Posted on 08/05/2006 9:43:28 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK
With its soaring granite walls and spouting waterfalls, Yosemite's Hetch Hetchy Valley was described by conservationist John Muir as "a grand landscape garden, one of Nature's rarest and most precious mountain temples."
Much of the glacially carved valley now lies under 300 feet of water. It was dammed and flooded more than 80 years ago to supply drinking water and hydropower to the San Francisco Bay area.
For years, environmentalists have advocated draining the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir and returning the valley to its original splendor, while opponents say that would cost a bundle at a time when California needs all the water and electricity it can get.
A recent study by the state Department of Water Resources has intensified the debate.
The report found that the project was "technically feasible" and backers of the dismantling cheered. But opponents pounced on the estimated price tag of $3 billion to $10 billion a figure supporters dispute as inflated.
Conservationists see an opportunity to restore what Muir called a "wonderfully exact counterpart" to Yosemite Valley, the national park's most famous attraction, known for towering granite monuments like El Capitan and Half Dome.
They say it's possible to dismantle the O'Shaughnessy Dam, replace the lost water storage downstream on the Tuolumne River and find other sources of clean electricity.
"We could create a better Yosemite Valley," said Spreck Rosecranz, an analyst for the conservation group Environmental Defense, looking out over the serene reservoir behind the 312-foot concrete dam. "Restoring Hetch Hetchy would allow us to recreate the natural experience as it should be and once was."
But the campaign faces stiff resistance. Opponents say the project would compromise the Bay Area's water supply and California has more pressing infrastructure needs. What's more, they say, visitors today can still enjoy the 7-mile-long reservoir and its dramatic landscape.
Two state Assembly members Democrats Lois Wolk and Joe Canciamilla are looking for ways to fund more in-depth studies.
"We need to move forward with the next level of analysis," Canciamilla said. "This is a unique part of California. Before we say 'No, we can't do it,' we should have a real understanding of what it would take to potentially restore the valley."
But officials in San Francisco, including Mayor Gavin Newsom and the Public Utilities Commission that manages the Hetch Hetchy water system, remain strongly opposed.
Susan Leal, the commission's general manager, said California needs more water storage and electricity, not less, given the state's growing population and predictions that global warming could lead to more droughts and melting snowpack.
"The proposal doesn't make sense," Leal said. "I think it's a real misplaced priority."
Restoring Hetch Hetchy also would require Washington's backing since Yosemite is a national park, but the idea has gotten little support from federal lawmakers.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a former San Francisco mayor, said the study confirmed the project is "unwarranted and the cost is indefensible, particularly given the tremendous infrastructure needs facing our state."
An earlier generation of conservationists fought the damming of Hetch Hetchy. Muir led the opposition in one of the country's first major environmental battles a struggle that transformed the Sierra Club into a political force.
The Sierra Club founder was reportedly heartbroken when President Wilson signed the 1913 Raker Act allowing San Francisco, which was seeking a stable source of water and electricity after the 1906 earthquake, to build the reservoir. Muir died a year later, and the dam was completed in 1923.
"It's a piece of unfinished work that John Muir left to his heirs," said Bruce Hamilton, the Sierra Club's conservation director. "We realize this is a campaign that will take a long time because there is such fierce political opposition to it."
In 1988, President Reagan's interior secretary, Don Hodel, ordered the first government study into restoring Hetch Hetchy as a way to relieve overcrowding in neighboring Yosemite Valley, which draws more than 3 million visitors each year.
"The park is a million acres, but Yosemite Valley, where everyone wants to go, is 5,400 acres," said Hodel, who now runs a consulting firm in Colorado. "It's a heck of a good idea. The national parks are the crown jewels of this country, and we've got one with an incredible valley that has been flooded."
That federal study found it was possible to restore the valley, but the idea ran into fierce opposition from San Francisco and other water interests.
Hetch Hetchy Valley now attracts more than 50,000 visitors a year who can walk across the O'Shaughnessy Dam, hike around the reservoir and get away from the throngs who clog Yosemite Valley's roads and campgrounds.
Deborah Huber, a retired Colorado teacher who visited Hetch Hetchy in July with her husband and friends, didn't see a problem with the reservoir.
"I think it's beautiful with the lake, but I bet it was beautiful without it," Huber said, standing on the giant dam. "(But) if it was restored to something like Yosemite Valley, it would be overcrowded, too."
The latest push for restoration began in 2001 when San Francisco began planning its $4.3 billion upgrade of the Hetch Hetchy system, which delivers some of the country's highest quality drinking water to 2.4 million residents of San Francisco and about 30 other Bay Area cities.
A 2003 study by the University California, Davis, and a 2004 report by Environmental Defense each argued that it was possible to drain the reservoir and replace most of the water storage capacity with expanded reservoirs downstream. Water transfers and purchases from other districts would make up the difference. They project that native grasses, plants, trees and animals would return to the valley floor within several years.
Those studies and a series of Pulitzer Prize-winning editorials by the Sacramento Bee prompted Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to order the state Department of Water Resources to review the previous restoration studies.
The state report concluded that more extensive studies were needed to get a better cost estimate, but any further exploration must involve local, state and federal agencies and stakeholders.
Despite the opposition, environmentalists insist their campaign is slowly gaining momentum as more people learn about Hetch Hetchy and the opportunity to restore it.
"The genie is out of the bottle," said Ron Good, who heads the advocacy group Restore Hetch Hetchy. "The American people have awakened to the fact that Hetchy Hetchy is available to us as it should be."
___
On the Net:
Restore Hetch Hetchy: http://www.hetchhetchy.org/
Environmental Defense: http://www.environmentaldefense.org/hetchhetchy/index.cfm
San Francisco Public Utilities Commission: http://www.sfwater.org/
Yosemite National Park: http://www.nps.gov/yose/
The nutcases continue to run Taxifornia.
Take away usage of water for pools and lawns in CA, and quit wasting what they have. It is time that they learned how to convert sea water to potable, and quit draining the rivers of the west. A few years ago the Californian assembly put forth a plan to divert the Columbia river for their usage. I suppose a pipeline would have been built. As for me, let the place dry up, and return to the splendor of yesteryear. It already is plum full of parasites, now would be as good a time as any to dry up the supply of money and water.
Sure, they will loose a little hydro-power (also benefiting only liberals), but they can put a few windmills up in their city to replace that.
-----
The state SHOULD be building nuke plants for electric power. Far more power, which the state needs, and at a much lower cost than any other method. But we all know who is controlling the suppression of nuke generating plants...and the beat goes on.
I wish it were just taxifornia. Leftists seem to get their folks out in massive numbers. We don't. Therefore our intrests lose.
I won't be surprised to see them win this issue. I think they are dead wrong.
They are dirt-worshipers.
I have been to Hetch-Hetchy, and both the lake and the dam are beautiful. The mountains rise from and reflect on the lake like a Chinese painting.
I can't imagine it would be any prettier if the valley bottom was full of tourists like Yosimite.
These people also would prefer other reservoirs, like the weirdly beautiful Don Pedro, to be the dust bowls they used to be.
This is both practical an aesthetic insanity.
Hetch-Hetchy water and power go to people from the central valley to San Jose and up the whole SF Penninsula. The power is actually used mainly by central valley districts.
A very big and important chunk of the Califoria economy depends on this.
Avoid thinking in rhetorical terms, that is the defining characteristic of the liberals, and is why they are always wrong. Conservatives use analysis and perspective.
Hetch-Hetchy is California water, from the California side of the Sierra watersheds.
Most CA water by far is used for agriculture, not residential, even for lawns and pools. The real water soakers are Central valley farmers. They have a very high water use/economic benefit ratio.
Someone should have Hetch-hetchy dam named a state landmark and a historic building.
It really is a work of art and an amazing feat of engineering. I have seen the construction plans and pictures of the building project.
Dumb totally dumb.
I agree, that's why we really need to think this through.
Not one drop of water would be unavailable for use. It is simply picked up a little ways downstream, outside of the park boundary. Don't listen to liberal claptrap about the water being wasted.
It's true, a little power generation would be lost but this can easily be made up with other energy sources. Right now liberal kooks in SF get the benefit of this very low cost hydro power. Let then put their money where their mouth is and develop alternative sources of energy on SF land. Why should the whole country be deprived of Hetch Hetchy Valley just so folks in the Castro can save a few pennies to heat their bath houses?
The delicious irony of Hetch Hetchy was not lost on the Reagan administration. Liberal Dems are desecrating a natural wonder so they can have cheap water and power. Tearing down O'Shaughnessy Dam is not a liberal idea. Reagan's Interior Secretary first proposed it.
(Go Israel, Go! Slap 'Em Down Hezbullies.)
It wasn't liberals who built it or paid for it. SF was a Republican town then, and the actual designers and builders were no liberals.
It would be an insult to their memory to tear it down. The present residents of San Francisco are for the most part interlopers unrelated to their more worthy predecessors.
The actual power generation is for the direct benefit of central valley users, not liberals. The replacement power generation would require transmission systems changes in the valley, not in San Francisco, and probably the alternative power would have to be built in or near the valley to comply with CPUC requirements. SF just gets electricity from PG&E.
It is California water on the east side of the Sierra too, even though most living on the west side of the range think we are in Nevada (I wish we were). Water from the Eastern High Sierra goes to Los Angeles.
THAT is legitimate water usage, money makin and waterin crops. I remember there was some guy in the 90's, that said he had found a huge aquifer in Nevada, and if the state would cut him in for a percentage of the profit, he would tell them where to dig. They told him where to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.