[frogjerk]

You have no such advantage. I was in Northern NJ on that Wednesday night watching TV. Don't assume to much.

Then did you see the early reports and the home movie

I saw the early reports but I did not see any home movie. Early reports are usually incorrect and misleading. I would love to see this movie.

If they are trying to cover something up, why would they give you info that would prove a coverup?

Then what to believe and not to believe?

That is also quite a few people in on the coverup.

If they were trying to cover something up couldn't they do a better job of it. I'm not saying all the facts are out because they probably aren't.

[DJ MacWoW]

I saw the early reports but I did not see any home movie. Early reports are usually incorrect and misleading. I would love to see this movie.

I was up late watching the news. I honestly don't remember what time it was played. I went to bed around 3 or 4 am. It was on Fox 5.

That is also quite a few people in on the coverup.

Not really. People that worked for him knew they'd better be silent. And then there are those that agreed with him. The press has covered for Clinton since day 1. The eye witnesses were smeared so who needed to be silenced?

Well. There were a few.

TWA 800's 'Deep Throat' - (FBI, liberal media conspired in TWA 800 cover-up; Clinton wanted closure)