Posted on 08/18/2006 10:36:53 AM PDT by Renfield
BRUSSELS (AFP) - France faced criticism in the European press for not offering more troops for southern Lebanon, which was seen as jeopardizing the UN force's difficult task of imposing peace.
"France has relaxed the pressure at a vital moment," The Times of London said, accusing Paris in an editorial of backing down from earlier indications that it was ready to play the leading role in the enlarged UN force.
"For France to have retreated from a key role to the realm of 'symbolic' gestures 'symbolises' only one thing: a French loss of nerve," it said Friday after having previously praised French efforts to find a solution to the crisis.
Despite expectations that France would provide the bulk of a planned 15,000 strong UN force, Paris said Thursday it would send 200 troops to reinforce the UN mission in Lebanon.
While it said France was prepared to command the enlarged force, it also called for safety guarantees for its soliders before making further commitments.
The enlarged peacekeeping force is the keystone in UN Resolution 1701, which outlines the ceasefire and a deployment of Lebanese and international troops to the south of the country to fill the vacuum left by withdrawing Israeli units.
Polish newspaper Rzeczpospolita said: "France made a huge diplomatic effort so that resolution 1701 could be voted. Now it's France that is holding up the application of this resolution."
It said that "Paris does not want its soldiers to run the risk of being caught in the crossfire, with Hezbollah militants on one side and the Israeli army on the other".
Italian newspaper La Repubblica, said France had discovered "that it was afraid" while La Stampa said that Paris and Rome "fear another Bosnia".
Many potential contributors to the force, including France, have expressed concern over the role their soldiers will play and have sought assurances from the United Nations and Lebanon on the conditions of the deployment.
Defending the government's decision, leftwing French newspaper Liberation said France was right to demand a clearer mandate before sending more troops.
"When a country such as France is to commit thousands of men for years to a situation that has everything in place to become a quagmire, it's better to have a clear mission. Chirac is in his right to demand a minimum of ambiguities," it said.
In a similar vein, conservative French newspaper Le Figaro said: "This is a highly dangerous mission. If France volunteered to lead it's because it's an opportunity to make a comeback in the Middle East, where (France) has been sidelined by American unilateralism.
"However, the rest of the world cannot step aside and leave France holding the hot potato alone with a help from a few Europeans and the inevitable blue helmets from Fiji."
But Spanish newspaper El Mundo warned that caution could cost the force its effectiveness.
"The reticence shown by France to provide the majority of the 15,000 blue helmets could slow the deployment", it said.
While taking a broader European view, Spanish newspaper El Pais echoed a similar warning, saying that "European countries' doubts about the complexity and the risk of the UN mission in southern Lebanon endanger the deployment of the 15,000 troops."
The story is not that France weaseled out. The story is, why did so many people take them seriously in the first place?
Actually it makes the UN and Europe look like week
But that's nothing new
The French lose their nerve??? Say it ain't so............
Les Froggies are punking out because they're afraid of getting killed again by Hizb'Allah.
The French would rather depend on the kindness of others to rid the world of terrorist child-killers.
My tagline says it all
Where is France's vaunted Foreign Legion?
The French are almost as Qa Wurdly as the Islamo-fascist terrorists who hide behind children.
And they would rather trade weapons for Oil on the sly than actually contribute to a real solution to the problem.
"Despite expectations that France would provide the bulk of a planned 15,000 strong UN force, Paris said Thursday it would send 200 troops to reinforce the UN mission in Lebanon."
Since when has anyone's Expectations of France been high?
Their track record remains the same.
As long as their 200 soldiers can hold the maginot line, they will be ok.
I heard on the radio last night that France was only going to send 400 troops after all. What a bunch of wimps! That's quite a snow job they gave the US. I'm surprised that Bush keeps falling for their BS!
You've got that right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.