Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Airbus begins installation of A380 wing reinforcements
flightglobal.com ^ | July 4, 2006 | Max Kingsley-Jones

Posted on 07/03/2006 10:00:54 AM PDT by smonk

Airbus begins installation of A380 wing reinforcements By Max Kingsley-Jones in Filton

Airbus has begun to install a strengthening package on to the wing of a completed A380 as an interim solution after the static-test specimen suffered a premature rupture during its ultimate load test. Meanwhile, Airbus UK is working on a long-term redesign of components.

“We have devised a small modification package while we go through the analysis to understand [the rupture] in detail and devise a long-term solution, to present that to the European Aviation Safety Agency [EASA],” says Airbus UK head of A380 wing engineering Phil Hamblin. “The interim package is being put into the aircraft on the production line at the moment. Longer term, rather than add on reinforcings, we’ll embody the modifications into the machining of the baseline components at source.”

Airbus UK senior vice-president Brian Fleet says the interim modifications have been incorporated into the wing of MSN003, which is the first A380 for Singapore Airlines and currently in Hamburg for cabin installation.

“The remainder of the wings that have already been delivered will be modified in the next few months,” says Fleet. “Wings delivered from MSN018 onwards will have the modifications incorporated before delivery to the final assembly line.”

Hamblin says that, although the interim modifications have not been approved by EASA, the agency “has been taken through our findings and our analysis of the test, and has approved our approach”. He adds that approval “will be covered in the documentation presented for A380 certification” later this year.

Fleet says discussions are already under way with suppliers about modifying the base designs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: a380; airbus; boeing; eads
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: smonk


The "reinforcements".
21 posted on 07/03/2006 10:32:48 AM PDT by LIConFem (It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmailbvmbipfwedu

IMHO, we just don't understand the structural properties of composites well enough to try to use them in aircraft of this size and weight.

I also don't believe we understand how these materials degrade as they age, since they are so new.

I wouldn't want to fly on this aircraft, with wiring problems, fly by wire, and composite construction.


22 posted on 07/03/2006 10:33:52 AM PDT by EEDUDE (Don't measure your wealth in dollars and cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Grrr... You only beat me by 29+ minutes :o(


23 posted on 07/03/2006 10:33:57 AM PDT by LIConFem (It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy
"I think it is turning out to be an engineering quagmire"

Hey, I thought "quagmire" was only reserved for Iraq?
What you doin' using that word for the mighty Euro-socialist project that shows the superiority of Europeans over those naive Americans? :)
24 posted on 07/03/2006 10:36:28 AM PDT by Jameison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: smonk

They need to check that center fuel tank thingy while they're at it......and glue the tail on tighter.


25 posted on 07/03/2006 10:36:52 AM PDT by exit82 (If Democrats can lead, then I'm Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smonk

ScareBus is more like it.


26 posted on 07/03/2006 10:38:23 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

Hear, hear. Witness the Airbus that lost its vertical stab during takeoff and crashed around New York a few years ago.


27 posted on 07/03/2006 10:38:27 AM PDT by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LIConFem

LOL! I have always linked "AirBus" to duct tape. It's an automatic laugh.


28 posted on 07/03/2006 10:38:33 AM PDT by TommyDale (Stop the Nifongery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

I've always linked AirBus to lawn darts, myself :o)


29 posted on 07/03/2006 10:39:42 AM PDT by LIConFem (It is by will alone I set my mind in motion...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: smonk

Wings fall off and critical wiring is bad - boy those europeans really know how to build a plane. You won't see me on one.


30 posted on 07/03/2006 10:46:17 AM PDT by Humvee (Beliefs are more powerful than facts - Paulus Atreides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

are they even designed to make a profit? It seems they will only make money with parts repairs.

Which is scarry considering there is then an incentive to make parts that wear out sooner than later. (and the contrary effort the the "budget minded" airline to extend partlife beyond recomendations)


31 posted on 07/03/2006 10:51:51 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: USNBandit
I saw a piece on the the DC10. Apparently, the hardware for an outer cargo hold door would warp when trying to seal
the door if it wasn't really secured, sending a false signal that the door wasn't a jar.

So, the plane might depressurized suddenly, collapsing the passenger floor...

The end of it was once the hardware was replaced, (automatic vents for the floor, too) it was too late for the
passenger days of the DC10.

They are now an efficient cargo transporter, though.

32 posted on 07/03/2006 10:53:41 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: smonk

"...suffered a premature rupture during its ultimate load test..."

Scary mental image, isn't it?


33 posted on 07/03/2006 10:56:28 AM PDT by butternut_squash_bisque (The recipe's at my FR HomePage. Try it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: americanstrategist

Another Concorde-type loser, except on a grander scale?


34 posted on 07/03/2006 10:59:00 AM PDT by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Humvee
meh, how important is it for the wings to stay on when the emergency escape chutes work so well?

Sweet irony

35 posted on 07/03/2006 11:19:21 AM PDT by smonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EEDUDE

I can still remember the response to a suggestion we incorporate "plastics" into high end Hard Disk Drives in the 70's...

"Plastics are not a sufficiently understood engineering material"....

Semper Fi


36 posted on 07/03/2006 11:25:49 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smonk

This plane is still in the Beta stage.


37 posted on 07/03/2006 11:46:13 AM PDT by Socratic ("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smonk
Airbus A380: The BIG PIG

Hopefully the additions will make it so heavy they won't be able to "cram" more than 400 people into it. (I know, the additions aren't likely to weigh 30 tons.)

38 posted on 07/03/2006 11:47:41 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jameison

I dunno...wasn't thinking straight I guess.


39 posted on 07/03/2006 12:06:35 PM PDT by Banjoguy (I refuse to 'Google' anything at anytime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

(I think it is turning out to be an engineering quagmire)

I think they should pull out of there, or as Murtha would say, reverse direction!


40 posted on 07/03/2006 12:10:01 PM PDT by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson