Skip to comments.
Senator's gay bashing decried
Cincinnati Post ^
| 15 July 2006
| Stephenie Steitzer
Posted on 07/15/2006 10:18:20 AM PDT by Deadeye Division
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
To: Deadeye Division
Why do Republicans apologize for telling the truth?
2
posted on
07/15/2006 10:21:38 AM PDT
by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
To: nonliberal
He's right about "The decision makes the university the first public college in the state to extend benefits to domestic partners.", but that gets lost by using the term he used.
Non-married couples and gays getting benefits reserved for married people is ridiculous.
To: nonliberal
QUEER: Deviating from the expected or normal; strange: a queer situation.
The truth hurts, but homosexuals are, by definition, queer. Being gay is not normal. Even if they ultimately prove it's caused by genetics, it would be no different than any other genetic abnormality, and scientists would look for a cure.
NORMAL: The usual or expected state, form, amount, or degree.
To: Deadeye Division
The queers call themselves queers. What's the problem?
5
posted on
07/15/2006 10:35:14 AM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Deadeye Division
After hearing of Roeding's "queers" remark, Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville, said he called Roeding Friday. Williams said he told Roeding, "Most people feel that is an unacceptable term to use and I regretted the fact that he used the term and that he should refrain from using that term because it's inappropriate." So why do they gush over the show Queer Eye for Straight Guy?
And what about that Queer Nation bunch?
6
posted on
07/15/2006 10:38:59 AM PDT
by
cowboyway
(My heroes have always been Cowboys)
To: Graybeard58
This is how they GET someone. It's something the liberals have done for a generation. Find an "enemy" wait til they say something that gets splashed in the media and go in for the kill.
Sickening, but it usually works.
7
posted on
07/15/2006 10:42:50 AM PDT
by
kjo
To: Graybeard58
Only queers can use the term queer :P
8
posted on
07/15/2006 10:45:08 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Deadeye Division; RonPaulLives; SLB; BlueOneGolf; Republican Wildcat
KY PING?......Does this even deserve a mention?
...looks like the Lexington Herald -Leaders', new owners haven't changed its "very very close *smirk* / intimate / friendly" gay policy....
9
posted on
07/15/2006 10:48:23 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you....... :^)
To: Deadeye Division; RonPaulLives; SLB; BlueOneGolf; Republican Wildcat
KY PING?......
Does this even deserve a mention?
...looks like the Lexington Herald -(mis)Leaders', new owners haven't changed its "very very close *smirk* / intimate / friendly" gay policy....
*embarrassed*....Its' The Cincinnati Post....Still needs to be asked? KY PING?
10
posted on
07/15/2006 10:53:16 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you....... :^)
To: Graybeard58
The queers call themselves queers. What's the problem? I guess it is like the whole N-word thing. Only the oppressed party can use it and be proud of it.
To: operation clinton cleanup
"I-am-an-oppressed-victim
hear-me-whine"
(repeat, repeat)
To: DuxFan4ever
...but that gets lost by using the term he used.A lot of the queers use that word to describe themselves and other queers, just like black rappers call each other niggers.
I don't see a problem with the word.
FMCDH(BITS)
13
posted on
07/15/2006 11:20:29 AM PDT
by
nothingnew
(I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
To: DuxFan4ever
Why is it deemed acceptable to refer to homosexuals as gays but not as queers?? Seems to me the homosexuals have indoctrinated most Americans into using politically correct terms?????
14
posted on
07/15/2006 11:32:42 AM PDT
by
sinbad17
To: DuxFan4ever
Why is it deemed acceptable to refer to homosexuals as gays but not as queers?? Seems to me the homosexuals have indoctrinated most Americans into using politically correct terms?????
15
posted on
07/15/2006 11:32:46 AM PDT
by
sinbad17
To: Deadeye Division
There IS no problem with the word queer. It still means odd, out of the norm.
Log Cabin Republicans IMO are homosexuals who chose to infiltrate the party just as homosexual priests did the Church. They are not Republicans when they espouse extremists, liberal, social engineering terms and support activist agendas.
16
posted on
07/15/2006 11:33:36 AM PDT
by
gidget7
(PC is the huge rock, behind which lies hide!)
To: Graybeard58
The queers call themselves queers. What's the problem? I said to my black friend Raphael once, "I don't say 'nigger,' why do you?" And he said (with his dry wit), "You'd better not, or you'll find your @ss hanging from a tree."
To: Graybeard58
Well, Blacks call each other the "N" word; but don't you try it.
18
posted on
07/15/2006 11:39:36 AM PDT
by
no dems
(www.4condi.com)
To: nonliberal
Why do Republicans apologize for telling the truth? It's standard operating procedure for liberals to force Republicans to apologize. Number one, it demoralizes conservatives. Number two, it gives liberals themselves the green light to further bash the Republican in question.
I just wish Republicans, when they make these statements, to make them & disregard liberals who want them to apologize.
To: Deadeye Division
They call themselves queers. This is what you call a set-up-condemnation. They use the term but label others who use it as inappropriate. Even if that were not the case (it is), when you make your claim to fame founded on an unnatural act, you shouldn't be surprised if someone somewhere uses the term queer. It is unusual, abnormal, different, queer.
20
posted on
07/15/2006 11:48:17 AM PDT
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson