To: Sleeping Freeper
Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat.
4 posted on
08/10/2006 10:23:13 AM PDT by
saganite
(Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
To: saganite
11 posted on
08/10/2006 10:25:07 AM PDT by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: saganite
Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat. Makes sense.
To: saganite
Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat. Exactly my thought. I'm wondering if this was done by the authorities on purpose at this point in time either because of a tip or as a 'test' (in case they got a tip).
18 posted on
08/10/2006 10:26:31 AM PDT by
DoctorMichael
(A wall first. A wall now.)
To: saganite
We were working outside yesterday. Our very sophisticated equipment went crazy. We took out the second machine. That went crazy too. Wouldn't pick up the signal.
Then one of the radios went nuts and blew its program.
I commented: "What the hell is going on"? Are we getting sabotaged by the satellites?
We'll check out the instruments Monday!!
28 posted on
08/10/2006 10:28:45 AM PDT by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: saganite; Hydroshock; Sleeping Freeper; presidio9
It smacks of something bad. My hubs works for the company that went in and augmented signals after 9/11 to look for people trapped in the rubble. Someone must've taken out a tower to do this...but why?
Careful out there!
34 posted on
08/10/2006 10:29:57 AM PDT by
Froufrou
To: saganite
46 posted on
08/10/2006 10:34:19 AM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Democrats - The reason we need term limits)
To: saganite
"Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat."
That was my first thought, too.
48 posted on
08/10/2006 10:35:25 AM PDT by
divine_moment_of_facts
("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
To: saganite
Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat.
--------------------------------------------
I just spoke via cell to my wife on her cell. I am in Nassau, less than 1/2 mile from Queens and she is in Elmhurst, Queens, less than three miles from LGA. Cell service isn't defined as neatly as an electric grid. One can stand on the North Shore of LI and get service from a tower in Connecticut and service in Queens will be covered by sites in Nassau, the Bronx, Brooklyn and Manhattan at the least.
65 posted on
08/10/2006 10:41:17 AM PDT by
wtc911
(You can't get there from here)
To: saganite
To: saganite
Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat. Nothing to see here, move along...™
117 posted on
08/10/2006 11:57:40 AM PDT by
null and void
(A's hire A's, B's hire C's. -- Donald Rumsfeld,)
To: saganite
Unfortunately you could trigger the mobile to set the bomb off if no call was recieved for more than 30 minutes.
To: saganite
Since cellphones are triggering devices for bombs it would make sense to shut down service in the vicinity of an airport if there was a suspected threat. "Shut down the grid!" --Die Hard
126 posted on
08/10/2006 12:09:08 PM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson