Here's the prototype. It also holds open your eyes so you can't close them. They're still working on the automatic eyedrop dispenser to keep your eyes from drying out and your vision getting blurry.
Posted on 07/06/2006 6:08:14 AM PDT by abb
Pinging the Dinosaur Media DeathWatch™ List
I use the FF much more than the reverse.
What's next? Will the networks demand that the "On/Off" switch be disabled so they can force feed their crap to us?
Related story...
ABC Wraps Up Ad Sales, Broadcast Upfront Total Reaches $9 Billion
by Wayne Friedman and David Goetzl, Thursday, Jul 6, 2006 8:45 AM ET
ABC HAS CONCLUDED ITS PRIME-TIME upfront sales activity to the tune of $2.3 billion, and the entire broadcast upfront market's labored four-week journey is finally drawing to a close, with the total market hitting overall revenue levels similar to a year ago--about $9 billion, according to the broadcast networks' estimates.
Final totals look like this: ABC, $2.3 billion; CBS, $2.3 billion; NBC, $1.9 billion; Fox, $1.8 billion; The CW, $650 million. My Network TV, which isn't quite finished, according to executives, is expected to pull in $50 million. A My Network TV spokeswoman didn't return phone calls by press time.
But media buying executives insist that some of these numbers are too high--with one media agency executive maintaining that as much as $600 million is sitting on the sidelines or designated for digital advertising. Concerning the latter, Mike Shaw, president of advertising sales of ABC Television Network, said that this wasn't the case.
"Very little went to digital," said Shaw. "For example, we didn't sell our broadband or VOD in the upfront. We haven't, as yet, figured out the metrics in how to sell MyABC."
Shaw added, however, that certain ABC.com and ABCNews.com Internet extensions were included in upfront deals. For its own part, NBC has said that it grabbed $50 million in new digital advertising money.
MyABC, which will be sold on a scatter basis, is the network's initiative to offer full episodes of hit shows on-demand on ABC.com. ABC has just completed a two-month trial with shows such as "Lost" and "Desperate Housewives," and is evaluating advertising and programming models.
Regardless of its conclusions, Shaw said a batch of new shows will be available on the site when the new season launches, if not before. However, he said the network would not follow NBC's example of premiering shows on its Web site--a move that has angered affiliates who feel their ratings and revenues are hurt by the alternate distribution. "Nothing will premiere online," Shaw said. "Our affiliates are going to get it first."
Overall in the upfront, ABC says it booked $3 billion for all its dayparts--selling 75 percent to 80 percent of its prime-time inventory, down from the 78 percent to 83 percent of a year ago. Media buyers say ABC got anywhere from 2 percent to 3 percent price increases on the cost-per-thousand viewers (CPM). This was similar to what Fox received--but much lower than ABC's pre-upfront wishful increases in the 5 percent to 6 percent range.
ABC benefited from the bold move to shift "Grey's Anatomy" to Thursdays, and was able to leverage its three tent pole programs--"Desperate Housewives," "Lost," and "Grey's"--to pump prime-time sales. The interest in the three boffo hits may have offset buyers' wariness about the fate of the slew of new shows ABC is introducing this fall.
As opposed to quick two- or three-day upfront markets of years ago, ABC--as well as CBS and others--needed several weeks to complete their upfront activities. Primarily, this was to hit their overall revenue goals.
Secondarily, this was to build a foundation for a healthy scatter market, since less prime-time inventory typically means potentially higher prices. The fourth-quarter scatter market starts up in a few weeks. Last season, ABC--as opposed to other networks--says it witnessed scatter increases of 10 percent or more.
This wasn't the case for the broadcast networks business as a whole. "For a variety of reasons, there wasn't the penalty for buying in the scatter market versus the upfront for the last two years," said Shaw. "You haven't been burned by buying scatter."
While he admitted that prime time took a hit in terms of cost per thousand viewers pricing (CPM), Shaw added: "We weren't down in other dayparts--morning, news, and daytime. Late night was down a little."
He said Charlie Gibson's recent success on "World News Tonight" and Rosie O'Donnell's joining the daytime talk show "The View" drew buyer interest.
Shaw took issue with the fact that ABC's somewhat delayed start hurt the network going into the upfront season. "It may have slowed us down slightly," he said. "It sure as hell didn't speed things up. But I can tell you it didn't affect one dollar, one budget from what we are looking at before the upfront began."
ABC was at the forefront of the live plus DVR viewing issue, pushing marketers to consider paying more for DVR viewing. It abandoned that issue just after the upfront market was beginning to move, when Fox and CBS began making early deals.
To those who were confused about the issue, Shaw says that ABC never intended to get paid for those commercials not viewed. He said: "We didn't want to get paid for DVR playback if the commercials were skipped. That wasn't our intent, nor would it ever have been. We just believed--and still philosophically do to this day--that the value is something other than zero."
That's why I built my MythTV: nobody can disable MY fast-forward.
I love zapping commercials.
More...
Ad Execs, Media Divided On Source Of Upfront Ad Erosion
by Joe Mandese, Thursday, Jul 6, 2006 8:45 AM ET
WITH OFFICIAL FINAL ESTIMATES FOR 2006-07 network prime-time upfront ad deals being reported by the advertising trade press (see related story in today's edition), it seems that the upfront market may have shrunk. The big question on the minds of both buyers and sellers, of course, is how much money has been held back for next season's scatter marketplace. The answer may be not much, according to the findings of an unscientific survey conducted online by InsightExpress for MediaPost. Asked what they believe the reason for lower upfront as spending is, most advertisers and agencies said they were either being diverted to other media, or other marketing platforms, and would not resurface as incremental network ad spending next season. Eighty-three percent of marketers and 62.5 percent of media buyers said they believed upfront ad dollars have been diverted to other sources, though opinions for the destination of those funds was split among advertisers and agencies. Half of the advertisers responding to the survey believe those budgets are going to other forms of marketing, while half the agency executives believe they are simply going to other forms of media.
Not surprisingly, only a minority of media sellers believe those funds have been diverted from network TV, with a third expecting they will rematerialize during the scatter marketplace (see table below).
The survey, which was launched in mid-June as trade publications began reporting about initial estimates for the 2006-07 upfront marketplace, also suggests that the trade press plays a significant role in shaping expectations about the marketplace, and is generally considered the most credible source for such information - more so even than public comments by advertisers, media buyers and media sellers, as well as public reports by Wall Street securities firms. It should be noted, however, that results are drawn from a relatively small base: 53 respondents, and only a handful (six) of advertisers, and therefore should be treated anecdotally.
Among press outlets, advertising trades were deemed more credible than either TV industry trade magazines or major daily newspapers in their coverage of the upfront, and Advertising Age was deemed the "most" or "second" or "third" most credible source overall, followed closely by MediaPost and Mediaweek, which were essentially tied. More than half (54.4 percent) of the respondents said they believed the trade press' coverage of the upfront, even though a slight majority (56.7 percent) said they believe this year's upfront negotiations were conducted more "secretively" than normal.
A significant minority (39.6 percent) of respondents said they feel upfront negotiations with the networks should be kept secret, though the percentage of media buyers (43.8 percent) and media sellers (50.0 percent) outweighed the percentage of advertisers (33.3 percent) who felt that way.
A slight majority (56.6 percent) of all respondents said network upfront sales data should be compiled and reported by an independent third party such as the Broadcast Cable Financial Management Association, with 83.3 percent of advertisers expressing that thought.
Despite their overall confidence in trade press coverage of the upfront, only 3.8 percent of all respondents - and not one advertisers - believe the upfront marketplace is "wrapped up" when trade publications report it to be. Nearly 70 percent of the respondents said they did not expect network upfront ad deals to be completed until after July 4th Weekend.
>>ABC HAS HELD DISCUSSIONS ON the use of technology that would disable the fast-forward button on DVRs, according to ABC President of Advertising Sales Mike Shaw, with the primary goal to allow TV commercials to run as intended.
"I would love it if the MSOs, during the deployment of the new DVRs they're putting out there, would disable the fast-forward [button]," Shaw said.<<
This would be the best way to encourage internet trading of shows with the commericals stripped out entirely.
Some? My DVR will go in the crapper the moment that FF is disabled. Of course, if it is only for ABC, that isn't a problem...there is zero on that network that I watch.
dunno. must be the cable/satellite operators?
MSO = ? Satellite operators...
Hah! And after that, they'll create the barcolounger automatic seatbelt that locks shut when you sit down, and won't unfasten during commercials, no doubt!
Nope, next they will disable the channel changer buttons so we can't channel-surf during commercials.
If you take away my fast forward button I won't buy your equipment. If worse comes to worse, I'll just go back to recording on DVDs or even (shudder) video tapes so I can continue fast forwarding.
One response by the networks is producing shows like Treasure Product Placement Hunters where they make sure to get their hints on Motorolla Razor phones, look up information on Ask.com and schedule their flights on Orbitz - continually. I think the show is just a warning on how bad things will get if everyone skips commercials.
One other thing I can see is instead of having 10 minutes of show followed by 5 minutes of commercials, going to 2 minutes of show and 15-30 seconds of commercials so you are likely to watch more of it before you hit the fast forward button and are more likely to catch some of it when getting back to the show.
"I'm not sure that the driving reason to get a DVR in the first place is just to skip commercials."
Keep smoking crack, the real world will always be here... heheheh.
That is the primary reason I use my dvr. In fact, I sometimes watch a show an hour later just to have the abilty to skip commectials. Why should I have to pay for satellite and then watch commercials too.
This would destroy the DVR market. This is one segment of the hard drive industry that is actually expanding, especially with HDTV DVRs. Regardless of what ABC decides, I am sure that a patch would be available for download on the Net to disable the function.
DVR's rock.
Here's the prototype. It also holds open your eyes so you can't close them. They're still working on the automatic eyedrop dispenser to keep your eyes from drying out and your vision getting blurry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.