Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Israeli prime minister accepts U.N. cease-fire deal
Yahoo News ^ | 09/11/2006 | By KARIN LAUB

Posted on 08/11/2006 3:58:31 PM PDT by garbageseeker

JERUSALEM - Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert endorsed an emerging Mideast cease-fire deal late Friday, after a day of dramatic day brinksmanship including a threat to expand the ground war in Lebanon.

The agreement calls for the deployment of 30,000 Lebanese and U.N. troops along the Israel-Lebanon border. It falls short of some of Israel's demands, including a strong mandate for the U.N. forces to take on Hezbollah guerrillas.

However, the draft is the best chance yet for peace after more than four weeks of war that has killed more than 800 people, destroyed Lebanon's infrastructure and inflamed tensions across the Middle East.

Neither the Lebanese government nor Hezbollah has said publicly whether they would sign on to the deal, but it was widely assumed that they did not object to it. Plans to take the resolution to a vote were announced in New York shortly after U.S. Mideast envoy, Assistant Secretary of State David Welch, met for a second time Friday with Lebanese Prime Minister Fuad Saniora.

Israeli officials said Israel would not halt fighting until Israel's Cabinet has approved the cease-fire deal in its weekly meeting Sunday. It was not immediately clear whether the military would expand its ground offensive in the time remaining, or would only hold existing positions.

Only six hours passed from an initial decision by Olmert to broaden the ground offensive to his acceptance of the cease-fire deal. The zigzag reflected Israel's dilemma after a month of inconclusive fighting.

Israel has been unable to defeat Hezbollah and was concerned about growing Israeli casualties, as well as international condemnation, if the war continued. However, Olmert also feared that accepting a deal that does not rein in the guerrillas could lead to another war down the road and hurt him politically.

Olmert's initial order to send troops deeper into Hezbollah territory came even as U.N. Security Council negotiations reached the final stretch in New York.

Several hours later, France and the United States reached agreement on a final draft, to be put to a vote later Friday. The draft would authorize the deployment of 15,000 U.N. peacekeepers in south Lebanon, along with 15,000 Lebanese troops, into the region "as Israel withdraws."

The Security Council, repeatedly accused of taking too long to come up with a response to fighting, would leave out several key demands from both Israel and Lebanon in efforts to come up with a workable arrangement.

"You never get a deal like this with everybody getting everything that they want," Britain's Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett said. "The question is, has everybody got enough for this to stick and for it to be enforceable? Nobody wants to go back to where we were before this last episode started."

Despite Lebanese objections, Israel will be allowed to continue defensive operations, and a dispute over the Chebaa Farms area along the Syria-Lebanon-Israel border will be left for later. Israel won't get its wish for an entirely new multinational force separate from the U.N. peacekeepers that have been stationed in south Lebanon since 1978.

There is also no call for the release of Lebanese prisoners held by Israel or a demand for the immediate withdrawal of Israeli troops. Although the draft resolution emphasizes the need for the "unconditional release" of the two Israeli soldiers whose July 12 capture by Hezbollah sparked the conflict, that call is not included in the list of steps required for a lasting cease-fire.

The ongoing fighting has killed more than 800 people — including at least 732 Lebanese and 122 Israelis.

After nightfall, there were some signs of troop movement on the Israel-Lebanon border. Battle-ready soldiers carrying heavy backpacks marched near the border as tanks assembled nearby. In south Lebanon, there were no reports of increased troop activity. Israeli officials gave conflicting assessments on whether a wider campaign was under way.

More than 10,000 Israeli troops are already fighting Hezbollah guerrillas in south Lebanon. In the new phase, Israeli forces would push toward Lebanon's Litani River, some 18 miles from the Israel-Lebanon border, attempting to capture more than twice as much territory as they hold now.

Olmert has faced growing criticism at home for the army's inability to halt the rocket barrages; Hezbollah has fired more than 3,500 rockets in the monthlong war. Polls also indicated that his initially approval rating, high at the start of the war, was slipping.

Commentators have suggested Olmert's political career was at stake, and that he might even be forced to step down. Many Israelis believe defeating Hezbollah is essential for their country's long-term security.

In Lebanon, Israeli airstrikes pounded south Beirut and border crossings to Syria, killing at least 15 people as ground fighting picked up intensity in the south of the country.

In the Bekaa Valley, an Israeli drone fired missiles into a convoy of refugees fleeing attacks in the southern town of Marjayoun, killing at least six people and wounding 16 others, an Associated Press photographer said.

The Israeli military said it had no knowledge of the incident. The army noted that it had imposed a travel ban on south Lebanon, and had received no request to coordinate a convoy in that area.

Throughout the day, civilians had been fleeing fighting in the Christian town of Marjayoun in long convoys after Israeli forces entered earlier this week.

Lutfallah Daher, the photographer, was with the convoy when it was hit near the town of Chtaura, about 30 miles north of the Litani River. Israel had warned it would attack any vehicle on roads south of the Litani, assuming it was carrying Hezbollah weapons or fighters.

Daher said the convoy consisted of more than 600 civilian vehicles and others carrying a detachment of 350 Lebanese soldiers and police when it left the area around Marjayoun. He said very few of the vehicles had left the convoy when it was hit.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2006israelwar; appeasement; appeaser; ceasefire; ehudolmer; ehudolmert; idf; israel; lebanon; olmert; peaceinourtime; un; unres1701
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-273 next last
To: Alouette

Prayers. It's what we have. Otherwise Israel has nothing at all.


181 posted on 08/11/2006 5:21:23 PM PDT by timsbella (Mark Steyn for Prime Minister of Canada! (Steve's won my vote in the meantime))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Mr.Smorch; All

If I was an IDF soldier right now,I would feel a little betrayed that my leader caved to the enemy.


182 posted on 08/11/2006 5:22:44 PM PDT by garbageseeker ("The best form of defense is attack." -Karl Philippe Gottfried von Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
You are right. Once again the terrorists win and the political leaders of the West show they have no stomach for a fight.

More good soldiers fighting with their hands tied behind their back have died mostly in vain.

Hezbollah,the Lebanese,Hamas, the PLO,Iraqi terrorists, Syria and Iran will be cheering their victory in the streets and greatly encourage to continue their fight.

The Terrorists will rearm, regroup continue the attacks. and the force if any is put in place will only provide protection and support for the terrorists as they have for the last forty years.

Once again Bush and the Western Politicians [France] will send their friends who are chomping at the bits to fill their pockets with taxpayer dollars [Most of which will be U.S.]to rebuild this terrorists rat hold of people who hate us just like Iraq.

The only ones who will benefit from it will be the War profiters,politicians and the terrorists.

They will get rich and the innocent civilians and the soldiers will supply the blood, sweat and tears.

Damn them all that profit from the shedding of innocent blood.

183 posted on 08/11/2006 5:26:44 PM PDT by mississippi red-neck (You will never win the war on terrorism by fighting it in Iraq and funding it in the West Bank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FredTownWard

The scuttle in the beltway is that this is the Defense Minister's and Olmerts decision. Benni needs to step up and negotiate new emergency elections.

LLS


184 posted on 08/11/2006 5:27:40 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

In the 1940's the country of Israel was created to house the millions of displaced Jews that no country would take in. When Iran, Syria, Lebanon et al have wiped out Israel, what countries are going to take in the survivors?


185 posted on 08/11/2006 5:31:50 PM PDT by hardworking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill

Don't think for a minute that "this was Israel's" decision. Earlier in the day, on Fox, it was reported that GW and Olmert had their first direct discussion since "thie" began. Sure smells like "we" pulled the plug on Israel.
_____________________
I don't quite buy this - we are staying the course in Iraq - We are all armchair quarterbacks right now. I'm not a big fan of Condi - I do believe Bush is the biggest defender of Israel perhaps on the planet. He wouldn't slit their throats.


186 posted on 08/11/2006 5:31:58 PM PDT by justche (If you're afraid of the future, then get out of the way, stand aside. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
I agree. Convene a vote of "no confidence" against Olmert. He blew the chance to destroy Hezbollah.
187 posted on 08/11/2006 5:32:56 PM PDT by garbageseeker ("The best form of defense is attack." -Karl Philippe Gottfried von Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider

Political correctness, and timidity in the face of evil will kill us all unless we change and quickly.

We had better all start thinking seriously about getting ourselves some prayer rugs, because our 'leadership' is selling us down the river faster than we can even imagine.


188 posted on 08/11/2006 5:33:39 PM PDT by hardworking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: forYourChildrenVote4Bush

I too thought of Jimmah C-ah-r-ter. You are absolutely right.


189 posted on 08/11/2006 5:35:12 PM PDT by hardworking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: hardworking
When Iran, Syria, Lebanon et al have wiped out Israel, what countries are going to take in the survivors?

I am sure the United States and Britain would. But we should not be thinking about those things. However, we should be giving Israel the military hardware to defeat her enemies to prevent that from happening.
190 posted on 08/11/2006 5:36:37 PM PDT by garbageseeker ("The best form of defense is attack." -Karl Philippe Gottfried von Clausewitz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

I agree we send our boys excuse me MEN to get killed in Iraq/Afghanistan while we give the enemy a break nearby...Makes no sense


191 posted on 08/11/2006 5:37:07 PM PDT by mel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Made in USA

Get over this Bibi crap. He was a lousy, ineffective PM who would be co-opted by US State just like every other Israeli "leader".


192 posted on 08/11/2006 5:39:42 PM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog

Just an honest question, what made you change your mind since your posts in:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1672802/posts

You used to be (ahem!) VERY pro-Rice.

Yet...

Condi Rice has not changed since then, she's been steadfast in her actions to support Jew-killer terrorists. HAMAS, Hizbollah, PA, PLO, Fatah, Islamic Jihad... have all benefited from her actions.

Although, HAMAS and Hizbollah have benefited the most.


193 posted on 08/11/2006 5:41:24 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (I criticize everyone... and then breath some radioactive fire and stomp on things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
I don't have a good answer.

I might have to come to grips with the knowledge that I can possibly be wrong. *gulp*

I am not ready to accept that conclusion yet, but I am close, and if it comes to that, I don't have enough liquor in my home at this time.
194 posted on 08/11/2006 5:44:07 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

Amen!

LLS


195 posted on 08/11/2006 5:45:27 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: garbageseeker

I am sure the United States and Britain would. But we should not be thinking about those things. However, we should be giving Israel the military hardware to defeat her enemies to prevent that from happening.
_____________________________________________________
I am afraid Israel will not exist for much longer. It is a dark hour for Israel.


196 posted on 08/11/2006 5:48:14 PM PDT by racing fan (Go Team Israel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
I blame Bush who instructed Rice and Bolton to ruin a chance for Israel to strike a crushing blow on the war on terror. He lost me. Where in the hell did he go. The Republican party is done and we will have suffered hard.
You wrote the above in your post 21 at 0610 PM. That is what I read and was replying to. So, when you asked "Who said it was Bush's fault.", the answer is you did. Pardon me if I misread it.
197 posted on 08/11/2006 5:48:23 PM PDT by ekwd (Murphy's Law Has Not Been Repealed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Neophyte

There really needs to be a litmus test for office-seekers in the western world.

If a potential candidate cannot be shown to work for the strengthening of their own country (economic/military), they should be barred from seeking office.

Sometimes... (sometimes? actually, most times) I think that Heinlein had it right in his book 'Starship Troopers'.

That the only people that should be allowed to vote or run for office are those that have proven themselves by serving in the military.

IE - serving in the military showing that you'd be willing to die to protect your country.

(although, Olmert is a good example of how that wouldn't always work)


198 posted on 08/11/2006 5:49:28 PM PDT by gogogodzilla (I criticize everyone... and then breath some radioactive fire and stomp on things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
Sure smells like "we" pulled the plug on Israel.

Yep--Israel can't exist without US support so we call the shots and it sure seems that that is what Bush did
199 posted on 08/11/2006 5:49:46 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: gogogodzilla
she's been steadfast in her actions to support Jew-killer terrorists.

For the record, I think that's going a bit too far in your assessment of Rice.

200 posted on 08/11/2006 5:49:49 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 261-273 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson