To: SirLinksalot
2 posted on
07/17/2006 9:52:28 AM PDT by
dangerdoc
(dangerdoc (not actually dangerous any more))
To: SirLinksalot
Man, I gotta go out in the garage and poke around until I find that relic of the True Cross. I bet I could get a few bucks for that baby on E-Bay!
3 posted on
07/17/2006 10:11:11 AM PDT by
Kenton
To: SunkenCiv; blam
To: SirLinksalot
Is this a new low for religious reporting or am I missing something?
...that included evangelical apologist Josh McDowell...
7 posted on
07/17/2006 10:20:26 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Al Qaeda / Taliban operatives: Read the NY Times, for daily up to the minute security threat tips.)
To: SirLinksalot
In fact, the remains of the Ark are buried in Secaucus, New Jersey, just above the ruins of Atlantis. We know this because both have been 'located' everywhere else in the world and not found there.
8 posted on
07/17/2006 10:29:12 AM PDT by
Grut
from the site:
Map location:
56-5F-6F-6E-7E
Site location:
N39/42/59.7 E44/17/29.3
11 posted on
07/17/2006 10:39:26 AM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SirLinksalot
Wow, they climbed a mountain and discovered sedimentary rock.
Who'd a thunk it?
12 posted on
07/17/2006 10:52:40 AM PDT by
TomB
("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
To: SirLinksalot
yes, this is all very interesting, but it still doesn't tell us what the heck a "cubit" is.
16 posted on
07/17/2006 11:25:06 AM PDT by
Robwin
To: SirLinksalot
19 posted on
07/17/2006 11:33:31 AM PDT by
griffin
(Love Jesus, No Fear!)
To: SirLinksalot
20 posted on
07/17/2006 11:33:31 AM PDT by
griffin
(Love Jesus, No Fear!)
To: SirLinksalot
With the title 'flood of claims' I was expecting to see news that some ambulance chasing lawyer was suing Lloyds of London for an insurance payout.
27 posted on
07/17/2006 11:47:46 AM PDT by
qlangley
To: SirLinksalot
For years people have scoffed based on the idea of "2X2 of every animal..." and squeezing them all into an ark.
Now we have competing claims to have found "the ark".
Wouldn't it be a hoot if it turned out that Noah WAS part of a fleet as someone joked in a FR response to the latest find?
[That and the recognition of a regional rather than worldwide flood would also fit the "don't take the bible as literal fact" debate because it could be true but not specifically accurate.]
28 posted on
07/17/2006 11:59:20 AM PDT by
norton
To: SirLinksalot
These guys are wasting their time. Noah's Ark, if it still exists, will not be found. They will never find 100% conclusive proof of its existence.
If they could provide absolute proof in the existence of Noah's Ark, that would mean that not only is the bible correct about the great flood, but also about the existence of God. God doesn't want people to believe in Him because they know His existence is a FACT. God wants people to believe in Him because of FAITH.
When the time comes for people to start believing in Him because His existence is a verifiable fact, those that have had faith based belief in Him will be long gone from this world.
36 posted on
07/17/2006 1:11:02 PM PDT by
JavaTheHutt
(I'm JavaTheHutt, and I approve of this message.)
To: SirLinksalot
I read the book on Ron Wyatt's Ark. Pretty convincing. I
could be wrong but I believe it is the true Ark of Noah.
41 posted on
07/17/2006 4:10:39 PM PDT by
11B40
(times change, people don't)
45 posted on
07/21/2006 9:36:22 AM PDT by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson