>>>>'They import foetuses from poverty stricken countries to treat vain Western women'
Well, let's see...HRC still has two years before she runs for President..
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: .cnI redruM
What a sad life these women must lead.
To: .cnI redruM
Seems a bit canabalistic.
To: .cnI redruM
In America, President Bush has denounced stem- cell therapy even for medical purposes as 'godless', vetoing any public funding, This is an outright lie!
Bush vetoed embryonic stem cell funding, adult and umbilical funding is not affected.
Nor does this article acknowledge that the ONLY successes from stem cell research are those that DON'T involve embryos.
5 posted on
08/07/2006 7:12:42 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: .cnI redruM
Brings the South Park elementary school nurse to mind.
To: .cnI redruM
9 posted on
08/07/2006 7:20:39 AM PDT by
mrs. a
(It's a short life but a merry one...)
To: .cnI redruM
In America, President Bush has denounced stem- cell therapy even for medical purposes as 'godless', vetoing any public funding, ***************
Not true. He denounced embryonic stem cell therapy. The media can never seem to get it right.
11 posted on
08/07/2006 7:22:14 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: .cnI redruM
No side effects?
![](http://realitytv.about.com/library/images/williamhung.jpg)
12 posted on
08/07/2006 7:22:22 AM PDT by
ikka
To: .cnI redruM
Scientific illiteracy of this magnitude is amazing to behold.
15 posted on
08/07/2006 7:23:17 AM PDT by
Jim Noble
(I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit - it's the only way to be sure.)
To: .cnI redruM
16 posted on
08/07/2006 7:27:08 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: .cnI redruM
OMG.
The West is building up a judgment that will be terrible.
22 posted on
08/07/2006 7:44:11 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: .cnI redruM
What an incredibly dishonest article.
While the ethics (to say the leats) of something like this are questionable, it does not involve babies or killing babies.
I'm sure worse exists in this world using aborted fetuses as well.
Vampirism has become a dominant paradigm in the last few years.
25 posted on
08/07/2006 8:06:37 AM PDT by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: .cnI redruM
President Bush has denounced stem- cell therapy even for medical purposes as 'godless' He denounces therapies using stem cells taken from aborted babies, not umbilical cords.
29 posted on
08/07/2006 8:16:54 AM PDT by
Aquinasfan
(When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
To: .cnI redruM
sounds like a Smallville episode only with criminals to evil for network television:
Shallow teen beauty uses green rocks to grow anti-aging tissue in a vain attempt to preserve fading beauty.
Shallow teen beauty kills innocent babies to obtain anti-aging tissue in a vain attempt to preserve fading beauty.
To: .cnI redruM
The concept of medical and scientific ethics has been discarded. No longer is there any restraint, Dr Frankenstein is free to do whatever he pleases.
Not just personal barbarism, with their own colleagues approval, but a competition for who can violate the most basic tenets of existence.
Being a "mad scientist" is no longer at the extreme end of the the bad side of the dichotomy of acceptable and unacceptable medical and scientific behavior. It is a degree of scale.
"How far will you go?", is no longer a measure of insanity, but of fortitude. Of will. The lesser scientist refuses to do, refuses to violate, corrupt and destroy.
In truth, Dr Frankenstein is a lesser light, because he was horrified with his creation. Were his accomplishment to be created today, not only would he be happy and lauded, but he would be deluged with money for even more abominable experiments. Hundreds of scientists across the world would seek to replicate and improve his work, patenting whatever derivations they could discover.
Because "the monster" would be patentable, and patented. It would not be a soulless hulk, but a slave. Mass produced as intelligent organ donors and experimental surgery subjects. Conscripted, with modification, as expendable warriors. Fed narcotics and modified for a few years' use before being put down.
Perhaps its DNA would be spliced with animals, to create a more destructive and violent creature. Its brain wired with electrodes to better control its actions. Make it a giant or to look like a human.
Why not use them as assassins and suicide bombers? To perform ethnic cleansing?
These are no longer the ideas of horror movie scriptwriters. They are the dreams and imaginings of doctors and scientists who want to bring such things, and a million others, into reality.
Because if we don't do it, someone else will. And we will lose our corporate profits and government grants. We are, after all, a research university. Umbrella Corporation.
It sounds like a rant, but there really is no limit to monstrosity, the absence of ethics, the unwillingness, not just to reject the unacceptable in your own work, but to stand against those without any grace or humanity.
"We can destroy the world, but we're working hard to be able to destroy the world even better!"
To: .cnI redruM
Devouring dead children is the 'Fountain of Youth'.
To: .cnI redruM
HEADSPINNINGLY UNREAL. Talking pigs and horses on a farm make more sense....
40 posted on
08/07/2006 9:20:31 AM PDT by
gobucks
(Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
To: .cnI redruM
It must be so bitter for some women to get old and realize that men think chubby teenager girls are beautiful.
The women in the article remind me of the wicked queen from Snow White.
43 posted on
08/07/2006 10:40:30 AM PDT by
after dark
('Tis now the very witching time of night;)
To: .cnI redruM
Seriously, I want to ask Andrea what would possess her to write an article about a subject on which she obviously does not have even the slightest grasp on the most basic level.
There is no moral conflict in using stem cells gathered from umbilical cords. You can eat an umbilical cord sandwich if you like, or wear an umbilical cord hat if that's your fancy. It's gross, but you're not hurting anybody else.
45 posted on
08/07/2006 11:12:58 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: .cnI redruM
"Oh, no - we'd NEVER kill babies on purpose just to get their cells! It would never come to THAT!" I predict farms in the U.S. in 15-20 years.
To: .cnI redruM
I'll bet she has more plastic on her front end than a 99 Neon.
53 posted on
08/07/2006 2:06:43 PM PDT by
BigCinBigD
(Merry Christmas!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson