Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE DOWNING OF TWA FLIGHT 800 Exclusive: Jack Cashill argues new investigation of '96 event ne
World Net Daily ^ | June 22, 2006 | Jack Cashill

Posted on 06/22/2006 7:35:47 AM PDT by drypowder

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=50736


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: credulousmorons; flight800; gibberish; jackcashill; jihadinamerica; nuckingfuts; paranoia; planecrash; twa; twaflight800
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last
To: DJ MacWoW

We had Directv (still do) and at the time were unable to get local stations. (Big loss, lol)
We got the news from the NYC main guys. East Coast.
A lot of the rules involving this have changed (become stupid) but we were prob looking at the same feed that night.
Now that I think about it, I am almost certain of it.


81 posted on 06/22/2006 9:18:00 AM PDT by carmenbmw (My cats name is Mean. He earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: jaydubya2
>>>why did no one claim responsibility?<<<

"Nation States" rarely, if ever, broadcast their involvement with terror strikes.

Saddam never claimed responsibility for any of his terror strikes or the ones he financed. He represented a "Nation State" - something we could go to war against. If the linkage was claimed, he could count on retaliation.

Only rootless terrorist organizations declare responsibility.

82 posted on 06/22/2006 9:18:31 AM PDT by HardStarboard (Hey, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard

Thanks, that makes sense.


83 posted on 06/22/2006 9:19:40 AM PDT by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: carmenbmw

Then we probably saw the same thing. I remember that guys home video. He was taping something else and saw the arc and turned the camera on it. And no one at the parties or on the beach seemed drunk to me. Did they to you?


84 posted on 06/22/2006 9:22:05 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
"Discovery Channel produced a documentary that was a pretty detailed and convincing recreation of the possible events that would indeed cause the center tank explosion on Flight 800. ..."

And as a Physics major I laffed my a$$ off at the discovery channel 'documentary'.

Jet Fuel is simply KEROSINE. Go to the corner gas station, buy a gallon, pour it into a bucket, and toss in a match and watch what DOESN'T happen (an explosion)- or better yet, Do what I do about 10 times per year- pour it over a pile of wood and ignite it to make a bonfire. Nice and safe.

That is why jet airplanes are not blowing up left and right.

Try the same thing with gasoline (very explosive) and you better hope your health insurance is up-to-date.

85 posted on 06/22/2006 9:27:19 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
A blast from the past.

Leon Panetta Just Characterized TWA 800 as Terrorism

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1499976/posts

Martha MacCallum was just interviewing former Clinton Chief of Staff Leon Panetta about Louis Freeh's new book slamming the old administration on terror response. Panetta defended pitifully by saying they always had a "serious view" concerning this stuff "whether it be Oklahoma City or the Olympics bombing or the flight off New York City".

TWA 800 was not caused by a spontaneous fuel tank explosion. This is the fourth or fifth time a high-level Clinton staffer/senator has characterized TWA as a terrorist attack. We deserve to know what happened.

86 posted on 06/22/2006 9:27:32 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

No one that I saw that night appeared drunk at all.
They were, for the most part, a bit 'freaked out'.
And very anxious to tell of what they saw.
If I seen that I would have been scared to death.
*Tearing the house apart for my copy of 'The Downing of Flight 800'*


87 posted on 06/22/2006 9:28:52 AM PDT by carmenbmw (My cats name is Mean. He earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You have no such advantage. I was in Northern NJ on that Wednesday night watching TV. Don't assume to much.

Then did you see the early reports and the home movie

I saw the early reports but I did not see any home movie. Early reports are usually incorrect and misleading. I would love to see this movie.

If they are trying to cover something up, why would they give you info that would prove a coverup?

Then what to believe and not to believe?

That is also quite a few people in on the coverup.

If they were trying to cover something up couldn't they do a better job of it. I'm not saying all the facts are out because they probably aren't.

88 posted on 06/22/2006 9:32:09 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

you missed the point- it was shown once on TV then dissappeared, never to be shown again.

Of course you would like to see this clip- so would everyone else.

Other freepers here have also seen it.


89 posted on 06/22/2006 9:32:33 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: carmenbmw

I thought that I remembered correctly. And I couldn't believe how many times the next day that it was pointed out that these witnesses were "partying". I also remember a smear about the guys on maneuvers or that they had changed their story. It was scary how fast the story changed.


90 posted on 06/22/2006 9:37:46 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: EyeGuy
I remember distinctly, in the immediate aftermath of the crash that Kallstrom was adamant, to the point of being righteously PO'ed that this was an act of terror. Then after a few weeks like a dimmer switch, he backed off that stridency considerably and later became an advocate for the center tank explosion theory.

I, too, remember that quite well. He was confident, almost cocky, that they were soon to capture the perps. Then later it was like he had been doused with cold water. He was very subdued in tone and appearance. It was almost as if he were a different person.

The Kennedy assasination, Oklahoma City, and Flight 800 have a lot in common.

91 posted on 06/22/2006 9:37:49 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The fact that the CIA was involved in this investigation at all was a real tip-off for me. The CIA doesn't investigate "normal" airline disasters. Nor does the FBI, for that matter -- at least not to the extent that they were involved in this one.

Bingo.

92 posted on 06/22/2006 9:40:59 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
I saw the early reports but I did not see any home movie. Early reports are usually incorrect and misleading. I would love to see this movie.

I was up late watching the news. I honestly don't remember what time it was played. I went to bed around 3 or 4 am. It was on Fox 5.

That is also quite a few people in on the coverup.

Not really. People that worked for him knew they'd better be silent. And then there are those that agreed with him. The press has covered for Clinton since day 1. The eye witnesses were smeared so who needed to be silenced?

Well. There were a few.

TWA 800's 'Deep Throat' - (FBI, liberal media conspired in TWA 800 cover-up; Clinton wanted closure)

93 posted on 06/22/2006 9:43:58 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
And as a Physics major I laffed my a$$ off at the discovery channel 'documentary'.

The same is true of the computer simulation of the Kennedy assasination which attempted to prove the magic bullet story. Only problem was that other documents and pictures of the Zepruder film show that John Connally was not it the position depicted in the simulation. The "proof" had obviously been doctored.

94 posted on 06/22/2006 9:45:18 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done, needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: All
http://ntsb.gov/events/twa800/exhibits/Ex_4A_appZ.pdf

Read this Captain's testimony. It is interesting that he saw a bright light coming from inside or on TWA 800 for a while before the explosion. We was piloting a 737 in the area at the time.

95 posted on 06/22/2006 9:46:17 AM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: All

Gee, well over 100 witnesses were 'partying'? In lots of different locations?
I must live in the wrong state, lol.
The Clinton Administration seemed to have a vested interest in making things 'look ok'.
No matter how it hurt the country.
I suppose that 9-11 put that sort of propaganda to a stop.
Too many people saw what happened that day.


96 posted on 06/22/2006 9:50:14 AM PDT by carmenbmw (My cats name is Mean. He earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
Something doesn't add up with W. He has allowed himself to be smeared on too many issues that a simple airing of the facts could clear him. It's all about the 2 party monopoly if you ask me.

Agree wholeheartedly - I also think there is a "shadow" govt which pulls the strings of the visible govt - I don't think the US president comes close to calling *all* the shots. I guess it sounds like grassy knoll, oliver stone stuff, but as you point out, if you just assume high school civics, 2 and 2 don't add up to 4.

97 posted on 06/22/2006 9:58:08 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: carmenbmw

Read the link in 93.


98 posted on 06/22/2006 10:05:06 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If you think you know what's coming next....You don't know Jack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
It's all about the 2 party monopoly if you ask me.

It's always been about that!

99 posted on 06/22/2006 10:25:09 AM PDT by RobtPruitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

I'm rethinking.


100 posted on 06/22/2006 10:26:28 AM PDT by RobtPruitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson