Posted on 06/30/2006 6:13:55 PM PDT by FairOpinion
U.S. Rep. Curt Weldon presided over a House Armed Services Committee hearing Thursday in which the commander of the National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC) acknowledged that the degraded chemical munitions revealed in last weeks report constitute weapons of mass destruction.
While the usefulness of the approximately 500 pre-Gulf War munitions is disputed by weapons experts, Weldon said in his opening statement their discovery over the past three years justifies the March 2003 invasion to topple Saddam Husseins Baathist regime.
"I want to be absolutely clear about what we are talking about here. These 500 chemical munitions are weapons of mass destruction," said Weldon, R-7, of Thornbury. "Some may want to play down the significance of this report or even deny that WMD have been found in Iraq."
Weldon ... indicating that during his next trip to Iraq he would question military leaders on potential WMD sites that have yet to be searched.
Thursdays hearing was in response to an April 2006 intelligence report that was partially declassified last week and released by U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum and House Intelligence Committee Chairman Peter Hoekstra. The declassified section of the report said the projectiles preceded the 1991 Gulf War and contained degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent.
(Excerpt) Read more at zwire.com ...
Exactly right. Another reason these blithe "we wouldn't have invaded if..." claims people so easily and casually toss out there make no sense. In any given counterfactual the "case for war" would likely be different as needed and we may have still invaded. Or not, as the case may be.
My point from the get-go (perhaps inartfully stated) is that I don't think it's likely to redound to their benefit in the way they hope.
Indeed, it might not. Nevertheless, it vindicates the WMD claims at the UN, as a simply matter of fact. To me, that's why it's relevant. When people imply it's not relevant, this is what they are missing.
I don't think it will convince anybody who actually believes he lied.
Me neither :) but it should, logically.
Bush HAS the authority to declassify information, the NYT does NOT.
Does anyone on FR know which organophosphate pesticide was found in bulk at an Iraqi military site? I've done Google searches intermittently since the find in 2004, and still haven't gotten an answer.
"That's fine, but it has nothing to do with these old degraded munitions that people keep hyping."
If you have the time, please read the following thread. The link to the BBC article is there. If you click on it, it is the second story on the page, and CONTINUES down to the bottom.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1654560/posts
If you take the time, and read the article,it even tells how the piles of these "old degraded munitions" waiting for pick up by the military for destruction, are being STOLEN AND SOLD on the black market, before some of them can be collected for destruction.
They would make a NASTY IED.......
I just did a quick Google search and didn't find what pesticides, but came across this article:
U.S.: Mobile labs found in Iraq
http://edition.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/14/sprj.irq.labs/
April 15, 2003
U.S. troops have found 11 mobile laboratories buried south of Baghdad that are capable of biological and chemical uses, a U.S. general said Monday.
Troops found the mobile laboratories near a weapons plant outside Karbala, about 50 miles south of Baghdad. Though buried, they appeared to contain about $1 million worth of equipment and were "clearly marked so they could be found again," Freakley said.
Last week, troops from the 101st Airborne found a stash of chemicals, which was investigated as possible nerve agents, but the material turned out to be pesticides, Freakly said. The United States will further examine the latest find, he said.
=====
Now why would someone use a million dollar worth of MOBILE equipment, then bury it, if all they were doing is manufacturing innocent pesticides????
I certainly don't know. As for an exercise in logic, it seems that if large quantities of chemical protective suits were found, including antidote kits, then there were, or had been, lethal chemicals nearby.
Here is a little bit I came across:
Iraq's Five Most Toxic SItes to be Decontaminated
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/nov2005/2005-11-14-06.asp
"The Al Suwaira pesticided warehouse complex was used to store, mix and dispatch a range of pesticieds over its 30-year life. These included mercury, zinc, and calcium compounds, as well as organo-chlorine and organo-phosphorus substances like lindane, heptachlor and DDT."
Chemical weapons:
sulfur, mustard, VX, chlorine, sarin, H. Cyanide
See my previous post go to the article, it mentions losts of H. cyanide was found also.
Sorry about the piecemeal post -- I forgot to post the link to the site which identified what are considered chemical weapons.
http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/biochem.weapons/
Where the heck is his report on what Sandy Berger took? He told Savage it would be out soon.
:}Bump.
He does?
Yes, the President does have the authority to declassify information.
I don't recall where I read it, but it was in an article that sounded authoritative and it makes sense. The President is our Commander-In-Chief.
The President can decide that previously classified information may serve national security better, if it's declassified. That is not equivalent to people willy nilly releasing classified information, the release of which is harmful to our national security.
This poster should be sent to all the MSM and the Dems in Congress.
Plans To Produce Prohibited Chemical Weapons Precursors http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1657480/posts
Excellent post.
Joseph,
I was about to go to bed. I just wanted to say Hello to you and wish you well.
When you get time can you send an email back to me with a link to any story you may know of on those perfume bottles that were going to be used to store sarin and mustard and be sent to the U.S.?
Thanks and take care,
Mark
My recollection of the Canadian document indicated they were both about half as toxic as GA, but
http://hazmap.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/hazmap_generic?tbl=TblAgents&id=261
indicates TEPP is twice as toxic as parathion, so it's the one most interesting.
Curiously, the Haz-Map site does not list any of the pesticide names from your recently translated document, so there is a question as to what the North American names of the compounds they were producing are. A Google search turns up Focran as an organophosphate pesticide common in Pakistan, Avitrol as a poison for killing birds, and only your document translation as a reference for the other two.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.