Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The electro-magnetic gun program gets US$14.7 million
Gizmag ^ | 7/7/06 | Gizmag

Posted on 07/07/2006 1:12:03 PM PDT by Reaganesque

July 7, 2006 The United States Navy has awarded two contracts for the development of an electro-magnetic gun system capable of deployment on board naval surface combatant ships. The development work preliminary design for an Electro-Magnetic (EM) railgun prototype and the preliminary design of the U.S Navy's 32 megajoule (MJ) Laboratory Launcher. An electro-magnetic railgun uses electrical energy to accelerate projectiles to extreme velocities. Railguns do not require powders or explosives to fire the round and therefore free magazine space for other mission areas. In addition, electro-magnetic guns provide a highly consistent and uniform explosive charge that gives much greater accuracy. Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound. This will be an intermediate step on the road to a 64-MJ Tactical System capable of deployment on-board naval surface combatant ships.

The development work includes a US$9.3 million contract from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) to develop technologies and preliminary design for an Electro-Magnetic (EM) railgun prototype and a US$5.4M contract from Naval Special Warfare Center-Dahlgren for the design and fabrication of the U.S Navy's 32 megajoule (MJ) Laboratory Launcher.

BAE Systems was selected by ONR to advance to the next phase of the Innovative Naval Prototype Program. Under this 30-month phase, BAE Systems will take the state-of-the-art Electro-Magnetic Railgun technologies through technology maturation and develop a preliminary design of a 32-MJ EM Railgun. Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound. This will be an intermediate step on the road to a 64-MJ Tactical System capable of deployment on-board naval surface combatant ships. The design and fabrication of the 32-MJ Laboratory Launcher will serve as a major step towards development of a full-scale tactical EM Gun weapon system for the U.S. Navy.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: bang; emgun; miltech; navy; railgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Redleg Duke

Or was it Danny Vermin?


41 posted on 07/07/2006 1:46:52 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (¡Salga de los Estados Unidos de América, invasor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e
I read in a SciFi novel, (can't remember which) that the projectiles used were just cubes of Lexan. The speed to which the cubes were accelerated, caused the Lexan to turn to plasma.

I don't know if there is any hard science to the above scenario, but it leaves me thinking of the scene in Terminator where Arnold asks the gun store owner for a "phased plasma rifle".

To the engineers and other big brained folks on this forum, what would a projectile have to be made of to stay together at Mach 8 plus?
42 posted on 07/07/2006 1:51:26 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Let's try posting the picture again. Not sure why it didn't work before.


43 posted on 07/07/2006 1:52:49 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

64 MJ would propel the projectile at about 15,488 feet/second. A round from my .300 win mag has a muzzle velocity of about 3600 ft./sec.


44 posted on 07/07/2006 1:56:36 PM PDT by Mogollon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

"Would an EMP knock out a reactor?"

No, an EMP would not knock out the reactor.

However, any electronic components associated with either the control of the reactor or the transmission/switching of the power would get fried unless it were properly shielded.


45 posted on 07/07/2006 2:00:34 PM PDT by roaddog727 (Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mc6809e

Don't forget, though, that we're not just talking about the source. There has to be electronics of some size to take that amount of electrical energy, store it, and then release it quickly but in a highly controlled fashion.


46 posted on 07/07/2006 2:03:56 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
If you want to think of something even cooler, imagine a CIWS vulcan cannon using something like this.

BB's at 15000fps at 6000rpm

47 posted on 07/07/2006 2:04:30 PM PDT by Centurion2000 (If you're going to lie; do it well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
1.7 Giggiawatts?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
48 posted on 07/07/2006 2:05:43 PM PDT by Famishus (I have not lost my mind; it's backed up on disc somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
No it is actually fired by energy, think big bad ass batteries. Possibly chemical batteries if it is like the ones I read about a few years back.
49 posted on 07/07/2006 2:10:48 PM PDT by A Texan (Oderint dum metuant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sergio
David Drake (Hammers Slammers) had copper ion guns where the ammo was held in a plastic matrix.... could that be it?

Big part of the story was fusion powered, air-cushioned battle tanks.

Also featured air-cushioned Hogs, CAV (combat cars) and Jeeps. BR>

50 posted on 07/07/2006 2:11:46 PM PDT by ASOC (The phrase "What if" or "If only" are for children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque
Electric Guns are not new concepts, with the first experiments going back to World War I by the French, and later in World War II by the Germans.

Check these links for more details:

http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/electricgun/index.html

http://www.geocities.com/pentagon/2833/wunderwaffen/supergun/electricgun/electricgun.html

51 posted on 07/07/2006 2:18:08 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner ("Si vis pacem para bellum")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio
"what would a projectile have to be made of to stay together at Mach 8 plus?"
While moving through what medium? In 1 atm air any high melting alloy would do.
52 posted on 07/07/2006 2:21:48 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

The Slammers used "Power Guns" which fired some sort of undefined energy bolt that was apparently assembled out of metallic ions in the plastic matrix. They apparently spent their energy on the first solid object encountered (how this was defined escapes me...), limiting their penetrating power (which didn't stop 'em from knocking out tanks...).


53 posted on 07/07/2006 2:29:20 PM PDT by Little Ray (If you want to be a martyr, we want to martyr you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RonF

That's what capacitors are for. Capacitor bank for 64MJ is rather heavy. If one counts that a lot of electric energy gets dissipated out, then one needs much larger and bulkier capacitor bank.


54 posted on 07/07/2006 2:29:20 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

"The gun is supposed to be on a nuclear powered naval ship. Would an EMP knock out a reactor? I second the call for someone with a bigger brain."

Depends on the shielding -- it is fairly easy to shield against EMP. Basically just put a metal cage ("Faraday shielding" I believe it's called) around the sensitive parts or the whole ship interior for that matter. Remember, EMP is not designed to take out military assets or kill people, it's intended to crush a civilian high-tech economy. (And yes, we could shield practically everything, but the sheer volume of stuff that would have to be shielded makes this prohibitively expensive.)


55 posted on 07/07/2006 2:29:35 PM PDT by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ImaTexan

PING! PING!


56 posted on 07/07/2006 2:30:12 PM PDT by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
(which didn't stop 'em from knocking out tanks...).

Highly effective on incoming artillery as well. Slave the "blowers" guns to air defense, and rip the arty out of the sky. I love the Slammers. I think that I've read everything that Drake wrote. Awesome writer.

57 posted on 07/07/2006 2:39:20 PM PDT by wyattearp (Study! Study! Study! Or BONK, BONK, on the head!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad

From Back To The Future, it's supposed to be "One Point Twenty-One Jiggawatts"


58 posted on 07/07/2006 2:40:47 PM PDT by San Franistan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Reaganesque

I would like the hand held version please!


59 posted on 07/07/2006 2:42:51 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

No, haven't read any of that series, but from your description, I will pick up a copy this weekend. Sounds like a fun read.


60 posted on 07/07/2006 3:01:09 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson