Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pluto Could Lose Planet Status
PhysOrg.com ^ | 21 June 2006 | Staff

Posted on 06/22/2006 4:11:12 AM PDT by PatrickHenry

At its conference this August, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) will make a decision that could see Pluto lose its status as a planet.

For the first time, the organisation will be officially defining the word "planet", and it is causing much debate in the world of astronomy.

There is only one thing that everyone seems to agree on: there are no longer nine planets in the Solar System.

The debate has been brought to a head by the discovery of a potential 10th planet, temporarily named 2003 UB313 in January 2005. This new candidate planet is bigger than Pluto.

The question now facing the IAU is whether to make this new discovery a planet.

Pluto is an unusual planet as it is made predominantly of ice and is smaller even than the Earth's Moon.

There is a group of astronomers that are arguing for an eight-planet SolarSystem, with neither Pluto or 2003 UB313 making the grade as a planet; but a number of astronomers are arguing for a more specific definition of a planet.

One of these; Kuiper Belt researcher Dr Marc Buie, of the Lowell Observatory in Arizona, has come up with a clear planetary definition he would like to see the IAU adopt.

I believe the definition of planet should be as simple as possible, so I've come up with two criteria," he said.

"One is that it can't be big enough to burn its own matter - that's what a star does. On the small end, I think the boundary between a planet and not a planet should be, is the gravity of the object stronger than the strength of the material of the object? That's a fancy way of saying is it round?"

This definition could lead to our Solar System having as many as 20 planets, including Pluto, 2003 UB313, and many objects that were previously classified as moons or asteroids.

One possible resolution to the debate is for new categories of planet to be introduced. Mercury, Venus, the Earth and Mars would be "rocky planets". The gas-giants Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune would be a second category.

Whatever the outcome of this debate there is only one thing that we can be certain of; by September 2006 there will no longer be just nine planets in our Solar System.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: artbell; kbo; planetx; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: Jaysun

I define a planet as anything Pluto or bigger that directly orbits a star.

Mercury
Venus
Earth
Mars
Jupiter
Saturn
Uranus
Neptune
Pluto
"Uebee"


41 posted on 06/22/2006 5:11:58 AM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Okay, you tell her that she's being demoted.


42 posted on 06/22/2006 5:15:21 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Plutism - plain and simple! Those bloody Plutists!!!

We need special planetary districts to guarantee representation of minority planets.


43 posted on 06/22/2006 5:15:32 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (outside a good dog, a book is your best friend. inside a dog it's too dark to read)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Past Your Eyes

How about Goofy? (Kerry comes to mind.)


44 posted on 06/22/2006 5:15:43 AM PDT by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; RadioAstronomer
Both definitions seem vague to me.

Re: star vs planet
if we think it's big enough to burn it's on matter, but isn't doing so? What if it's doing so but only on a very limited basis and doesn't look like a star?

Re: small end of planet
How round is round? We have mountains, does that mean our gravity isn't stronger than our material? Does an asteroid of fine particles that assumes a round shape qualify as a planet?

I think on the small end they should set a specific mass. On the large end, it should not be burning it's own material and it should be orbiting something.

What do we call a planet that's not orbiting a star? Is it still a planet?

45 posted on 06/22/2006 5:25:02 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dc27; SW6906
(5 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, guns and ammunition.)

I like your tagline, but you forgot horsepower.

Obviously, you've never tried to drive a 2WD truck up a steep hill on bald tires in the middle of winter... There IS such a thing as too much horsepower!!! ;-P

46 posted on 06/22/2006 5:25:47 AM PDT by MortMan (Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The only thing I learned that sticks in my head is: Stars twinkle, planets do not.


47 posted on 06/22/2006 5:29:52 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Interesting. Both Titan and Ganymede are larger than the planet Mercury...


48 posted on 06/22/2006 5:30:18 AM PDT by Sloth (We cannot defeat foreign enemies of the Constitution if we yield to the domestic ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

That's not too much horsepower, that's a baldness problem.

I was thinking balls could get added to that list, but then some guys have more balls than brains, and that's not good.


49 posted on 06/22/2006 5:31:27 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I have an VERY old USA atlas. There are several planets named and shown in their orbits besides what we learned in school.


50 posted on 06/22/2006 5:32:26 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: JusPasenThru

Yeh....For streaking!!


51 posted on 06/22/2006 5:33:34 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I can see the headline in the NY Times: Pluto Stripped of Planetary Status; Women and Minorities Most Affected
52 posted on 06/22/2006 5:33:34 AM PDT by ABG(anybody but Gore) ("By the time I'm finished with you, you're gonna wish you felt this good again" - Jack Bauer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Reminds me of a time I towed my friend's ski boat with my 2WD truck. His 4WD was in the shop. All was good going down his steep driveway, which wasn't paved. It was just covered with crushed rock. Had to let all the air out of the tires and put bags of concrete in the bed to get up the driveway. It wasn't pretty, resembled a tractor pull. He wasn't too happy about all the rocks bouncing off his gel coat.


53 posted on 06/22/2006 5:35:19 AM PDT by dc27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

I was dated a women, in college, who thought there were only 7 planets in the entire universe. 35 years later my friend, who sent me up with this blind date, still refers to her as "7 planet women". Maybe she was just ahead of her time.


54 posted on 06/22/2006 5:37:00 AM PDT by cynicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynicalman

i was = I once


55 posted on 06/22/2006 5:37:52 AM PDT by cynicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cynicalman

sent = set god I have to drink my cup of coffee before posting


56 posted on 06/22/2006 5:38:54 AM PDT by cynicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

Pluto not a planet!!! This is terrible!

Just yesterday, someone asked me if Goofy was really a dog?


57 posted on 06/22/2006 5:39:48 AM PDT by Maurice Tift
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
The 10th planet is nicknamed Xena until it is officially named.

Unfortunately, 2003 EL61 doesn't have a name yet.

58 posted on 06/22/2006 5:43:54 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
I define a planet as anything Pluto or bigger that directly orbits a star.

Actually, if you look at the orbit, "our" moon actually orbits the sun, not Earth. The moon's orbit is always concave toward the sun. Sometimes (once each month) the curvature of the moon's orbit becomes more than the average curvature of the Earth-moon system, and the moon moves a bit further from the sun, but the moon's orbit never curves away from the sun, nor does it ever 'back up'. The same thing can be said of the Earth itself. In effect, we have a double-planet system.

Calling Luna a planet also meets the quoted definition of a planet, where the gravity overcomes the strength of material (round). Of course, there are a lot of 'moons' of Saturn and Jupiter that are round. In those cases the moons' orbits do curve away from the sun.

Maybe you need to expand your definition and say that it's a bigger than Pluto and is the largest object within a million miles.
59 posted on 06/22/2006 5:45:17 AM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

Isn't that where the Cyber-Men come from?


60 posted on 06/22/2006 5:47:36 AM PDT by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson