She can beat Nelson. The polls are bogus. Nelson's approval rating is not that high & when she gets done informing Floridians that he's been doing nothing for 6 years but voting with the liberals.....she will be elected!
Posted on 08/25/2006 7:47:48 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
It's like it is being run by people who want to lose.
No viable candidate wants to be a speed bump. So you put up a disposable candidate. She's basically Kleenex.
I think she's just so desperate that she feels she's gotta pull out all the stops.
Exactly -- it is all about looks because it certainly cannot be adoration of her brainpower!
Her campaign is terrible. A good friend of mine cannot believe anyone on here is still defending her! My only hope is that someone will come up and beat her in the primary!
I hope that, too. But with Leroy Collins, Jr. being pro-abort and Will McBride supporting open borders, all that leaves is the completely unknown Peter Monroe.
"It's like it is being run by people who want to lose."
That's what common sense Freepers have been thinking. If I were conspiracy-minded, I would swear that she was being mind-controlled by the left nto deliberately losing this race.
Did you catch this one?
This is classic "stoopid party," priceless
Courts didn't "make up" the law.
Time to refute your sourceless falsehood again.
"As we have seen the basis of Common Law was custom. The itinerant justices set out by William the Conqueror examined the different local practises of dealing with disputes and crime, filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones, and ended up with a set of laws which were to be applied uniformly throughout the country."
That's sorta what I already said.
(and deciding which local custom, practices, etc., to use and not to use).
Arbitrarily? Source, please.
who were these itinerant justices??? Why, judges of the court set forth by the Crown.
and what do you call the process these judges of the court were engaged in whereby they examined, filtered, the customs and practices as to ended up with laws to be applied??? Why, they were making up laws via this process.
Arbitrarily? Source, please.
Did the orignal poster say "arbitrarily" anywhere in his reply? Or did you just arbitrarily altered someone else's reply?
To use your own quote again "As we have seen the basis of Common Law was custom. The itinerant justices set out by William the Conqueror examined the different local practises of dealing with disputes and crime, filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones , and ended up with a set of laws which were to be applied uniformly throughout the country."
filtered our the less practical and reasonable ones certainly sounds like (and deciding which local custom, practices, etc., to use and not to use).
Just the fundies who want to eject all non-Christians, especially those who don't believe in a creator like tham there hindooos, boodists, and maybe even them joooos, since they don't belong in a Christian Nation.
Maybe she can guarantee the Bucs a playoff spot...
I tell you what....
For someone whose campaign and associated harpies seem to LOVE TO rail against the media for causing all of her problems, she certainly knows how to give them more ammo to use against her.
I'm for someone WINNING against Nelson which Harris can't do. McBride or Collins for me. I'm sort of leaning towards Collins because of the name recognition factor plus his dad actually was a good governor.
She can beat Nelson. The polls are bogus. Nelson's approval rating is not that high & when she gets done informing Floridians that he's been doing nothing for 6 years but voting with the liberals.....she will be elected!
So if Harris will win the primary anyway, then it doesn't hurt to vote for Collins, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.