowden
(Speaking truth to moonbat.)
To: M. Espinola
Since sanctions worked so we in iraq, we should all get ready for all the glorious successes we are going to have with sanctions on iran......
WTF....without sanctions saddam would never have been found in that spider hole.
7 posted on
08/26/2006 1:03:09 PM PDT by
no-to-illegals
( 'no' always causes a mad rush to counter.)
To: M. Espinola
sanctions outside of the framework of the UN I hope this is code for something else.
To: M. Espinola
my goodness, it is another peace in our time moment....
leave me alone, I want to enjoy it...the moment....
10 posted on
08/26/2006 1:05:11 PM PDT by
no-to-illegals
( 'no' always causes a mad rush to counter.)
To: M. Espinola
I thought we already had sanctions ... since, 1979?
13 posted on
08/26/2006 1:09:13 PM PDT by
shield
(A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
To: M. Espinola
"The US believes that Japan and the European trio - Germany, France, and Britain – will provide the base for international rallying outside the Security Council in the case that Russia and China block the sanctions."
France? Maybe the US also believes in Santa Claus... Ignore the French, they have not missed an opportunity to stab Bush in the back, so why are they even bothering with these a*holes.
15 posted on
08/26/2006 1:11:51 PM PDT by
observer5
(It's not a War on Terror - it's a WAR ON STUPIDITY)
To: M. Espinola
How about some bunker-buster sanctions?
20 posted on
08/26/2006 1:18:22 PM PDT by
Rummyfan
To: DoctorZIn; SJackson; Alouette; ex-Texan; Convert from ECUSA; familyop
24 posted on
08/26/2006 1:31:32 PM PDT by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is not free)
To: M. Espinola
*BUMP* !
25 posted on
08/26/2006 1:45:37 PM PDT by
ex-Texan
(Mathew 7: 1 - 6)
To: M. Espinola
WE: Us doesn't speak for everyone.
28 posted on
08/26/2006 2:23:51 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
To: M. Espinola
Economic sanctions mean nothing. They never have and the never will. To think that such sacntions can accomplish anything is to put your head in the sand. In a world where everyone is cutting a secret deal, only force on a large scale will bring the desired results.
To: M. Espinola
What about US media identity "silencio" for the Italians? Will Italy continue to work with the mullahs?
Payvand's Iran News ... 8/6/03
Huge recovery in Iran's exports to EU
"
The increase in Iranian exports was dominated by the rise in EU oil imports to eur 1.5 bn. It was led by Italy, Iran's biggest market, whose imports grew by eur 130 m to eur 500 m."
32 posted on
08/26/2006 3:20:29 PM PDT by
familyop
("Either you're with us, or you're with the terrorists." --pre-Road-Map President Bush)
To: M. Espinola
Sanctions will be worthless. If China and Russia trade with Iran and idiots with money like Chavez support Iran, we will have no impact and Iran will have the bomb, as will every two-bit terrorist within 1000 miles of Teheran.
The only way to stop this fanatic is to use force.
To: M. Espinola
We've had sanctions on Iran for almost 30 years. Obviously, they don't work.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson