Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More scientists express doubts on Darwin
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | June 22, 2006 1:00 a.m. Eastern

Posted on 06/22/2006 1:28:41 PM PDT by Tim Long

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,121-1,138 next last
To: itsahoot; stands2reason
Re 131: God just appeared out of nothing, and created Satan, who in turn created logic.

Aha. God was so powerful that he created the Universe in the Big Bang, yet He also created Satan? When He could have chosen not to create Satan? And yet Satan is very powerful and the final outcome of Armageddon has to await 1000 years (a blip on the 13 billion years since the big bang). And all this 'understanding' started with a snake suddenly moved to start speaking in a language known to Eve? And all this became important before Adam's first argument (in some language) with Eve over 'what's for dinner'?

In searching for the origins of logic, Genesis is hardly the first place to look! Credit to the Greeks.

141 posted on 06/22/2006 5:56:40 PM PDT by thomaswest (Just curious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest

Thank you for your kind comments...Unfortunately the outcome was not positive...my son died about one year after this event...

I could not cure my son, but I could make sure, that nosey parker people were kept away from him, and that is something that I did...my son had many prayer groups from many different churches praying for him, and many different priests and ministers who were invited by him, and by me tend to his spiritual needs...he was 15, and knew how terribly ill he was and knew he would probably not survive...so he armed himself with prayers and guidance and kind thoughts and kind words from those 'religious' people he knew and admired....

When he died, he was entirely at peace with his situation...he fully trusted that the Lord, would keep him in His care....he did not need these nosey, loud, uncharitable folks for support...he had support from true loving people, who had his welfare in mind, and did not need another 'cure', to boost their tally count of those that they had saved(which is exactly how I regarded these awful people who wanted to barge in on my son)..


142 posted on 06/22/2006 5:57:57 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
I completely agree. That's why I hope you'll support the inclusion of time cube, which has been unfairly suppressed by people who afraid of the truth and beholden to neo-Stalinist Darwinism.
143 posted on 06/22/2006 5:59:10 PM PDT by HostileTerritory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: balrog666

Ah, you have picked exactly the correct word...they were indeed, 'buffoons'....


144 posted on 06/22/2006 5:59:33 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
Ah, you have picked exactly the correct word...they were indeed, 'buffoons'....

I have long acquaintance with them. And they are all cut from the same flawed mold.

145 posted on 06/22/2006 6:06:51 PM PDT by balrog666 (There is no freedom like knowledge, no slavery like ignorance. - Ali ibn Ali-Talib)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04; Onelifetogive
Re 121: Holocaust-deniers and evolution-deniers sing from the same hymnal on this one. Trying to lump me in with Ahma...jad actually illustrates Onelifetogive's point very well. Thanks for the ping.

I may have missed something. What was the point illustrated?

On crevo threads I have read so often of "the evolutionist, Nazi, Marxist, communist, humanist, secularist, 'anti-Christian' conspiracy to fluoridate the water supply and destroy all morality". Are you aware of this plot?

146 posted on 06/22/2006 6:16:22 PM PDT by thomaswest (Just curious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam

Re #26 -- Adam and Eve were blonds? I don't think so either.


147 posted on 06/22/2006 6:21:37 PM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
It helps to read what one actually says rather than rely on postings of dubious reliability.
148 posted on 06/22/2006 6:25:19 PM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Mogollon
This is going to upset the darwin fundamentalists.

In case you hadn't noticed, although we "darwin fundamentalists" indeed don't agree with the political agenda behind the statement -- attempts to include antievolutionary ideas in science curricula on the basis of intellectual affirmative action rather than demonstrated merit in the professional marketplace of scientific ideas, and ultimately to use such as a "wedge issue" to wage explicitly religious culture war in science classes -- we DON'T actually disagree very much with the literal words of the statement.

Few... Correction... Almost certainly NO evolutionists (even "darwin fundamentalists") hold that natural selection plus random mutation is the sole mechanism driving evolution; and we all believe that evolution should be treated as any other important scientific theory, i.e. that it's substance should and does remain vulnerable to the acid skepticism of science.

Sorry to disappoint you.

149 posted on 06/22/2006 6:25:28 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest
"(a blip on the 13 billion years since the big bang)."

If we could accept the notion that the Big Bang happened on say for the sake of reference, January 1, 13 billion 6 thousand years ago.....

I cannot help myself wondering just what the New Year's Eve party was like on 31 December 13,000,006,001 BC! I suppose that nobody showed up, but if they knew then what we know now, it might have been a serious hoot.

Sorry, I'm stupid, but my solar powered calculator stopped doing scientific notation calculations for me earlier this week. That was right after one of those Thermodynamics Law thingys stopped supporting my perpetual motion calculator keyboard.

150 posted on 06/22/2006 6:31:02 PM PDT by Radix (Stop domestic violence. Beat abroad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic

You know, sometimes I think that people post a link, declare what is contained in the link, and then dont believe that other people will actually read the linked material...I dont rely on anyone, to tell me, what is contained in a link, nor how it should be looked at...I read most linked material...and so, apparently do a lot of other posters...and hence, some people get caught, misrepresenting what is actually in the linked material...not a good tactic...


151 posted on 06/22/2006 6:31:34 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest
Holcaust-deniers and evolution-deniers sing from the same hymnal on this one.

Darwin Central, "the conspiracy that cares," apologizes for this. Holocaust denial, although most occurences are "natural," is an occasional and unfortunate side effect of the brainwashing we're sometimes forced to employ.

In our defense most of this has to be done to protect other, much more nefarious conspiracies. After all, the definitive disproof of evilution doesn't even begin to make sense until you first understand the truth about the Hollow Earth, UFO's, and several other shocking truths that I dare not mention.

152 posted on 06/22/2006 6:37:46 PM PDT by Stultis (I don't worry about the war turning into "Vietnam" in Iraq; I worry about it doing so in Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot
Random chance cannot account for the complex design of DNA. It is statistically and mathematically impossible.

Well the microprocessor was statistically and mathematically impossible in the not so distant past. How long before we are accomplishing feats only a god could do? Or, do we already in the eyes of past civilizations?

153 posted on 06/22/2006 6:40:26 PM PDT by Realism (Some believe that the facts-of-life are open to debate.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

I think he might have hit the wrong inequality sign.


154 posted on 06/22/2006 6:40:49 PM PDT by hail to the chief (Use your conservatism liberally)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
AGAIN, I WILL THANK ANN COULTER FOR DESTROYING DARWIN IN HER BOOK, GODLESS.
155 posted on 06/22/2006 6:43:40 PM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are intimate bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom
Re 142: When he died, he was entirely at peace with his situation.

I am saddened that you suffered this loss. I am saddened that your son did not reach his full adulthood.

There are some unpredictable/random events in life. I refuse to attribute either good outcomes to a god or bad outcomes to a satan. Or fail to blame bad outcomes on a god who might have prevented them.

I do not have the same faith beliefs as you, but I think this goes out the window when we have real human caring involved. Human caring counts more than all the doctrinal issues ever conceived. As you elegantly said: he did not need these nosey, loud, uncharitable folks for support...he had support from true loving people, who had his welfare in mind, and did not need another 'cure', to boost their tally count of those that they had saved (which is exactly how I regarded these awful people who wanted to barge in on my son).

Wishing you peace.

156 posted on 06/22/2006 6:45:47 PM PDT by thomaswest (Humanists are wonderfully moral people, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: thomaswest

Thank you so much...your kind words, are of comfort to me...


157 posted on 06/22/2006 6:48:34 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: atlaw; stands2reason

No, what's totally predictable is that your 'explanation' of the TOE (and 'evidence') will be 'defined as true', consistent with a created genome that is in decline and/or metaphysical extrapolations that are untestable.

You are the ones who don't know that there is no unique evidence favoring the TOE.

If no unique evidence, then no basis for your certainty.


158 posted on 06/22/2006 6:48:47 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Stultis

Yah, I was right, but it's still not enough for you.

I'll just have to be satisfied w/ being right.

And evo reasons for opposing YEC are metaphysical as well, so where's the supposed advantage of your position?

You had some unique point that applied only to me, I presume?

Or did you just think you could pretend you did?


159 posted on 06/22/2006 6:52:04 PM PDT by GourmetDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Tim Long
+=
160 posted on 06/22/2006 6:52:25 PM PDT by NewLand (Posting against liberalism since the 20th century!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,121-1,138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson