Posted on 08/11/2006 6:36:37 AM PDT by Agent Smith
Radical Islam doesn't tolerate other religions. American Muslims, however, do and seem to have no problem with that particular practice.
All religions SHOULD be treated equally by the government. It is what has prevented any hint of a theocracy in this country, and for that I am extremely grateful.
As for your listing of crimes committed by Muslims, I could list crimes committed by Christians of equal horror.
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make.
I suspect that you can't accept the fact that Mohammedanism is inherently militant because you're an Americanist at heart.
Screaming "heresy" because I don't want to drive Muslim American citizens out of the country?
Where does this Americanism say that?
Here we disagree. My check is the magisterium and the Pope. They define Catholicism, not us.
Yes, but the Magisterium is reasonable! Faith and reason are complementary, not antithetical, since they are both gifts from the same God.
I sometimes have problems accepting the 'turn the other cheek' notion as reasonable, but if I don't accept it overall, I am no Catholic, and probably not even a good Christian.
The notion must be understood properly. We are not to be doormats, since Jesus also told us:
Luke 22:36He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.
Wrong. Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country, allows Christian worship [Muslim pop: 201 million]; so does India [Muslim pop. 144 million], Pakistan [Muslim pop. 140 million], Egypt [Muslim pop. 65 million], Bangladesh [Muslim pop. 115 million], Nigeria [Muslim pop: 95 million} and Turkey [66 million]. Most of the other countries in the world where Muslims live, including the US and Europe, allow the practice of Christianity. In point of fact the vast majority of Muslims [1.2 billion total] live in countries where Christian worship is allowed.
The practice of the Jewish religion is another matter.
If only Hitler had thought to call his Nazism a religion.
He'd have won.
Colonial literature and early American newspapers, were full of references to the "Turk" and the remorseless "Mohometan." Defending the republic against the turbaned zealots would have been something like the modern prohibition against using Nazis in interenet flame wars like this one. The evil was assumed. None of them could have imagined the sort of historical ignorance that would be required to allow for unrestrained Islamic immigration to "these united states."
It seems to be the aim of most people on this thread.
It's a public school that is comprised of about 90% Arab Moslem students. Nothing disingenuous about that. The entire football team for most of the past several years has been Arabic. There was a piece on one of the networks after 9/11 talking about what it was like to be an all Arabic/Moslem football team.
So you are admitting "Christian AND Jewish" worship is illegal in the vast majority of Muslim states? It's a little Boolean quiz for you.
Furthermore: Identify one religion in the modern era that has a very sizable percentage of devotees as practicioners of random and terroristic violence.
And the balance of the devotees, silent about the former.
The government lies all the time, you are right about that. but I think that if there were to be a push to strip us of constitutional protections in the wind then it would have happened in early 2002 or early 2005. You should see the power the government has in these areas in France.
You won't be happy until the nuke actually goes off in Portland, will ya?
And yet, the Constitution is silent on the subject. I guess it isn't just the Leftists who believe in a "living document".
I presume you also accept Jefferson's to the Danbury Baptists as the intent of a Founder. One must be intellectually consistent, after all.
If the Founders intended Islam to be exempted from the Constitutional protections afforded every other religion, they should have said so. They, in their wisdom, did not.
I used to be on their side.
Then I realized it is a fight for SURVIVAL.
After we survive, we can make nice again. Kinda like after WWII
You are asserting that someone who simply holds American citizenship is guaranteed to be civilized. Would that it were so.
You won't be happy until the nuke actually goes off in Portland, will ya?
That has nothing to do with the mass deportation of millions of natural-born American citizens just because they don't share your religion.
A police state is a safer state. Franklin called it at the beginning - be careful what trades you're willing to make for that security.
I'm sorry, Ben. Maybe we can't keep it.
we can make nice again
It saddens me that respect for the Constitution is denigrated as "making nice."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.