Posted on 08/24/2006 6:54:24 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
Scientists at Texas Tech University argue that defining mammalian species based on genetics will result in the recognition of many more species than previously thought present. This has profound implications for our knowledge of biodiversity and issues based on it, such as conservation, ecology, and understanding evolution. Their study is published in the latest Journal of Mammalogy.
The classical definition of species was proposed by Ernst Mayr in 1942, defining it as reproductively isolated groups of organisms. According to this study, the problem with applying this concept is that it is hard to observe mating and to know whether there is interbreeding between populations and thus creation of hybrid species. Traditionally, species have been recognized based on physical characteristics, although it has been assumed that species differences are inherited and thereby reflect genetic differences.
Study researchers Robert Baker and Robert Bradley define “species” based on genetic data. The new definition distinguishes species that are genetically isolated from one another. Baker and Bradley’s genetic species concept also differs from the phylogenetic species concept proposed by Joel Cracraft in 1989 by emphasizing genetic isolation and protection of the integrity of the gene pool.
New molecular techniques for sequencing genes provide far greater resolution than was previously available. They also allow researchers to quantify problems in understanding the process of speciation. Using genetic data, it is now possible to distinguish species that are morphologically similar — those known as cryptic species. It is also possible to identify species that hybridize but have gene pools that are protected from one another.
The result of using genetic data is that species can be identified that cannot be distinguished using other methods. Baker and Bradley point out that this means there are doubtless many more species than previously thought. They hypothesize that there are 2,000 more mammalian species than are currently recognized.
According to the authors, this means that we will need to rethink the nature of speciation in mammals, barriers that evolve to produce genetic isolation between species, and how diverse mammals are, as well as other species-based issues such as those relating to conservation and zoonoses, communicable diseases from animals to humans.
To read the entire study, click here. SPECIATION IN MAMMALS AND THE GENETIC SPECIES CONCEPT (PDF file, 20 pages long)
Personally, I am offended by folks who add fruity concoctions to gin and call it a Martini.
_______
LOL. apple martinis, bah humbug. That's a shooter not a martini.
But to be purely technical, isn't an olive a fruit?
Gimme a banana).
________
Anything you want, macaca.
It was another day.
Not when it's stuffed with pimento.
Yesterday someone tried to paint Darwin as a racist because the word appears in the subtitle of "Origins."
____
I think that actually happens on 90 percent of all evo threads.
but a pimento is also a fruit.
what to do, what to do?
There's more to a pimento than merely being a fruit. For some, it can also be a way of life. But that's a topic for another thread.
But, what a boon to Endangered Species Enviroactivists! Think of all the land they can sequester with this.
Jaded Placemarker
Anyone wanting to use a new genetic quantitative method will need make sure that the differing human races do not become different species using the new technique, as their is a fair amount of genetic variation represented therein.
This evening, I will carefully conduct an appropriate inquiry into any subtle distinctions between an olive and a stuffed olive employed as a Bombay Saphire Martini garnishment. Don't expect a cogent written essay, however.
Boy have you got that right. To take JAMES BOND's drink and make it into a chick drink is blasphemy. Every time I see a guy order an "apple martini" I want to ask him where his skirt is.
"Endangered Genetic Marker act"? ;)
No allele left behind.
I guess I could use CR/Ider "logic" and say "SEE? Pluto isn't a planet!! All these years they have been teaching us a LIE! ASTRONOMY isn't a SCIENCE!"
LOL
Piltdown Planet! Teach the controversy!
I just was talking to my neighbor, the one with the '54 Ford pickup truck. Okay, that doesn't serve well to id him since many of my neighbors have '54 Ford pickup trucks. Anyway, I mentioned the eight planets and he thought I was nuts. Can you imagine somebody who drives a '54 Ford pickup thinking somebody else nuts?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
