Skip to comments.
State Court Rules Miller Genuine Draft Is Actually Beer
NBC10.com ^
| 8/2/06
Posted on 08/02/2006 8:32:49 PM PDT by LdSentinal
READING, Pa. -- A judge who dismissed charges against a man accused of buying a case of beer for a 17-year-old, saying prosecutors failed to prove Miller Genuine Draft was an alcoholic beverage, was mistaken, state Superior Court ruled.
"This finding was incorrect,'' said the Superior Court ruling in the case against Gregg R. Hartman, 44, of Kutztown.
State police had charged Hartman with furnishing liquor to minors. Shawn Putnam, 17, had testified that Hartman bought him a case of Miller Genuine Draft on Jan 7, 2004, at Duffer's Beer Distributor in Kutztown, and Putnam drank five beers within 15 minutes in the car while Hartman was driving around.
Berks County Judge Jeffrey K. Sprecher dismissed the charge, saying the prosecution failed to provide the state Liquor Control Board's list of beers to prove the beverage was beer. "It's equally plausible that the defendant purchased a nonalcoholic beverage with a flavor similar to beer,'' he had ruled.
But the Superior Court judges wrote, "Putnam's testimony was more than enough to establish that the beverage he was drinking was a malt or brewed beverage.''
Assistant District Attorney Douglas J. Waltman Jr. said the case would be listed for trial.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alcohol; beer; guessworkinblackrobe; judiciary; miller; pennsylvania; ruling; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: LdSentinal
2
posted on
08/02/2006 8:33:57 PM PDT
by
AmishDude
(The Constitution: It ain't long, it ain't complicated and it don't take a genius to figure it out.)
To: LdSentinal
This is reason number one why judges should never be lawyers.
3
posted on
08/02/2006 8:36:31 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
To: LdSentinal
Before I quit drinking, Miller Light Draft was my regular brew at my regular pub.
(Because they had a regular special - A pint for $2.)
Glad I quit though.
4
posted on
08/02/2006 8:37:41 PM PDT
by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: LdSentinal
Still, it's good for MGD to get that cleared up.
5
posted on
08/02/2006 8:37:44 PM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: LdSentinal
6
posted on
08/02/2006 8:39:03 PM PDT
by
pissant
To: LdSentinal
Right argument, wrong beer. If it had been a Schlitz the guy may have had a chance.
There is a reason there was a bull on the can.
7
posted on
08/02/2006 8:39:56 PM PDT
by
gov_bean_ counter
(There are only a few absolute truths in life, everything else is just an opinion.)
To: LdSentinal
The judges name is
Sprecher. Maybe he just knew that Miller isnt really beer.
8
posted on
08/02/2006 8:40:24 PM PDT
by
gnarledmaw
(I traded freedom for security and all I got were these damned shackles.)
To: LdSentinal
State Court Rules Miller Genuine Draft Is Actually Beer WOW! Coulda fooled me. Sure doesn't taste like beer.
Lucky for the brewery that they got this ruling to prove it is.
Courts are corrupting everything.
9
posted on
08/02/2006 8:44:22 PM PDT
by
capt. norm
(Bumper Sticker: Honk if you've never seen an Uzi shoot from a car window.)
To: LdSentinal
Hmm.. Sounds like an activist appeals court to me. The judge made a simple finding of fact that any similarly situated reasonable person might very well make...
10
posted on
08/02/2006 8:45:46 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
("..I do things for political expediency.." - Sen. John McCain on FOX News)
To: LdSentinal
It's a language problem. In
Kutzeschtettel the word for "beer" is "Yuengling Lager" or just "lager".
To: LdSentinal
Glad to see our courts are addressing impt matters /sarcasm
12
posted on
08/02/2006 8:53:03 PM PDT
by
DollyCali
(Don't tell GOD how big your storm is -- Tell the storm how B-I-G your God is!)
To: LdSentinal
A judge who dismissed charges against a man accused of buying a case of beer for a 17-year-old, saying prosecutors failed to prove Miller Genuine Draft was an alcoholic beverage, was mistaken, state Superior Court ruled. Who knew!
13
posted on
08/02/2006 8:53:18 PM PDT
by
teletech
(Friends don't let friends vote DemocRAT)
To: LdSentinal
Easy mistake for the judge to have made. It certainly MGD certainly tastes more like water than beer.
14
posted on
08/02/2006 8:54:53 PM PDT
by
Zeroisanumber
(Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
To: LdSentinal
Was Bill Clinton the defense attorney?
I thought he had been disbarred.
15
posted on
08/02/2006 8:55:34 PM PDT
by
HIDEK6
To: AntiGuv
Yes, I thought judges were reluctant to overturn facts decided by other judges. Hmmm...this particular judge must have had some expert knowledge, I'll bet...
To: LdSentinal
So basically, Sprecher said Hartman furnished Putnam at Duffer's in Kutztown. Me? I'm disappointed by the lack of Homer Simpson jokes. Duffer's?
To: gnarledmaw
That's exactly what I thought when I read the name of the judge.
To: LdSentinal
Its' Raining Beer....A cloudburst. :D
19
posted on
08/02/2006 9:12:19 PM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just b/c your paranoid; Doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you. :)
To: LdSentinal
Assistant District Attorney Douglas J. Waltman Jr. said the case would be listed for trial. Someone ought to ask why a 44-year old man is not only buying beer for a 17-year-old boy, but driving him around while he drinks it. Sounds like a possible John Wayne Gacy at the wheel.
20
posted on
08/02/2006 9:12:25 PM PDT
by
lakey
(Blithering idiots refer to the United States as a democracy!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson