Posted on 08/20/2006 3:50:38 PM PDT by neverdem
ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Joe Lieberman, attacked by fellow Democrats as being too close to the White House on the Iraq War, on Sunday called on Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to resign but said the United States cannot "walk away" from the Iraqis.
Lieberman, the one-time Democratic vice presidential candidate, is running as an independent in his bid for a fourth term since losing the Democratic nomination to newcomer Ned Lamont, who harnessed voters' anger against the war in Iraq.
Lieberman, an early supporter of the Iraq war, said he had called for Rumsfeld to step down in 2003.
"With all respect to Don Rumsfeld, who has done a grueling job for six years, we would benefit from new leadership to work with our military in Iraq," he said on CBS' "Face the Nation."
Lieberman said the Bush administration should have sent more troops into Iraq "to secure the country."
"We had a naive vision that the Iraqis were going to embrace us and then go on and live happily ever after," he said.
Lieberman said the administration must "put severe pressure on the Iraqis to contain sectarian violence."
"There is still hope in Iraq and as long as there is we cannot just pick up and walk away and leave them to the sure disaster that would follow and would compromise our security in the war on terrorism," he said.
The Lamont campaign issued a statement Sunday criticizing Lieberman for trying to "paint himself as courageous for clinging to the failed 'stay the course' policy in Iraq and not listening to the voters of Connecticut on the need to change course."
"His new found 'criticism' of the war won't convince Connecticut voters after so many years of stubbornly rubber-stamping Bush's failed policies," the statement said.
The war in Iraq was the hallmark of Lamont's primary campaign. He calls for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from what he often refers to as "a bloody civil war," and says he believes that those who got America into the conflict should be held accountable.
Lieberman accused Lamont of distorting his stance on Iraq.
"He made me into a cheerleader for George Bush and everything that's happened," Lieberman said. "And the record shows that, while I believe we did the right thing in overthrowing Saddam Hussein, I've been very critical over the years, particularly in 2003 and 2004, about the failure to send enough American troops to secure the country, about the absence of adequate plans and preparation to deal with post-Saddam Iraq."
"As bad as things are now - and they've gotten worse in the last six months - it would be a disaster if America set a deadline and said we're getting all of our troops out by a given date," Lieberman said. "That's a position Ned Lamont has taken."
Tom Swan, campaign manager for Lamont, said Sunday the campaign stands by its criticism of Lieberman as being too close to President Bush.
Asked about Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who was quoted as saying that Lieberman echoes Republicans, Lieberman said it was "just plain politics by somebody who has ambitions of his own."
"I voted 90 percent of the time with a majority of Democrats in the U.S. Senate," he said.
"I'm worried that my party may become what we've accused the Republicans of, a kind of litmus-test party," he said. "If you don't agree with us 100 percent of the time, you don't agree with us. I'm devoted to the Democratic Party."
A new Quinnipiac University poll shows Lamont is trailing Lieberman by 12 percentage points among likely voters. It said much of Lieberman's advantage comes from his popularity among Republicans and unaffiliated voters, the largest voting block in Connecticut.
Rumsfeld replies: I am more likely than Joe Lieberman to have a job in January 2007.
*Lieberman telephone call to HRC headquarters*
"Is this enough for your endorsement now, Hillary?"
Instead of saying what they really mean, a lot of politicians say what the focus groups tell them they need to say.
They may not have exactly "embraced us" but I daresay most welcomed the end of Saddam's regime. Even Lieberman himself admitted in the Wall Street Journal piece he wrote last November that landed him in such hot water that the "insurgency" likely consists of around 10,000 people. And I'd say most of them are likely foreign jihadists. I think Iraqis certainly were more welcoming of a US presence at the start of the war than now, but to claim if they're not making love to our soldiers in the street they must be against us is a bit of a false choice. I think most would say they need us there to help get things under control, but hope we'll be able to leave soon.
So why are Republicans supporting Lieberman?
I hope Rumsfeld gives Lieberman a healthy "Oh, my goodness!"
I don't see how Bush COULD fire Rummy, not with Hitlery calling for his resignation.
Good points, all of them. Hard to tell if this is bone throwing to the leftists from Lieberman or what.
I'm a person who will say that I've been dismayed at various decisions in the invasion and occupation that haven't been real smart.
I'm not sure that anyone else would've done much better, but... yeah, Rummy sure could've used 250,000 more troops as Saddam fell.
2) Supports national defense
"Supports national defense"
sans Dick Rumsfeld
Ahhh good old dependable Loserman! Once a weasel always a weasel. Quite frankly I could care less about Connecticut. The state loses either way. I personally think that naseled wimp should be the one to quit, supporter or the war or not!
Is there even one Democrat on the face of Mother Earth, who has a plan that is better than Donald Rumsfeld's? If so, would that person please stand up and tell us what it is, short of cutting and running.
I'd like to ask folks here as well.
What type of suggestion would you like to make toward ending the violence in Iraq?
Further, what type of action would you like to suggest to end the no-stop car bombing in Baghdad?
He aint the "Decider"
It's pretty pitiful when Joe Lieberman is the GOP's hope in Connecticut.
Liebermans way of showing the dims he is still a liberal dimocrat and not a conservative patsy . He should spend more time trying to keep his own job , and let Rummy alone . . .
Ahhh good old dependable Loserman! Once a weasel always a weasel.You nailed it.
Because the GOP doesn't have a winning candidate to run against Lieberman and Joe is alot less lethal than Lamont.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.