Posted on 07/07/2006 1:12:03 PM PDT by Reaganesque
July 7, 2006 The United States Navy has awarded two contracts for the development of an electro-magnetic gun system capable of deployment on board naval surface combatant ships. The development work preliminary design for an Electro-Magnetic (EM) railgun prototype and the preliminary design of the U.S Navy's 32 megajoule (MJ) Laboratory Launcher. An electro-magnetic railgun uses electrical energy to accelerate projectiles to extreme velocities. Railguns do not require powders or explosives to fire the round and therefore free magazine space for other mission areas. In addition, electro-magnetic guns provide a highly consistent and uniform explosive charge that gives much greater accuracy. Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound. This will be an intermediate step on the road to a 64-MJ Tactical System capable of deployment on-board naval surface combatant ships.
The development work includes a US$9.3 million contract from the Office of Naval Research (ONR) to develop technologies and preliminary design for an Electro-Magnetic (EM) railgun prototype and a US$5.4M contract from Naval Special Warfare Center-Dahlgren for the design and fabrication of the U.S Navy's 32 megajoule (MJ) Laboratory Launcher.
BAE Systems was selected by ONR to advance to the next phase of the Innovative Naval Prototype Program. Under this 30-month phase, BAE Systems will take the state-of-the-art Electro-Magnetic Railgun technologies through technology maturation and develop a preliminary design of a 32-MJ EM Railgun. Thirty-two megajoule is equivalent to a firing speed of Mach 8 or eight times the speed of sound. This will be an intermediate step on the road to a 64-MJ Tactical System capable of deployment on-board naval surface combatant ships. The design and fabrication of the 32-MJ Laboratory Launcher will serve as a major step towards development of a full-scale tactical EM Gun weapon system for the U.S. Navy.
Or was it Danny Vermin?
64 MJ would propel the projectile at about 15,488 feet/second. A round from my .300 win mag has a muzzle velocity of about 3600 ft./sec.
"Would an EMP knock out a reactor?"
No, an EMP would not knock out the reactor.
However, any electronic components associated with either the control of the reactor or the transmission/switching of the power would get fried unless it were properly shielded.
Don't forget, though, that we're not just talking about the source. There has to be electronics of some size to take that amount of electrical energy, store it, and then release it quickly but in a highly controlled fashion.
BB's at 15000fps at 6000rpm
Big part of the story was fusion powered, air-cushioned battle tanks.
Also featured air-cushioned Hogs, CAV (combat cars) and Jeeps. BR>
Check these links for more details:
http://www.lonesentry.com/articles/electricgun/index.html
http://www.geocities.com/pentagon/2833/wunderwaffen/supergun/electricgun/electricgun.html
The Slammers used "Power Guns" which fired some sort of undefined energy bolt that was apparently assembled out of metallic ions in the plastic matrix. They apparently spent their energy on the first solid object encountered (how this was defined escapes me...), limiting their penetrating power (which didn't stop 'em from knocking out tanks...).
That's what capacitors are for. Capacitor bank for 64MJ is rather heavy. If one counts that a lot of electric energy gets dissipated out, then one needs much larger and bulkier capacitor bank.
"The gun is supposed to be on a nuclear powered naval ship. Would an EMP knock out a reactor? I second the call for someone with a bigger brain."
Depends on the shielding -- it is fairly easy to shield against EMP. Basically just put a metal cage ("Faraday shielding" I believe it's called) around the sensitive parts or the whole ship interior for that matter. Remember, EMP is not designed to take out military assets or kill people, it's intended to crush a civilian high-tech economy. (And yes, we could shield practically everything, but the sheer volume of stuff that would have to be shielded makes this prohibitively expensive.)
PING! PING!
Highly effective on incoming artillery as well. Slave the "blowers" guns to air defense, and rip the arty out of the sky. I love the Slammers. I think that I've read everything that Drake wrote. Awesome writer.
From Back To The Future, it's supposed to be "One Point Twenty-One Jiggawatts"
I would like the hand held version please!
No, haven't read any of that series, but from your description, I will pick up a copy this weekend. Sounds like a fun read.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.